This is dangerous. Be careful. This could live in people's minds for...I don't know how long...until they get an excess of amyloidal plaque past the blood brain barrier?
I'm sure a lot of these claims are related to the so-called vaccines but never underestimate the contribution to disability claims that all round bad economy, small business closures, and unemployment make.
Interested in how much of the increased reporting from women is due to gender differences- women tend to speak up more about what ails them, whereas men tend to ‘suck it up.’ Thank you for digging into this!
I work in the self funded health space, males don’t report or go to the doctor unless their wife makes them or they are dying, FACT!! This is why insurance carriers love high male populations for insurance groups. Also of note insurance carriers don’t like hospitals or medical facilities they are the sickest & use the most pharma drugs including combo off label uses, again I negotiate in this realm and review the actual data of drugs & medical claims.
I've only come into contact with medical people like you describe recently. I've been referring to it as the pharmaceutical lifestyle - everything revolves around taking those drugs. No bodily function or reaction is allowed to happen without a pharmacological additive.
I would feel sorry for them except they are hellbent on evangelizing everyone in their circle into taking the vaxx.
Excellent article Dr Rose. The preponderance of female adverse vax events is interesting. Could it imply an etiopathophysiologic mechanism of injury? For example, women of reproductive age has a significant (5-fold?) increase in autoimmune disease. The genetic family cluster of disease injuries also suggests a potential genetic, epigenetic, proteinomic or environmental factors as well? And can anyone help me understand why the Pfizer 5.3.6 post market data had such a statistically unlikely ratio of women to men? Could it be that Pfizer is targeting women since they knew it concentrated in the ovaries thus exposing ALL gametes (ovum)?
The rat study of lipid nanoparticle distribution showed the same pattern, with female rats accumulating increasing amounts over time in the ovaries and liver, compared to males. So Pfizer should have expected exactly what the post-marketing results showed, or adjusted their shots to ensure that it didnt result in that unequal effect!
That trend line is too short to make the argument you want - we would need to see a year or two prior. As presented now, it appears that disability reports were down at the end of 2019 and then COVID itself started a steady upward trend (no effect of injectables). That would even be believable due to the mishandling of the pandemic via lockdowns which caused massive disruption and depression and drinking etc. To make an argument about injectables in 2021, would want to see two lines separated by a big jump. Or maybe some sort of acceleration curve, to account for the effect of injectables plus mutations of the virus breaking through it.
I just came up with this on my 5 mile walk in the park:
The Jab Song
It was an itsy-bitsy teenie-weenie self-assembling nano-meanie
That they jabbed in her shoulder today.
An itsy-bitsy teenie-weenie terribly toxic nano-meanie,
And in her liver it wanted to play.
This is dangerous. Be careful. This could live in people's minds for...I don't know how long...until they get an excess of amyloidal plaque past the blood brain barrier?
I'm cross posting this hoping three Substack Authors can work together on disability potentially caused by Covid-19 shots:
Jessica Rose: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/disability-claims-us-bureau-of-labor
Steve Kirsch:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-cool-new-way-to-get-an-estimate
A Midwestern Doctor:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/a-massive-spike-in-disability-is
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/all-evidence-suggests-the-covid-vaccines
I'm sure a lot of these claims are related to the so-called vaccines but never underestimate the contribution to disability claims that all round bad economy, small business closures, and unemployment make.
All those menstrual and gynecological anomalies tell a different story -- more specific to the MOA of injury of the shots.
I don't disagree with what you say. My point was that FRED and VAERS graphs have a significant difference in what they capture.
Hi Jessica! What’s the single best source to show naysayers who try to say unvaccinated are dying at 5x the rate of vaccinated?
i really don't know... if someone is a naysayer, then i would hope they have data to back-up their nay.
Superb work! Thank you Jessica!
Interested in how much of the increased reporting from women is due to gender differences- women tend to speak up more about what ails them, whereas men tend to ‘suck it up.’ Thank you for digging into this!
I work in the self funded health space, males don’t report or go to the doctor unless their wife makes them or they are dying, FACT!! This is why insurance carriers love high male populations for insurance groups. Also of note insurance carriers don’t like hospitals or medical facilities they are the sickest & use the most pharma drugs including combo off label uses, again I negotiate in this realm and review the actual data of drugs & medical claims.
I've only come into contact with medical people like you describe recently. I've been referring to it as the pharmaceutical lifestyle - everything revolves around taking those drugs. No bodily function or reaction is allowed to happen without a pharmacological additive.
I would feel sorry for them except they are hellbent on evangelizing everyone in their circle into taking the vaxx.
Excellent article Dr Rose. The preponderance of female adverse vax events is interesting. Could it imply an etiopathophysiologic mechanism of injury? For example, women of reproductive age has a significant (5-fold?) increase in autoimmune disease. The genetic family cluster of disease injuries also suggests a potential genetic, epigenetic, proteinomic or environmental factors as well? And can anyone help me understand why the Pfizer 5.3.6 post market data had such a statistically unlikely ratio of women to men? Could it be that Pfizer is targeting women since they knew it concentrated in the ovaries thus exposing ALL gametes (ovum)?
The rat study of lipid nanoparticle distribution showed the same pattern, with female rats accumulating increasing amounts over time in the ovaries and liver, compared to males. So Pfizer should have expected exactly what the post-marketing results showed, or adjusted their shots to ensure that it didnt result in that unequal effect!
Ooof. Is it possible?
You might also be interested in the Israeli study showing reduced sperm count from Pfizer shots, reviewed at
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pfizer-vaccine-effects-on-total-motile
Well this just out will increase this number.
Studies Suggest Possible Link of Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis After COVID-19 Vaccination
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/studies-suggest-possible-link-of-neuromyelitis-optica-diagnosis-after-covid-19-vaccination_4535676.html
Thank you
That trend line is too short to make the argument you want - we would need to see a year or two prior. As presented now, it appears that disability reports were down at the end of 2019 and then COVID itself started a steady upward trend (no effect of injectables). That would even be believable due to the mishandling of the pandemic via lockdowns which caused massive disruption and depression and drinking etc. To make an argument about injectables in 2021, would want to see two lines separated by a big jump. Or maybe some sort of acceleration curve, to account for the effect of injectables plus mutations of the virus breaking through it.
Thanks for writing this.
Exactly correct Krishna
His Twitter account was suspended by Gettr is fine.
Saw that when I tried again after Jessica's post. Going to delete my original comment.
Was shocked ~ glad to hear it was a malfunction for me!