19 Comments
User's avatar
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

GO, GEERT!! 🙌

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

I’ve watched this three times, to iron the concepts in well. Geert is a legend to so many of us around the world. Thank you Jessica and thanks to Dr. McMillan for hosting Geert on one of the best interviews I’ve seen on this topic.

Expand full comment
Mark Much's avatar

I'm glad that Geert, Mike Yeadon, Sucharit Bhakdi, Vernon Coleman, as well as more hero scientists from Canada and the USA are on our side. We shall overcome the weasel scientists who work for the Davos gang.

Expand full comment
Esther's avatar

Thank you Jessica. Please give our thanks to Geert and Dr McMillan.🙏

Expand full comment
shawn's avatar

As we speak the CBC is reporting a serious outbreak of hepatitis in children in Canada. They are driving home that the majority of the children were not Vaccinated. Both implying and saying directly this hepatitis is a result of covid not vax might be true, might be another counter move to stopping the vax. Might be masking the little guys.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

I was reading a theory by a Dr. Doug Corrigan yesterday. He was saying that though they used a non-replicating adenovirus in the DNA-viral vectored vaccines, that perhaps the adenovirus, through recombinations and reshuffling of its genes, became replicative and is now infecting these children. They are mostly not vaccinated with any Covid vaccine, but it doesn’t matter with this theory if a new adenovirus has been spawned from this technology. Many of the kids were found to be positive for “adenovirus 41” so who knows what is going on. They are creating monsters with these genetic biologic injectables. Jessica, what do you think about this concerning issue with hepatitis in so many young ones?

Expand full comment
shawn's avatar

maybe its coming home to roost now, I hope not. Poor little guys

Expand full comment
Potatodots's avatar

Geert has spoken about de-attenuation, illustrating with the polio jab in Africa. I wasn't thinking big enough to get outside the covid box. Thank you for bringing this up!

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

I will posit that the children have been contaminated with the Spike Protein from SHEDDING from close contact with vaccinated parents. The Spike protein lodges in the liver, leads to hepatitis.

Expand full comment
shawn's avatar

as valid as any point lets hope not though that would be furtherest from ironic

Expand full comment
Steven Lidkea's avatar

Or it could just be straight-up bull, like doctors saying that the vaksed are in danger of catching the Wuhan from the unvaksed.

Expand full comment
southern kiwi's avatar

Hi Jessica. Are you able to understand Geert Vanden Bossche's very interesting (and possibly seminal) long paper of 31MAR22:

https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/616004c52e87ed08692f5692/6244c3b09ad5701f3ec17765_GVB_s%2Banalysis%2Bof%2BC-19%2Bevolutionary%2Bdynamics.pdf

and maybe interpret/translate it a little for we poor peasants? I get the gist, but the detail is well hard for those of us not trained in your fields.

Expand full comment
CatSpeaks's avatar

I think that Geert is a bit naive to believe that hospitals will be forced to administer ivermectin in order to save the massive number of people who will be flooding the hospitals. The whole point in creating covid 19 and the subsequent "vaccine" for it is to depopulate the world. Hospitals will not do what is best for their patients and give them safe, cheap, and proven anti-virals like ivermectin. They will prescribe, and withhold, whatever medication the agency who is paying them tells them to.

Expand full comment
Erik's avatar

Unfortunately many doctors and nurses have proven to be good little nazis and follow orders. Remdesivir is horrifically toxic, but they keep using it because FauXi says to.

Expand full comment
shawn's avatar

shawn

Writes shawn663@substack ·just now

Regarding discrimination:

We have come along way, no need to go into detail about that.

Here is the question of interest today.

Is it discriminatory/illegal for a broadcaster national or local to refuse to place an ad which is not hate speech, violence promoting or discriminatory. I won't promote your ad because I don't agree with your perfectly legal cause..

If so does that not give them the right to refuse service to any cause they choose based on anything they choose,,,,,colour to religion etc... I don't think that is allowed

Therefore we should be legally able to demand our right to place an advert related to the WHO constitution takeover on the national networks. If they refuse at the vary least we can expose their refusal. I am sure they will refuse by the way, we still win!

The ad will require airtime purchase and direction.scripting etc....

I am sure we can through donations raise far more than enough money to accomplish this one simple thing. And it is simple, in a society that values free speech.

Possibly we can find someone capable of organizing such an action, can we set up a sign up form somewhere online we can collect donations. In canada be sure you don't donate more than 25 dollars you could be flagged as a terrorist. Yes I didn't capitalize canada not sure we are still worthy of country status,,,, it seems we are a corporation now favouring some over others as is the corporate right.

using the internet the tool they most fear lets organize. Find someone that is experienced in commercials and the drive to get it done. I will be the first to donate.

Expand full comment
Esther's avatar

Great idea. I will totally donate and spread the word in my circle of friends.

Expand full comment
shawn's avatar

Thank you Esther

Expand full comment
Adventuready's avatar

Jessica, Thank you so much for posting this substantive, informative interview regarding ADE. It takes courage to relay this big, bad information, in a population who chooses to keep their head in the sand.

Expand full comment
anti-republocrat's avatar

Toward the end (around 59 minutes), Geert says the only way out is widespread use of Ivermectin to stop spread. He thinks governments will be forced to do that. Unfortunately, he seems not to understand that many very influential people have a GOAL of population reduction.

Expand full comment