I can't believe how many people took these shots. I am not highly educated, but I knew that even the childhood vaxcis were bs starting 25 years ago with my first baby.
the fact that mRNA and LPN's do not stick around indefinitely, or at least degrade exponentially with time. . . what is the word? . . . sounds. . . good.
The fact that pharmokinetics are at least being sussed-out (as a Brit would say) would seem to indicate that high tech research is not being completely stifled by the PTB. This . . . seems. . . good.
The apparent fact that each individual's immune system is uniquely identifying and mustering resources as best it can . . . seems . . . good. This could indicate, potentially, if one is already in good immune health, he has an enhanced chance of reduced negative consequences of mRNA / LPN vaccination, injection. . . whatever.
Why are all the critics so reluctant to properly call them mRNA TRANSFECTIONS the decades old failed cancer therapy? Why can nobody explain that transfecting cell culture is the foundation to vaccinology that used synthetic clones to develop flu vaccines and that process of pure clone products is Gain of Function because RNA molecules lack fidelity to even grow in labs? How are we in 2024 and term vaccine is still used by theoretical critics of transfecting humans when we knew in 1999 from Jesse Gelsinger that human immune systems do NOT tolerate foreign proteins even when those missing proteins cause fatal illness? https://web.archive.org/web/20080517050534/http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19991128mag-stolberg.html
NIH funded 2016 Gryphon Scientific Review 1,000+ page analysis for Risks & Benefits of Gain of Function shows this does NOT make RNA molecules w pandemic potential but make best guess for traditional flu vaccines. How is the fundamental terminology & biology still missing?
What are the implications of an unvaxxed person receiving a blood transfusion from a donor of unknown vax status, although the odds are not in favor of it being unvaxxed blood? Do these studies suggest that if the donation was at least a month after the last vax, it might be safe(r)?
But for the fact my ancestors were fully vaccinated, I would not be here to make this comment. Or could it be that many comments are not here because their authors were vaccinated ?
Before 1986 "fully vaccinated" was 5 shots now it's 72 and we have the fattest sickest population in human history so your attribution for survival is a seriously limited picture.
Perhaps my sarcasm was too vague. There were no vaccines when my ancestors lived, thankfully, yet absent their ability to get vaccinated I am here. Likely because vaccines were not yet available to kill them. Likewise; I said many are not able to make comments here because they were killed by vaccines.
I can't believe how many people took these shots. I am not highly educated, but I knew that even the childhood vaxcis were bs starting 25 years ago with my first baby.
OK, well optimistically speaking:
the fact that mRNA and LPN's do not stick around indefinitely, or at least degrade exponentially with time. . . what is the word? . . . sounds. . . good.
The fact that pharmokinetics are at least being sussed-out (as a Brit would say) would seem to indicate that high tech research is not being completely stifled by the PTB. This . . . seems. . . good.
The apparent fact that each individual's immune system is uniquely identifying and mustering resources as best it can . . . seems . . . good. This could indicate, potentially, if one is already in good immune health, he has an enhanced chance of reduced negative consequences of mRNA / LPN vaccination, injection. . . whatever.
Hmmmm... it seems a lot of athletes were/are horribly effected. "Good health" doesn't protect anyone from these poisons.
For sure and it was planned to be that way for the largest coverage in the sheeple.
Yeah, well. I am only an engineer Captain!
Generalizing a bit much am I?
Why are all the critics so reluctant to properly call them mRNA TRANSFECTIONS the decades old failed cancer therapy? Why can nobody explain that transfecting cell culture is the foundation to vaccinology that used synthetic clones to develop flu vaccines and that process of pure clone products is Gain of Function because RNA molecules lack fidelity to even grow in labs? How are we in 2024 and term vaccine is still used by theoretical critics of transfecting humans when we knew in 1999 from Jesse Gelsinger that human immune systems do NOT tolerate foreign proteins even when those missing proteins cause fatal illness? https://web.archive.org/web/20080517050534/http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19991128mag-stolberg.html
NIH funded 2016 Gryphon Scientific Review 1,000+ page analysis for Risks & Benefits of Gain of Function shows this does NOT make RNA molecules w pandemic potential but make best guess for traditional flu vaccines. How is the fundamental terminology & biology still missing?
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
What are the implications of an unvaxxed person receiving a blood transfusion from a donor of unknown vax status, although the odds are not in favor of it being unvaxxed blood? Do these studies suggest that if the donation was at least a month after the last vax, it might be safe(r)?
But for the fact my ancestors were fully vaccinated, I would not be here to make this comment. Or could it be that many comments are not here because their authors were vaccinated ?
Before 1986 "fully vaccinated" was 5 shots now it's 72 and we have the fattest sickest population in human history so your attribution for survival is a seriously limited picture.
Perhaps my sarcasm was too vague. There were no vaccines when my ancestors lived, thankfully, yet absent their ability to get vaccinated I am here. Likely because vaccines were not yet available to kill them. Likewise; I said many are not able to make comments here because they were killed by vaccines.