32 Comments

After reading this I was slightly nauseaous. How on earth did these toxic experimental biologicals ever manage to get approval for administration to humans. Thank you for all your work here. The findings are horrific and hard to digest.🥲🥲

Expand full comment

Great Britain News. Booster shots are failing bad. Official government data shows 3x the cases and nearly 4x the hospitalizations and deaths in boostered.

Juicy bits starts at approximately 09:30

https://youtu.be/a8kdH2Xgf-k

Expand full comment

I live in the Devon. So very many we know, friends, neighbours, family have now all had covid, post triple vaxx. Most having what appears to be a cold with fatigue. Many of these same people are rushing to take the fourth jab! Many of them unfriended me when I told them the vaxxes were unsafe and didn’t work and to please not take them. Some even refused to travel by car with me because I was unvaxxed. So very many people we know now have debilitating musculoskeletal complaints as in severe pain and difficulty walking, sepsis, shingles, strokes, heart attacks, sepsis, vertigo (quite a few), a fib, serious lung infection, racing heart, blood clots, cancers (ovarian, pancreatic, lung, breast). I am a retired family NP. Given the lack of safety and efficacy data, I cannot understand how any medical professional would even consider administering these experimental biologicals. But they did.

Expand full comment

NP as in nurse practitioner? So like highly educated and have been around for a significant time? It's so daft of them to ignore your warnings and experience!

Mind you I had hardly any luck convincing anyone myself. Despite trying wildly.

Im a former special operations CBRNE medic. Current health and safety manager. Not an epidemiologist or immunologist but I'm not exactly Joe Blogg from the pub either.

Expand full comment

Funny, I recently refused to carpool with a bunch of jabbed and boostered people! Used a lame excuse. Don’t want to be around them in an enclosed environment! They’d probably do the same to me if they knew I’m unjabbed.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 23, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Unless your friends that died of covid died at home, I doubt they actually died of covid, but probably died of the hospital's treatment of covid. The local hospital here killed my friend with remdesivir, but they called it "covid pneumonia".

Expand full comment

🥲

Expand full comment

I have convinced several family members to quit the boosters but for the most part, either people saw through this early on, or they are entranced by all the gaslighting and can’t get past their cognitive dissonance.

Expand full comment

Thank you for posting that link.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing Steyn’s presentation. I miss him!

Expand full comment

These people don't *have* to do anything. They own the media. They don't just control the narrative, they create it.

Expand full comment

"This means that they changed the rating from:

Studies in animals have not shown evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage

to

Studies in animals are inadequate or may be lacking but available data show no evidence of an increased occurrence of fetal damage."

The end point is always to be able to say, "We see no harm." which is then conflated to be "substantially equivalent" to demonstration of safety. Of course its roots are Rockefeller petrochemical regulatory influence so most widely used chemicals NEVER have basic safety testing. UC Davis who maintained Scorecard database pulled it offline in 2020.

"If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe."

https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing

Makes me hotter than a hornet and it's a staple on the food side of FDA studies where 90 days is long term study. Former Monsanto atty Michael Taylor in his revolving door appointment to head FDA used his evil genius to create a legal loophole known as substantial equivalent for gmo food so FDA looks at the similar elements like fiber, trace minerals and if it's close to traditional just wave off the novel elements and declare it safe.

State Dept then strong arms the rest of the world using "FDA approved" like a gold standard when it's an assurance of fraud and in the case of gmo no approval was required simply notice that assures liability is waived.

http://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm

Expand full comment

Indeed! Immunologist Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld has stated that it can take up to six months for vaccine adjuvant-induced autoimmune antibodies to be detected, and the resulting autoimmune disorders - lupus; rheumatoid arthritis - up to eight years to display.

Expand full comment

Thanks Jessica for another deep dive into their attempts to slip this under the gate, and explaining it to us in a way we can grasp. You are of course correct that the trials were way too short (and phases 1/2/3 lumped together instead of sequential like they are supposed to be), but one could easily argue that they were quite long enough to produce data that should prompt the authorities to say, a la Gershwin, “let’s call the whole thing off”.

Expand full comment

that's the part that drives me nuts about the the people stuck in the drool-out-the-right-side-of-the-mouth narrative: it's all published. for everyone to see.

Expand full comment

I think some of the current problem comes from, besides the issue of way too few people knowing about/seeking out/comprehending the publicly available information that you are analyzing, is the “reduces severity of symptoms and hospitalizations” lie. A friend got very sick from “Covid” and was hospitalized. Fortunately she recovered and in spite of what I have shown her, she said she was so glad she got vaxxed because it would have been so much worse...

Expand full comment

There is no appropriate time schedule for vaccine trials, because vaccines - and genetically modified injections - are inappropriate. Were it not for the vaccine myth, the very idea of injecting disease - or components thereof - would sound as foolish and self-defeating as it really is.

Expand full comment

Agree. My pathologist father used to say: “Dont mess with your immune system” and “Don’t inject foreign substances into your body.” I never even considered getting the C19 jab. Never got the flu shots either. Will never even vax my cats in future, from what I’ve now learned.

Expand full comment

!!! Exactly. I'm antivax. That is, I'm an immune system intactivist.

Expand full comment

In America we have the Fifth Amendment and the right to not testify against oneself. The WHO with their attempt for total global control will certainly not compel them, as the WHO will never again admit failure on any point. So I don't think they will ever admit anything negative about their product. In fact I suspect they will go to their grave still muttering "safe and effective."

The point is to get a vast majority of people to accept they were lied to, how they were lied to and the consequences to individuals and society.

Expand full comment

I think it will become clear over time, as the unjabbed control group remains healthy while the jabbed sicken and die. I have profound pity for them, except the ones that were mean to me, sent me a nasty letter (!), disinvited me and even ran away (!) from me.

Expand full comment

Those are the ones who need your compassion the most.

Expand full comment

I hope so, but I worry that the famine will come first, and then chaos. That's their gambit.

Expand full comment

An extra rib in the baby rats 😲! That final deletion looks more like a confession, I would guess some of those effects weren’t reversible after all. The bio distribution study dosage was halved after all (because they probably couldn’t keep the rats alive long enough).

Expand full comment

This is so infuriating to see the Category B Designation for the “approved” jab. As a healthcare professional, I consult with our hospital pharmacy colleagues here and there regarding relatively benign, but actually studied therapeutics for use in our pregnant patients and it is nothing short of blatant blasphemy that this categorical designation has been achieved by the jabs!!!!!

Just ask any one of us working in the hospital....all of this is such a wicked web of lies. My heart breaks all shift long for humanity.

Expand full comment

Is it typical to give test mice the same dose as humans? That's sounds counterintuitive. And, are we now going to see thousands of babies born with spinal column defects due to the extra ribs?

Expand full comment

If we've learned nothing else during all this, we've at least learned that these people are extremely reluctant to admit they made any mistakes.

Expand full comment

Thanks as always for your clear and comprehensive analysis.

Expand full comment

I believe you're correct- they'll HAVE to admit it. Which is also why I believe we're seeing other disasters come into play. I.e- the food chain supply, & even the medicinal supply we rely on from China will soon be realized (China lockdowns on manufacturing/shipping)

They've injected Billions of people with these. So the less they have around= Less people angry with them.

Make no mistake. They KNEW the facts would come out eventually, which is why they're going to aggressively target multiple avenues of control & De-Pop.

Expand full comment

I have never understood why they are prepared to triple down. They have access to the same data our heros have available. They can read scientific data as well as our heros. They know they will be exposed.

If I read this correctly the spike protein is passed from mother to fetus, which means the baby is born with the gene altering/ed drug and its effects. Is this why they were prepared to lie/imply that the gene drug was safe for mothers. A RCT involving fetues? Maybe I am getting crazy.

Expand full comment

This TGA report is old, Jan 11, 2021, rather than Jan 11, 2022 as you said. The latest AUSVaxSafety report is at: https://ausvaxsafety.org.au/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-adult-formulation/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-safety-data-all-participants It shows about 1% of vaccine takers showing adverse effects, most of them mild, as follows: "The majority reported missing 1 day or less. Most participants who reported not being able to do work or routine duties had lethargy, headache and joint pain. These are common adverse events linked to the immune response following immunisation and understandably have meant some people have chosen to rest after vaccination."

Expand full comment

Ok now I’m confused…

Expand full comment