After reading this I was slightly nauseaous. How on earth did these toxic experimental biologicals ever manage to get approval for administration to humans. Thank you for all your work here. The findings are horrific and hard to digest.🥲🥲
Great Britain News. Booster shots are failing bad. Official government data shows 3x the cases and nearly 4x the hospitalizations and deaths in boostered.
Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage
to
Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
The end point is always to be able to say, "We see no harm." which is then conflated to be "substantially equivalent" to demonstration of safety. Of course its roots are Rockefeller petrochemical regulatory influence so most widely used chemicals NEVER have basic safety testing. UC Davis who maintained Scorecard database pulled it offline in 2020.
"If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe."
Makes me hotter than a hornet and it's a staple on the food side of FDA studies where 90 days is long term study. Former Monsanto atty Michael Taylor in his revolving door appointment to head FDA used his evil genius to create a legal loophole known as substantial equivalent for gmo food so FDA looks at the similar elements like fiber, trace minerals and if it's close to traditional just wave off the novel elements and declare it safe.
State Dept then strong arms the rest of the world using "FDA approved" like a gold standard when it's an assurance of fraud and in the case of gmo no approval was required simply notice that assures liability is waived.
Thanks Jessica for another deep dive into their attempts to slip this under the gate, and explaining it to us in a way we can grasp. You are of course correct that the trials were way too short (and phases 1/2/3 lumped together instead of sequential like they are supposed to be), but one could easily argue that they were quite long enough to produce data that should prompt the authorities to say, a la Gershwin, “let’s call the whole thing off”.
In America we have the Fifth Amendment and the right to not testify against oneself. The WHO with their attempt for total global control will certainly not compel them, as the WHO will never again admit failure on any point. So I don't think they will ever admit anything negative about their product. In fact I suspect they will go to their grave still muttering "safe and effective."
The point is to get a vast majority of people to accept they were lied to, how they were lied to and the consequences to individuals and society.
An extra rib in the baby rats 😲! That final deletion looks more like a confession, I would guess some of those effects weren’t reversible after all. The bio distribution study dosage was halved after all (because they probably couldn’t keep the rats alive long enough).
This is so infuriating to see the Category B Designation for the “approved” jab. As a healthcare professional, I consult with our hospital pharmacy colleagues here and there regarding relatively benign, but actually studied therapeutics for use in our pregnant patients and it is nothing short of blatant blasphemy that this categorical designation has been achieved by the jabs!!!!!
Just ask any one of us working in the hospital....all of this is such a wicked web of lies. My heart breaks all shift long for humanity.
Is it typical to give test mice the same dose as humans? That's sounds counterintuitive. And, are we now going to see thousands of babies born with spinal column defects due to the extra ribs?
I believe you're correct- they'll HAVE to admit it. Which is also why I believe we're seeing other disasters come into play. I.e- the food chain supply, & even the medicinal supply we rely on from China will soon be realized (China lockdowns on manufacturing/shipping)
They've injected Billions of people with these. So the less they have around= Less people angry with them.
Make no mistake. They KNEW the facts would come out eventually, which is why they're going to aggressively target multiple avenues of control & De-Pop.
I have never understood why they are prepared to triple down. They have access to the same data our heros have available. They can read scientific data as well as our heros. They know they will be exposed.
If I read this correctly the spike protein is passed from mother to fetus, which means the baby is born with the gene altering/ed drug and its effects. Is this why they were prepared to lie/imply that the gene drug was safe for mothers. A RCT involving fetues? Maybe I am getting crazy.
This TGA report is old, Jan 11, 2021, rather than Jan 11, 2022 as you said. The latest AUSVaxSafety report is at: https://ausvaxsafety.org.au/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-adult-formulation/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-safety-data-all-participants It shows about 1% of vaccine takers showing adverse effects, most of them mild, as follows: "The majority reported missing 1 day or less. Most participants who reported not being able to do work or routine duties had lethargy, headache and joint pain. These are common adverse events linked to the immune response following immunisation and understandably have meant some people have chosen to rest after vaccination."
After reading this I was slightly nauseaous. How on earth did these toxic experimental biologicals ever manage to get approval for administration to humans. Thank you for all your work here. The findings are horrific and hard to digest.🥲🥲
Great Britain News. Booster shots are failing bad. Official government data shows 3x the cases and nearly 4x the hospitalizations and deaths in boostered.
Juicy bits starts at approximately 09:30
https://youtu.be/a8kdH2Xgf-k
These people don't *have* to do anything. They own the media. They don't just control the narrative, they create it.
"This means that they changed the rating from:
Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage
to
Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."
The end point is always to be able to say, "We see no harm." which is then conflated to be "substantially equivalent" to demonstration of safety. Of course its roots are Rockefeller petrochemical regulatory influence so most widely used chemicals NEVER have basic safety testing. UC Davis who maintained Scorecard database pulled it offline in 2020.
"If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe."
https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing
Makes me hotter than a hornet and it's a staple on the food side of FDA studies where 90 days is long term study. Former Monsanto atty Michael Taylor in his revolving door appointment to head FDA used his evil genius to create a legal loophole known as substantial equivalent for gmo food so FDA looks at the similar elements like fiber, trace minerals and if it's close to traditional just wave off the novel elements and declare it safe.
State Dept then strong arms the rest of the world using "FDA approved" like a gold standard when it's an assurance of fraud and in the case of gmo no approval was required simply notice that assures liability is waived.
http://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
Thanks Jessica for another deep dive into their attempts to slip this under the gate, and explaining it to us in a way we can grasp. You are of course correct that the trials were way too short (and phases 1/2/3 lumped together instead of sequential like they are supposed to be), but one could easily argue that they were quite long enough to produce data that should prompt the authorities to say, a la Gershwin, “let’s call the whole thing off”.
In America we have the Fifth Amendment and the right to not testify against oneself. The WHO with their attempt for total global control will certainly not compel them, as the WHO will never again admit failure on any point. So I don't think they will ever admit anything negative about their product. In fact I suspect they will go to their grave still muttering "safe and effective."
The point is to get a vast majority of people to accept they were lied to, how they were lied to and the consequences to individuals and society.
I hope so, but I worry that the famine will come first, and then chaos. That's their gambit.
An extra rib in the baby rats 😲! That final deletion looks more like a confession, I would guess some of those effects weren’t reversible after all. The bio distribution study dosage was halved after all (because they probably couldn’t keep the rats alive long enough).
This is so infuriating to see the Category B Designation for the “approved” jab. As a healthcare professional, I consult with our hospital pharmacy colleagues here and there regarding relatively benign, but actually studied therapeutics for use in our pregnant patients and it is nothing short of blatant blasphemy that this categorical designation has been achieved by the jabs!!!!!
Just ask any one of us working in the hospital....all of this is such a wicked web of lies. My heart breaks all shift long for humanity.
Is it typical to give test mice the same dose as humans? That's sounds counterintuitive. And, are we now going to see thousands of babies born with spinal column defects due to the extra ribs?
If we've learned nothing else during all this, we've at least learned that these people are extremely reluctant to admit they made any mistakes.
Thanks as always for your clear and comprehensive analysis.
I believe you're correct- they'll HAVE to admit it. Which is also why I believe we're seeing other disasters come into play. I.e- the food chain supply, & even the medicinal supply we rely on from China will soon be realized (China lockdowns on manufacturing/shipping)
They've injected Billions of people with these. So the less they have around= Less people angry with them.
Make no mistake. They KNEW the facts would come out eventually, which is why they're going to aggressively target multiple avenues of control & De-Pop.
I have never understood why they are prepared to triple down. They have access to the same data our heros have available. They can read scientific data as well as our heros. They know they will be exposed.
If I read this correctly the spike protein is passed from mother to fetus, which means the baby is born with the gene altering/ed drug and its effects. Is this why they were prepared to lie/imply that the gene drug was safe for mothers. A RCT involving fetues? Maybe I am getting crazy.
This TGA report is old, Jan 11, 2021, rather than Jan 11, 2022 as you said. The latest AUSVaxSafety report is at: https://ausvaxsafety.org.au/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-adult-formulation/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-safety-data-all-participants It shows about 1% of vaccine takers showing adverse effects, most of them mild, as follows: "The majority reported missing 1 day or less. Most participants who reported not being able to do work or routine duties had lethargy, headache and joint pain. These are common adverse events linked to the immune response following immunisation and understandably have meant some people have chosen to rest after vaccination."