Censorship = dictatorship

My interview with Frank McCaughey didn't last 11 hours on YouTube

So the censorship continues. I did a very detailed and informative interview with Frank McCaughey of Ireland on the subject of the pointlessness, potential harms and dangers associated with mass injection of children during this ‘pandemic’ with the known non-sterilizing COVID-19 injectable products. And it has been removed. You can watch it here.

Let’s check out what YouTube’s Community Guidelines are, shall we?

YouTube’s Community Guidelines: These determine what content is allowed
on YouTube and help make YouTube a safe place to foster community.

A safe place to foster community, eh? What kind of community are you thinkin’ ‘bout there, YouTube? A community akin to an enslaved, dead-eyed mass of hypnotized automatons? If I may: no thanks on that. I’d rather live on that cat Island. So, for those of you who didn’t get to see the video (I imagine that is all of you since it was up for less than 24 hours), I talked at length about the ‘don’t’s of injecting pre-pubescent children with experimental products for which the ingredient list is a big secret for a ‘disease’ that they do not succumb to.

Ah, I see now. It was because I mentioned Ivermectin. Boy. YouTube. Get with the program! Read some studies for crying out loud! And update your censorship guidelines! Make them reflect the scientific truth and not the weird false dictates of singular beings who feast on the ‘community’ to increase their ‘power’.

Here’s what I found in their COVID-19 medical misinformation policy.

Treatment misinformation: 

• Content that encourages the use of home remedies, prayer, or rituals in place of medical treatment such as  consulting a doctor or going to the hospital

• Content that claims that there’s a guaranteed cure for COVID-19

• Content that recommends use of Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19

• Claims that Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19

• Categorical claims that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19 

• Claims that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are safe to use in the treatment COVID-19

• Other content that discourages people from consulting a medical professional or seeking medical advice

Ok. I want to work backwards through the italicized points, if I may.

1. Hey YouTube. I AM a medical sciences professional. This IS my consultation. Doesn’t that make your dictate of discouraging ‘consulting a medical professional’ moot? I am not only not discouraging this, in addition to encouraging this, I am this.

2. Hey YouTube. GET WITH THE PROGRAM. Ivermectin has been affiliated with Nobel-ity. It’s not only been awarded a prize for its safe use as an anti-parastic for decades and been doled out to literally billions of people, (including pregnant women and children) with no ill effects, it has an excessively successful safety profile as an off-label drug in the context of COVID-19.

   ¹

3. It has also been clinically-tested and proven effective in the context of COVID-19 as an off-label drug - which is more than we can say about the clot shots, eh?

   ²
   ³
   ⁴
   ⁵
   ⁶
   ⁷
   ⁸
   ⁹
   ¹⁰
   ¹¹

4. Based on points, 1, 2 and 3, I would recommend the off-label use of Ivermectin. As a Medical Scientist.

Oh and by the way, aren’t you violating your own ‘Community Standards’ with your point on a ‘guaranteed cure for COVID-19’? You guys are so sure that your injections are the only way to deal with this situation. Doesn’t that imply that this guarantees a cure? No wait. It doesn’t. But what it does do is set a precedent and instigate a thought: there will never be a cure for COVID-19. It’s incurable. Which is: true. But it’s also no worse than the flu in the non-vulnerable, which is most people. Including children. So we don’t need to seek a ‘cure’. Just like we don’t need to seek a ‘cure’ for the common cold or the flu. That’s one of the things that our bloody immune systems are for and very good it - preventing disease.

Viruses are EVERYWHERE. ALL THE TIME. It’s not a reason to freak out. Educate yourself and others on this. It about high time people learned that we are constantly engaging and have co-evolved with viruses and bacteria for the entirety of our existences. It’s what we are.

¹²

Our genome is 7% retrovirus. If we attempt to destroy this magnificence then we are not only stupid, but we will be destroyed in turn. Leave the immune system alone. Or rather, optimize it. Be healthy. Avoid toxins. As much as you can. Pretty simple.

So there you are YouTube. You have been brought up-to-date. Now, I don’t like simply bitching about stuff, even though it does feel good, so I wanted to bring it to everyone’s attention that you can fight to have your content re-instated once it has been removed. However, it is not a common occurrence to have a video re-instated once it has been censored. The ones that do get re-instated typically are ones that were erroneously taken down. I think that the Youtube overlords would argue that since they are paid to enforce the dictate narrative, they cannot stand behind science and truth, and therefore, I think they would hold fast to their ‘claims’ that Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective.

Foreverrrrrrrrrrr.

Here’s an interesting read for all of all you freedom-loving people. It’s a guide on how to deal with online censorship and ways to evade state-sponsored censorship and spying written by Paul Bischoff.

Lifted from Paul Bischoff’s: A beginner’s guide to online censorship.

1. Crump, A. Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations. J Antibiot 70, 495–505 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2017.11

2. Santin AD, Scheim DE, McCullough PA, Yagisawa M, Borody TJ. Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19. New Microbes New Infect. 2021 Aug 3;43:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100924. PMID: 34466270; PMCID: PMC8383101.

3. Ahmed S, Karim MM, Ross AG, Hossain MS, Clemens JD, Sumiya MK, Phru CS, Rahman M, Zaman K, Somani J, Yasmin R, Hasnat MA, Kabir A, Aziz AB, Khan WA. A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:214-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.191. Epub 2020 Dec 2. PMID: 33278625; PMCID: PMC7709596.

4. Portmann-Baracco A, Bryce-Alberti M, Accinelli RA. Antiviral and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Ivermectin and Its Potential Use in COVID-19. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2020 Dec;56(12):831. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 7. PMID: 32736876; PMCID: PMC7340065.

5. Bryant A, Lawrie TA, Dowswell T, Fordham EJ, Mitchell S, Hill SR, Tham TC. Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines. Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402. PMID: 34145166; PMCID: PMC8248252.

6. Rajter JC, Sherman MS, Fatteh N, Vogel F, Sacks J, Rajter JJ. Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Ivermectin in COVID Nineteen Study. Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 13. PMID: 33065103; PMCID: PMC7550891.

7. Sharun K, Dhama K, Patel SK, Pathak M, Tiwari R, Singh BR, Sah R, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Leblebicioglu H. Ivermectin, a new candidate therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020 May 30;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-00368-w. PMID: 32473642; PMCID: PMC7261036.

8. Morgenstern J, Redondo J N, Olavarria A, et al. (August 26, 2021) Ivermectin as a SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Method in Healthcare Workers: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Cureus 13(8): e17455. doi:10.7759/cureus.17455

9. Zaidi, A.K., Dehgani-Mobaraki, P. RETRACTED ARTICLE: The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article. J Antibiot (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00430-5 (and yes, I am aware they have censored this work. I know the feeling.)

10. Asaf Biber, Michal Mandelboim, Geva Harmelin, Dana Lev, Li Ram, Amit Shaham, Ital Nemet, Limor Kliker, Oran Erster, Eli Schwartz. Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. medRxiv 2021.05.31.21258081; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081

11. Pierre Kory, MD, G. Umberto Meduri, MD, Jose Iglesias, DO, Joseph Varon, MD, Keith
Berkowitz, MD, Howard Kornfeld, MD, Eivind Vinjevoll, MD, Scott Mitchell, MBChB, Fred Wagshul, MD, Paul E. Marik, MD. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). 2021

12. Jern P, Coffin JM. Effects of retroviruses on host genome function. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:709-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091501. PMID: 18694346.