Just as the SV 40 promoter and enhancer are in the Pfizer junk and shouldn't be, but was known to Pfizer, this other mechanism had to have been known to enough white-coated geniuses (at whose feet we're all supposed to kneel) along the way -- to either eliminate it or leave it be...
Just as the SV 40 promoter and enhancer are in the Pfizer junk and shouldn't be, but was known to Pfizer, this other mechanism had to have been known to enough white-coated geniuses (at whose feet we're all supposed to kneel) along the way -- to either eliminate it or leave it be...
BTW, Jessica, Dr. McCullough continues to call the modRNA in this junk "messenger" RNA. If I understand correctly, the RNA in this junk came from synthetic DNA coded for the RNA. If the DNA is synthetic, does that not then make the RNA synthetic or πππ πππππ vs. (naturally-occurring) messenger RNA?
Thank you! So, it is incorrect to call this "messenger" RNA when it is, in fact, modified RNA? Nothing natural about it, which is what real messenger RNA is.
You amaze me, Jessica.
Just as the SV 40 promoter and enhancer are in the Pfizer junk and shouldn't be, but was known to Pfizer, this other mechanism had to have been known to enough white-coated geniuses (at whose feet we're all supposed to kneel) along the way -- to either eliminate it or leave it be...
BTW, Jessica, Dr. McCullough continues to call the modRNA in this junk "messenger" RNA. If I understand correctly, the RNA in this junk came from synthetic DNA coded for the RNA. If the DNA is synthetic, does that not then make the RNA synthetic or πππ πππππ vs. (naturally-occurring) messenger RNA?
the modified mRNA is modified by subbing out the uridines for n1-methylpseudoUs
Thank you! So, it is incorrect to call this "messenger" RNA when it is, in fact, modified RNA? Nothing natural about it, which is what real messenger RNA is.
it's modified mRNA
That is a big big problem for the body!