Thoughts and comments
My parents tried to get vaccinated the same day but there was some red tape mess up for my mom, and she had to wait and go to a different provider, so my dad's batches were different from my mom's. Both my dad's Moderna doses were on the first couple of screens of worst batches at howbad.info. My mom's Modernas were way, way further down and no deaths were associated with them. My dad died within 8 weeks of multiple organ failure no known cause. My mom is still fine despite a serious chronic illness. I'd really like a proper answer to this question (I am a biostatistician) and I appreciate you having your hand up in class Jessica!
and, we love you for it
I bet that if YOU had been administering vaccines, Jessica, they would have all been 100% saline. You're such a rebel.
Thank you for all your work and thank you very much for your thoughts on our study. I just wanted to add, that the lot size data, we obtained from The Danish Serum Institute, is in fact the number of doses pr. batch, that were shipped from the Danish Serum Institute to all the Danish vaccination centers. It is perhaps the data, that comes closest to being the real number of administered doses pr. batch, since the shipped doses exclude any doses, the Serum Institute might have in stock.
I should also mention that the ADR data, is in fact collected much the same way as VAERS, but the quality is in my opinion much better. Of all the known reported batch numbers only, a mere fraction does not validate correctly towards the lot size list.
I'm guessing this is one of the unexpected and unintended beneficial side effects of living in one of the countries in the world that collects and registers the most data about their citizenry.
Jessica, Can you imagine anyone from big pharma, FDA, CDC, MSM or the federal government calling for the same standard of integrity for themselves as you have required of yourself?
That is why we trust YOU and listen to nothing coming from THEM.
I looked up the batch numbers my parents took in howbadismybatch,com and sure enough the 1st dose was deadly. The 2nd had no real deadly effects reported.
Keep the hand up for us Jessica. Thank you.
Excellent comments guys. :) Again, love Substack.
Hedley Rees Substack for anyone who doesn't follow him - Engineer Consultant to the Pharma industry manufacturing processes. He runs through the explanation of all the hoops that weren't jumped in this nonsense - all production regulations ignored. Knows his stuff.
Prof Dolores Cahill spoke right at the start saying samples from every processing stage and batch must be placed in biosecure storage for future cross referencing. From what she was saying this wasn't and isn't done.
In the UK NHS are in their 'Spring Campaign' of jabbing. Lost count of how many doses folk have had now. But the shedding in these times is a nightmare.
I am the one at the back, looking out of the window at Nature, not paying attention in class, who suddenly re-joins proceedings and asks a dumb question. So IF it turned out that smaller batches were more deadly, could it be that this was deliberate, so as not to kill too many people at once?
In fact, the study might only ask the question: what factors can explain significant differences in SAE? What evidence can Pfizer provide to support the investigation?
I begged my daughter & son-in-law not to take the shots. From what they told me they stopped at two. Her father-in-law has had shot #4 and recently diagnosed with stage 4 cancer...we lost hubby's dad Feb 14, 2022 after receiving his 3rd shot. Justice required for humanity!
Jessica you are a warrior for the masses 🙏 ❤️
In the news is that countries are incinerating older stock, some that have not been touched I think. At any rate as the vials expire the evidence will burn. A pity as keeping some on hand for testing would be nice.
Knowing that the global roll out was of an experimental material that was under trial and many trials adjust the product to determine outcomes it would seem that the global population would be an ideal platform to test MULTIPLE products alongside the official covid mRNA product. Various damaged or contaminated versions could be tested. Different gene sequences could be tested.
With the LOT number recorded in VAERS and equivalent the victims of side effects are personally documenting all the harm each batch has caused.
No matter if VAERS only records 1, 4, 10 or 20% of harm, we can be sure Pfizer knows what the under reporting is if they even care. The fact that covid vax is at least 20 times worse than any other is clear to everyone.
This has been the largest involuntary medical experiment in history.
I'm still not entirely convinced that these batches were not actually the "good batches". Temperature requirements in storage and distribution were virtually impossible to be met, even in developed countriess. And largely actually were NOT met. This, together with all the contaminants and extraneous DNA/Plasmids in ALL the Lots make it quite possibloe that the properly controlled batches were, in fact, the "good" ones in the intended sense.
This reminds me of the excellent article by The Midwestern Doctor, reviewing a history of pharma's intentional geographical distribution of lots to better hide clusters of injury from "hot lots" of DTP vax in 1970s that murdered babies:
"Wyeth apparently also decided to act to prevent a clustering of deaths following DPT vaccination from a single lot from ever occurring again in a single geographical area. On August 27, 1979, a Wyeth official wrote in an internal Wyeth memo, “After the reporting of the SIDS cases in Tennessee, we discussed the merits of limiting distribution of a large number of vials from a single lot to a single state, county or city health department and obtained agreement from the senior management staff to proceed with such a plan.”
The memo revealed that Wyeth would attempt to distribute no more than 2,000 packages of vaccine from one lot number to a single destination. Another 1983 memo confirmed that policy of limiting shipments of DPT vaccine from a single lot to a geographical location, referring back to the “SIDS episode.” If this practice is shared by all the vaccine manufacturers, it is easy to understand why the Tennessee “SIDS episode” has never been repeated and why the tracing of hot lots of vaccine is so very difficult in America [this is EXTREMELY important to understand when examining the question of hot COVID-19 vaccine lots exist and the FDA’s previous discovery that significant variability exists between Pfizer lots] .
Figure 1 suggests a possible deliberate experiment.
Increasing toxicity in smaller batches to investigate response.