Dr. Boz: "The biggest crime in the history of medicine"
Dr. Annette Bosworth goes through our Cureus paper with a fine-toothed comb... I wonder how she'll react when she finds out it was unethically retracted?
Dr. Annette Bosworth does an very thorough job going through our paper “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign”, which has recently been unethically retracted - very much against the wills of us as authors. This paper was peer-reviewed by 7 reviewers and multiple editors, and Cureus was not the first journal we went through this process with.
Many journals simply ‘waste time’ by putting authors through the review process and then ultimately, reject papers for publication. So you can think of any paper that has any inkling of push-back against the COVID narrative getting through peer-review as having gone through multiple rounds of peer-review in the context of many different journals.
Please do watch her video explanation of the paper’s findings. She does a really good job. It’s funny how she comments on ‘playing with statistics’ because as many of us know by now, statistical and data entry shenanigans were not uncommon to begin with, and since the COVID era, standard.
She titles this video: “The biggest crime in the history of medicine”, and I think this is accurate.
Two hallmarks of anything even related to COVID-19 are fraud and lies: both consistent and intentional. And all we’ve been doing for four years as scientists, researchers, medical doctors, injured people and citizens of the world (who maintain common sense), is pointing out these hallmarks in whatever way we have, to do so.
We will persist. Because the people have a right to know.
Take every episode of censorship as a win. Those that matter will recognise the truth. Those who celebrate the censorship aren't the ones that matter. There is no victory for the censors, only reinforcement of truth and just cause on the other side.
she did just put out a video I saw, saying about the retraction and "was I duped?" she had been demonetised after going thru your paper on video and then put out a video about the importance of not censoring scientific debate. this last i saw was a reaction to the retraction.