I can only wonder why "they" continue to insist on these shots, and why they are still ruining people's lives over them? At the very least, it should be suspended until some studies are done. But I suspect that since they would be closing the barn door after the horse has escaped, they are "all in" on this travesty.
So I guess the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity experiments are taking place on the present clinical trial subjects, and rogue doctors like Ryan Cole are filling in the gaps for these missing studies …
Here’s an unrelated question: Since autophagy is known to help prevent and combat cancer (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6274804/), I wonder if practicing fasting (e.g., intermittent) would help the jabbed clean up the cellular debris and fend off the carcinogenic effects of the injection?
1 - ending the clinical trials at 3 months and giving the controls the shot (to eliminate the control group),
2 - mandating for maximum coverage to global population (same reason) while ostracizing the unvaccinated as dangerous pariahs (to shame them, while diverting blame for vax inefficacy),
3 - not recommending let alone requesting autopsies of deaths to C19,
4 - refusing to improve or upgrade VAERS, discouraging & denying reports to same (seriously lowering entries),
5 - creating no safety panels, no signal alerts (in fact denying and/or ignoring them),
all of this is all about "If we capture _no_ negative data, then there will be no evidence of harm & we're free from any legal ramifications of the effects of this product."
These are the kinds of calculations criminal sociopaths make when planning a mass murder. Just noting the similarity. Any similarity to sociopaths living or dead is just a coincidence. No Pfizer execs were harmed in the execution of this scheme. Consciences were not provided. All liability waived by the various governments.
Not to put to fine a point on it, but NO VACCINES have ever been studied for carcinogenicity, mutagenic or fertility impairment properties. Why? Because it only makes sense - based on the toxic chemical soup of ingredients in them - that vaccines would cause serious harm.
If they don’t actually do the studies, they can claim to not know how it impacts human health and since the vaccine inserts themselves state the vaccines haven’t been studied for any of this, well, the information WAS disclosed, even if you or your medical practitioner who recommended the vaccine to you didn’t actually read it for yourselves or you weren’t informed by your practitioner. The onus is on the individual to do their due diligence.
If you look at what has occurred in terms of the decline in human health since the US government took away all liability for the manufacturers, after which the vaccine schedule blew up and continues to do so, we don’t have to be rocket scientists to put 2+2 together. That whole correlation doesn’t mean causation BS used to mock people is just that, BS. Where there is smoke, there is fire.
Additionally, it’s interesting to note how easily everyone has gone along w the increase in veterinary vaccinations for pets. Low and behold, pet’s are sicker than they’ve ever been, often with diseases never even heard of in my childhood and young adult years, they die earlier and have a prevalence for cancer that more than likely closely aligns with the increases in childhood cancers.
IMO, lawfully, NO VACCINE can be mandated on anyone due to the fact that you cannot mandate any experimental product on someone, but for some reason, that seems to fly over everyone’s head, and no one challenges this from a constitutional perspective. If they haven’t yet done those studies after the length of time many of the vaccines have been on the market and there is no demand that they do so, then humans who take those products get what is coming to them. It isn’t only the Covid injections I’m referring to regarding mandates. This applies for adults, children and infants for ALL vaccines under all circumstances and anyone who joins the military is only signing up to become a human experimental subject without any recourse whatsoever. Sad facts, but facts nonetheless.
"These products are called ‘vaccines’ but they based on a completely different model - a completely different platform and delivery system, so they cannot be deemed non-mutagenic until proven otherwise with studies."
If common sense or Precautionary Principle had any place at FDA where evil genius, Monsanto atty as FDA Director created a Grand Canyon sized loophole called "substantial equivalence" for gmo foods. It works by measuring a few nutrient levels and compares that to traditional varieties with NO concern for the differences. Close enough for government work.
Fun side note Monsanto and Pfizer merged in 2000 to dump pension & PCB liability as well as "technology exchanges" like field trials of gmo food crops producing animal vaccines...
Here's what FDA rubber stamp looks like...
Compositional Analysis
Based on the nature of the genetic modification, it was not expected that glyphosate-tolerant soybeans would differ compositionally from other soybean varieties. To confirm this expectation, Monsanto carried out compositional analyses which focussed on analysis of whole beans but also included compositional analyses of major soy-derived products, including toasted soybean meal, soy oil, defatted soy flour, and soy protein isolate.
Based on their analysis of whole beans (and, for certain parameters, various soy products), Monsanto has concluded that glyphosate-tolerant soybeans are not significantly different from other soybean varieties in protein, fat, fiber, ash, carbohydrate, amino acid, fatty acid, trypsin inhibitor, lectin, isoflavone (genistein and daidzen), phospholipid (lecithin), phytate, stachyose, or raffinose content. Monsanto's analysis of some of these parameters in glyphosate-treated soybeans led them to similar conclusions.
In order to verify that glyphosate-tolerant varieties of soybeans express levels of soybean allergens no greater than traditional varieties, Monsanto carried out immunoblot analysis using pooled serum from individuals allergic to soybeans. Monsanto reported that there was no difference between glyphosate-tolerant and control lines of soybeans in the level of expression of immunoreactive material.
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
Hi Jessica. I finally bit the bullet and paid to suscribe to your substack purely to comment on this post.
I have been otherwise lurking in the background just watching and reading.
My name is Conway and I have CFS/M.E which is a frustrating chronic condition to live with.
Before this happened and in my early twenties I was a specialist army medic for the CBRNE response team. I specialized in chemical, biological and radiological rescue, containment and management. I was fit as a whistle and proud as a lion.
I have long seen my illness CFS/M.E as linked to and in a family of other illnesses. Gulf war syndrome, post-lyme disease, fibromyalgia, POTS, long-covid and Povid (post vaccine induced disease) as having an epigenetic or mutagenic onset. I think all these illnesses stem from genotoxicity although each has its own subtle variations and presentations. Dr Bruce Patterson is pioneering this field of research at present.
Lets say various mitochondria were affected by these genotoxic changes. Much like a petrol engine that runs too lean or too rich because the carburetors need to be tuned. The result would be inefficient energy production at the cellular level. Thus presenting sysyemically as long term fatigue.
Thank you for publishing an article in this arena. Not only could this show spike protein mutagenicity but also maybe the key to unlocking cures for other diseases often forgotten about.
The WHO is applying 17 year old data on vaccine cytotoxicity to an unprecedented gene therapy? ... it seems that mainstream science has become random trials.
One unacknowledged side effect that I think you should ferret out data on is increased falls/accidents due to loss of consciousness. If the numbers are as high as I suspect that they are, you would have a "smoking gun" of vaccine harm for the mainstream (as if myocarditis in young men wasn't enough). I know someone who had 3 unexplained episodes of losing consciousness after being vaccinated. The 3rd resulted in a terrible concussion from falling hard in the tub. She had to leave her job, and she has had to stop most daily activities and has become a professional "patient" going from neurologist to therapist to psychologist, etc. (and I don't mean professional "patient" disrespectfully--she is doing everything she knows how to to get better). I'm also thinking of Bob Saget...
The government and medical establishment “leaders” are all in the “CYA and lie” mode. I’m afraid we might never get the full truth of this scamdemic. Too many top level heads would have to roll and that kind of accountability seems to be unattainable.
I can only wonder why "they" continue to insist on these shots, and why they are still ruining people's lives over them? At the very least, it should be suspended until some studies are done. But I suspect that since they would be closing the barn door after the horse has escaped, they are "all in" on this travesty.
So I guess the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity experiments are taking place on the present clinical trial subjects, and rogue doctors like Ryan Cole are filling in the gaps for these missing studies …
Here’s an unrelated question: Since autophagy is known to help prevent and combat cancer (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6274804/), I wonder if practicing fasting (e.g., intermittent) would help the jabbed clean up the cellular debris and fend off the carcinogenic effects of the injection?
Like
1 - ending the clinical trials at 3 months and giving the controls the shot (to eliminate the control group),
2 - mandating for maximum coverage to global population (same reason) while ostracizing the unvaccinated as dangerous pariahs (to shame them, while diverting blame for vax inefficacy),
3 - not recommending let alone requesting autopsies of deaths to C19,
4 - refusing to improve or upgrade VAERS, discouraging & denying reports to same (seriously lowering entries),
5 - creating no safety panels, no signal alerts (in fact denying and/or ignoring them),
all of this is all about "If we capture _no_ negative data, then there will be no evidence of harm & we're free from any legal ramifications of the effects of this product."
These are the kinds of calculations criminal sociopaths make when planning a mass murder. Just noting the similarity. Any similarity to sociopaths living or dead is just a coincidence. No Pfizer execs were harmed in the execution of this scheme. Consciences were not provided. All liability waived by the various governments.
Not to put to fine a point on it, but NO VACCINES have ever been studied for carcinogenicity, mutagenic or fertility impairment properties. Why? Because it only makes sense - based on the toxic chemical soup of ingredients in them - that vaccines would cause serious harm.
If they don’t actually do the studies, they can claim to not know how it impacts human health and since the vaccine inserts themselves state the vaccines haven’t been studied for any of this, well, the information WAS disclosed, even if you or your medical practitioner who recommended the vaccine to you didn’t actually read it for yourselves or you weren’t informed by your practitioner. The onus is on the individual to do their due diligence.
If you look at what has occurred in terms of the decline in human health since the US government took away all liability for the manufacturers, after which the vaccine schedule blew up and continues to do so, we don’t have to be rocket scientists to put 2+2 together. That whole correlation doesn’t mean causation BS used to mock people is just that, BS. Where there is smoke, there is fire.
Additionally, it’s interesting to note how easily everyone has gone along w the increase in veterinary vaccinations for pets. Low and behold, pet’s are sicker than they’ve ever been, often with diseases never even heard of in my childhood and young adult years, they die earlier and have a prevalence for cancer that more than likely closely aligns with the increases in childhood cancers.
IMO, lawfully, NO VACCINE can be mandated on anyone due to the fact that you cannot mandate any experimental product on someone, but for some reason, that seems to fly over everyone’s head, and no one challenges this from a constitutional perspective. If they haven’t yet done those studies after the length of time many of the vaccines have been on the market and there is no demand that they do so, then humans who take those products get what is coming to them. It isn’t only the Covid injections I’m referring to regarding mandates. This applies for adults, children and infants for ALL vaccines under all circumstances and anyone who joins the military is only signing up to become a human experimental subject without any recourse whatsoever. Sad facts, but facts nonetheless.
"These products are called ‘vaccines’ but they based on a completely different model - a completely different platform and delivery system, so they cannot be deemed non-mutagenic until proven otherwise with studies."
If common sense or Precautionary Principle had any place at FDA where evil genius, Monsanto atty as FDA Director created a Grand Canyon sized loophole called "substantial equivalence" for gmo foods. It works by measuring a few nutrient levels and compares that to traditional varieties with NO concern for the differences. Close enough for government work.
Fun side note Monsanto and Pfizer merged in 2000 to dump pension & PCB liability as well as "technology exchanges" like field trials of gmo food crops producing animal vaccines...
Here's what FDA rubber stamp looks like...
Compositional Analysis
Based on the nature of the genetic modification, it was not expected that glyphosate-tolerant soybeans would differ compositionally from other soybean varieties. To confirm this expectation, Monsanto carried out compositional analyses which focussed on analysis of whole beans but also included compositional analyses of major soy-derived products, including toasted soybean meal, soy oil, defatted soy flour, and soy protein isolate.
Based on their analysis of whole beans (and, for certain parameters, various soy products), Monsanto has concluded that glyphosate-tolerant soybeans are not significantly different from other soybean varieties in protein, fat, fiber, ash, carbohydrate, amino acid, fatty acid, trypsin inhibitor, lectin, isoflavone (genistein and daidzen), phospholipid (lecithin), phytate, stachyose, or raffinose content. Monsanto's analysis of some of these parameters in glyphosate-treated soybeans led them to similar conclusions.
In order to verify that glyphosate-tolerant varieties of soybeans express levels of soybean allergens no greater than traditional varieties, Monsanto carried out immunoblot analysis using pooled serum from individuals allergic to soybeans. Monsanto reported that there was no difference between glyphosate-tolerant and control lines of soybeans in the level of expression of immunoreactive material.
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
F. Owen Fields, Ph.D.
Page Last Updated: 06/18/2009
https://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
This could be the biggest "whoopsie" in history. Or they knew this would happen which is even worse.
Hi Jessica. I finally bit the bullet and paid to suscribe to your substack purely to comment on this post.
I have been otherwise lurking in the background just watching and reading.
My name is Conway and I have CFS/M.E which is a frustrating chronic condition to live with.
Before this happened and in my early twenties I was a specialist army medic for the CBRNE response team. I specialized in chemical, biological and radiological rescue, containment and management. I was fit as a whistle and proud as a lion.
I have long seen my illness CFS/M.E as linked to and in a family of other illnesses. Gulf war syndrome, post-lyme disease, fibromyalgia, POTS, long-covid and Povid (post vaccine induced disease) as having an epigenetic or mutagenic onset. I think all these illnesses stem from genotoxicity although each has its own subtle variations and presentations. Dr Bruce Patterson is pioneering this field of research at present.
Lets say various mitochondria were affected by these genotoxic changes. Much like a petrol engine that runs too lean or too rich because the carburetors need to be tuned. The result would be inefficient energy production at the cellular level. Thus presenting sysyemically as long term fatigue.
Thank you for publishing an article in this arena. Not only could this show spike protein mutagenicity but also maybe the key to unlocking cures for other diseases often forgotten about.
Oh and I wrote you a poem inspired by gangsta rap.
One shot, two shot, three shot, four. Along comes the natural infection so you get spiked up some more.
4 shot, 3 shot, 2 shot, one. Living with chronic fatigue is not much fun.
Asbestos was a wonder substance mined from the earth.
Its fibres were fire resistant and flexible, that gave it great worth.
So we used it in construction and engineering way back in the day.
And now it costs an arm and a leg to remove it all away.
Radium watch dials glow brightly in the dark.
The painters of those dials were happy to do their part.
Until they started dying with strange radiation syndrome ills.
Then came the lawsuits and a lifetime of medical bills.
Thalidomide was a scandal nearly from the start.
Widely use to treat nausea of the expectant mothers it soon tore apart.
Birth defects aplenty. Cancerous lesions too.
Is history repeating itself?
Should this be worrying you?
How about cigarettes and the brand your doctor endorsed?
The lengthy legal battles and loss of revenue it forced.
We all know how that story came and went to pass.
So let's not pretend it cannot happen in this day and age of ass.
One shot, two shot, three shot four. Along comes the natural infection so you get spiked up some more.
Four shot, three shot, two shot, one. Living with chronic fatigue is not much fun.
It’s getting worse by the day.
this seems so surreal now, Fascinated to learn more though I feel a mild dreading of what you will find that these Snake Oil formulators cooked up...
The WHO is applying 17 year old data on vaccine cytotoxicity to an unprecedented gene therapy? ... it seems that mainstream science has become random trials.
One unacknowledged side effect that I think you should ferret out data on is increased falls/accidents due to loss of consciousness. If the numbers are as high as I suspect that they are, you would have a "smoking gun" of vaccine harm for the mainstream (as if myocarditis in young men wasn't enough). I know someone who had 3 unexplained episodes of losing consciousness after being vaccinated. The 3rd resulted in a terrible concussion from falling hard in the tub. She had to leave her job, and she has had to stop most daily activities and has become a professional "patient" going from neurologist to therapist to psychologist, etc. (and I don't mean professional "patient" disrespectfully--she is doing everything she knows how to to get better). I'm also thinking of Bob Saget...
This is getting sort of scary.
The government and medical establishment “leaders” are all in the “CYA and lie” mode. I’m afraid we might never get the full truth of this scamdemic. Too many top level heads would have to roll and that kind of accountability seems to be unattainable.
Looks like they blew right by all the necessary safety testing at warp speed.
Would love you to write about cancer being associated with a metabolic problem. I’m all ears (and eyes!).