FOIA obtained by Judicial Watch, Inc.

There are emails to CDC officials concerning effects of the shots by concerned citizens as well...

A FOIA obtained by Judicial Watch, Inc. at the end of last year has come into my email inbox and it’s a long list of pages with a lot of repetition - but there are some noteworthy tid-bits in there. The original request was for anything in the records of Health and Human Services (HHS) concerning Antibody-Dependent Enhancement or ADE. I realize that this is a year old, but it is still relevant and I had not been aware, so it’s possible that others are not aware as well.

Here is the original request from Judicial Watch. Thank you Judicial Watch, by the way.

Source: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of September 9, 2021, assigned #21-02203-FOIA obtained by Judicial Watch Inc.

The original response letter from HHS is dated November 29, 2021, but the information therein is still very relevant.

There is an email string on the subject of a 13-year-old healthy boy who died within hours of being injected with one of the COVID-19 products. The pathologist thinks it was myocarditis that killed him. This can be found on page 223 of the document.

Update: I believe that this boy’s VAERS report remains in VAERS, but does not indicate that he died. This boy’s report also indicates the reporting state as Michigan, the age as 13 years old, MedDRA code ‘Myocarditis’ listed, vax date in June, 2 days to onset. VAERS ID: 1376934. Judge for yourselves.

Here is the original complete string in the email entitled: ‘TODAY’S NEWS’ confronting the story reported by Fox News and The Washington Times by Shen Wu Tan. The CDC responses in the pages in the FOIA indicate that the CDC people didn’t know if the CDC were looking into it. I might have gotten the wrong impression, but that’s what it looked like to me.

The responses to and from CDC employees including Walensky were:

Any details on CDC engagement?

and

And details on this?

They found out from the CDC’s Deputy Director, Office of Science that the boy was healthy and died 2 days after his COVID shot, from heart damage (myocarditis).

Where have I heard that before?

Now I don’t know what happened in terms of outcome in this particular boy’s case but that’s also an important point to raise. Why don’t I know? Do you guys know? Maybe you do. I kind of hope that you do so that his death isn’t just statistified by bureaucrats defending the ‘safety’ of the products that they are endorsing.

The thing about the write-up on this boy’s death is the obnoxious script-like rhetoric from the ‘CDC officials’ redirecting to ‘statistics’ and the ‘overall safety’ of these injections. Yeah, but. Dead boy. Healthy. No reason. Cause of death? And hey, how about the thousands of other reports from young boys succumbing to myocarditis in the context of these shots in VAERS alone? Or the hundreds specific to 13-year-old boys? What about those? Can you write that into the explanation of why this boy’s life isn’t incredibly significant? Do you think it would be statistically insignificant if it was your boy?

One more thing about the FOIA’s content. There were a couple of emails from concerned people therein. Here are some screenshots of two of them.

This first one has a pretty strong title. It has the words ‘complicit’ and ‘murder’ in it. The email points to individuals who have been damaged by the shots and this person is making a personal plea to Walensky to endorse the Precautionary Principle - which is what everyone in positions of power should be doing right now, in my opinion. My guess would be that most of these people couldn’t tell a T cell from a small cell tower, so I am pretty sure that they do not understand the potential genetic and immunological risks and potential outcomes of these improperly tested novel products - novel from a gene therapy point of view (if it integrates) and novel from a carrier molecule point of view. Who could, right? Probably a good idea to exercise caution.

This second email is a more demanding plea to not simply exercise caution, but to stop the go-ahead of these COVID products/injections via the route of VRBPAC/FDA hearings, altogether. Remember those commercials when we were kids on the TV to: ‘Just Say No’? Maybe we should. It was directed at Walensky and other top dogs at the CDC and FDA. I wonder if this concerned citizen received a reply?

I wanted to raise 2 points in this article:

1. The CDC/FDA/HHS are well aware of the concerns raised both internally and externally (by concerned and affected citizens who did their due diligence to get injected, and subsequently were injured by the shots only to be ignored, and also by so-called ‘Whistleblowers’)

2. By my assessment, the CDC/FDA/HHS appear to be doing nothing to appease these concerns. By simply acknowledging their avoidance to do a rigorous analysis of both the entirely atypical magnitude and range of safety signals originating from VAERS alone, it is clear to me. It is your pharmacovigilance tool and data: please use it.

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

I wish everyone the heart and soul to illuminate the dark corners in the rooms of our society in 2023, and also in the dark rooms of the many hearts that used to beat for humanity.