You don't have to look further then the WIT website. It specifically says that the code listed was for Covid 19. You don't need fact checkers or anyone telling you what to think or believe. All you have to do is go to the WIT site that Jessica posted above, go below the box and you will see the code was for Covid-19. It seems to me that …
You don't have to look further then the WIT website. It specifically says that the code listed was for Covid 19. You don't need fact checkers or anyone telling you what to think or believe. All you have to do is go to the WIT site that Jessica posted above, go below the box and you will see the code was for Covid-19. It seems to me that when they uodated this they forgot to update below the table which gives you the exact information pertaining to the code.
Right. I want to see an earlier version - if there was one that was refreshed before the summer of 2019. I'm not familiar with wayback - don't know how to navigate it.
Search way back machine, archive something will come up. You put the url into the box and click search. It will tell you how many times the site has been captured. You can click on the earliest dates, latest dates or anything in between. You can see changes that were made.
One more, likely final, straw. I couldn't find an earlier version of the WITS 300215 document. The reason I looked is simple: if the document was changed in September of 2020 to reflect medical kits instead of Covid-19 test kits, then it could have been changed earlier in 2020, as well, from medical kits to Covid-19 test kits. If it was, then the September, 2020 change isn't the red flag, the ostensible proof, it appears to be.
I went to a different fact check of the issue, but not because fact checkers tell me what to think or believe. Quite the opposite - I've fact-checked many supposed fact checks of information about vaccines, and about the gene therapy Covid injections brazenly labeled vaccines, and their warp speed trials. But I especially go to fact checkers when the information I'm researching seems to be a silver bullet, as in this case; when it seems too good to be true. The more critical the information, the more solid must be the evidence. What I found was,
"The World Bank told Reuters that these products and product codes predate COVID. They have been used since 2017 - not in relation to COVID-19 but labelled 'in much more technical terms that did not mention COVID'.
"In April 2020, the products were relabelled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly, including those attached to the data from 2017 and 2018, even if the products had not been used in relation to COVID-19 at the time."
I have no way of disproving that. Nor, I wager, do you or Dr. Rose, and though I have no doubt the powers that be are capable of these types of shenanigans, without absolute proof I wouldn't pass this 2018 Covid-19 medical kits issue on to anyone. A stretch, I admit, but It's almost like expecting to see a Centers for Depopulation Control sign outside the CDC. It demands foolproof evidence, and without access to an earlier 2020 version of the WITS document, we don't have it, thus we have no way of debunking the fact check.
I think you have to ask yourself why would WIT go as far back as 2018 to change a definition that makes no sense. It would make sense if what was exported changed the name in 2020 because that is when C19 supposedly began. To go back and change that information makes no sense at all. Also, if it was true that they changed it to Covid-19 why would it have been changed back to medical testing removing C19. We are talking 2018 exports. You need to use your best judgment but it is obvious that in 2020 at some point the export was described as C19 medical testing and then it was changed to take out C19. Ask yourself why it was changed. Again, this wasn't exports from 2020 it was exports from 2018. Why would they be messing with this information at all. The Sep date is shown in the wayback machine because it's an archive. Anyone can go in and archive a page so that later you can see changes. Someone happened to screen grab the 300215 data page and then someone else archived the page and it had changed.
"In April 2020, the products were relabelled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly, including those attached to the data from 2017 and 2018, even if the products had not been used in relation to COVID-19 at the time."
We simply have no way of showing that that's not true. Whether it's reasonable or not depends on the reader, but the information's most poignant use would be to change the minds of those very people who'll immediately go to the fact checkers, and believe every word they read without question. Covid's been a fustercluck since day one. We know that. But we can't disprove that they changed medical kits to Covid-19 test kits in April of 2020, and frankly, it's not outside the realm of possibility, considering the worldwide, preposterous drive to label millions of healthy people sick, based solely on a test.
Any reasonable human being would realize that they would no reason to change anything from exports as far back as 2018. Also, if any reasonable person would go and look at "the fact checkers" "fact checks" they would realize they are almost never right and if they are it's a sentence that they twist and when you look at it in just the right light you may be able to see how they got to whatever conclusion. The fact they fact checked this at all tells me whoever posted it was over the target. If people can't see by now the corruption they can't be helped. These people that believe MSM, social media and the government after families died, were seriously injured, children died and all after the jab and they can't see what is going on it's because they are willfully blind and ignorant. This post was something Jessica was trying to show her readers you can't believe everything you hear. She then got more information and realized something didn't look right. If what they did made sense they wouldn't have added that bit about C19 in a 2018 export from WIT. It makes no sense, I don't belueve in coincidences. If these people don't believe that the jabs are killing people they will never believe that this has been planned for what seems like a couple years before the outbreak. It's not up to us to make sure this one thing is truth, it's up to them to prove it. It would have made sense if it would have said flu test kits but it didn't. It said C19 and then was changed. I ask you to explain to me why would a code be changed from a 2018 export report from C19 to medical testing kits? I don't need my mind changed but if you can do it successfully congrats. If someone argues this and they can't answer why the government or an arm of it would go into a document that is 2 years prior to Covid and change anything I would love to know.
Over the years I've had to retract a few posts on my own Facebook page because after I posted the information I could find no substantial proof, and the more momentous the claim, the greater the demand for substantiation. The claim that medical test kits were labeled Covid-19 test kits in 2017/2018 is nothing if not momentous. Indeed, most of the public would consider it outrageous. The fact check claims "In April 2020, the products were relabeled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly,..." It doesn't matter whether you believe it. It doesn't matter how reasonable I think it is. What matters is whether people whose minds I'm trying to change, who as a knee jerk reaction will immediately seek out fact checkers, will believe it.
You can have that opinion. It not mine. Did WIT or the fact checkers show proof of the claim? Nope. I am not going to trust the company being looked at for fraud. Thats like asking a killer if he killed this one person and he says "nope" and the cops say "okay" and walk away. Also, you continue to repeat what these fact checkers said. I don't trust them. Maybe your goal should be to show how often the fact checkers get it wrong.
You don't have to look further then the WIT website. It specifically says that the code listed was for Covid 19. You don't need fact checkers or anyone telling you what to think or believe. All you have to do is go to the WIT site that Jessica posted above, go below the box and you will see the code was for Covid-19. It seems to me that when they uodated this they forgot to update below the table which gives you the exact information pertaining to the code.
Oops. Looks like you're right, though I'd love to see a version of that 2018 list that was updated around May of 2019.
Nothing was captured on the way back machine until Sep 2020.
Here is the way back machine from sept 3 2020 the last time it was refreshed https://web.archive.org/web/20200904035459if_/https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
Right. I want to see an earlier version - if there was one that was refreshed before the summer of 2019. I'm not familiar with wayback - don't know how to navigate it.
Search way back machine, archive something will come up. You put the url into the box and click search. It will tell you how many times the site has been captured. You can click on the earliest dates, latest dates or anything in between. You can see changes that were made.
One more, likely final, straw. I couldn't find an earlier version of the WITS 300215 document. The reason I looked is simple: if the document was changed in September of 2020 to reflect medical kits instead of Covid-19 test kits, then it could have been changed earlier in 2020, as well, from medical kits to Covid-19 test kits. If it was, then the September, 2020 change isn't the red flag, the ostensible proof, it appears to be.
I went to a different fact check of the issue, but not because fact checkers tell me what to think or believe. Quite the opposite - I've fact-checked many supposed fact checks of information about vaccines, and about the gene therapy Covid injections brazenly labeled vaccines, and their warp speed trials. But I especially go to fact checkers when the information I'm researching seems to be a silver bullet, as in this case; when it seems too good to be true. The more critical the information, the more solid must be the evidence. What I found was,
"The World Bank told Reuters that these products and product codes predate COVID. They have been used since 2017 - not in relation to COVID-19 but labelled 'in much more technical terms that did not mention COVID'.
"In April 2020, the products were relabelled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly, including those attached to the data from 2017 and 2018, even if the products had not been used in relation to COVID-19 at the time."
I have no way of disproving that. Nor, I wager, do you or Dr. Rose, and though I have no doubt the powers that be are capable of these types of shenanigans, without absolute proof I wouldn't pass this 2018 Covid-19 medical kits issue on to anyone. A stretch, I admit, but It's almost like expecting to see a Centers for Depopulation Control sign outside the CDC. It demands foolproof evidence, and without access to an earlier 2020 version of the WITS document, we don't have it, thus we have no way of debunking the fact check.
I think you have to ask yourself why would WIT go as far back as 2018 to change a definition that makes no sense. It would make sense if what was exported changed the name in 2020 because that is when C19 supposedly began. To go back and change that information makes no sense at all. Also, if it was true that they changed it to Covid-19 why would it have been changed back to medical testing removing C19. We are talking 2018 exports. You need to use your best judgment but it is obvious that in 2020 at some point the export was described as C19 medical testing and then it was changed to take out C19. Ask yourself why it was changed. Again, this wasn't exports from 2020 it was exports from 2018. Why would they be messing with this information at all. The Sep date is shown in the wayback machine because it's an archive. Anyone can go in and archive a page so that later you can see changes. Someone happened to screen grab the 300215 data page and then someone else archived the page and it had changed.
The rationale they offered, again, was:
"In April 2020, the products were relabelled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly, including those attached to the data from 2017 and 2018, even if the products had not been used in relation to COVID-19 at the time."
We simply have no way of showing that that's not true. Whether it's reasonable or not depends on the reader, but the information's most poignant use would be to change the minds of those very people who'll immediately go to the fact checkers, and believe every word they read without question. Covid's been a fustercluck since day one. We know that. But we can't disprove that they changed medical kits to Covid-19 test kits in April of 2020, and frankly, it's not outside the realm of possibility, considering the worldwide, preposterous drive to label millions of healthy people sick, based solely on a test.
Any reasonable human being would realize that they would no reason to change anything from exports as far back as 2018. Also, if any reasonable person would go and look at "the fact checkers" "fact checks" they would realize they are almost never right and if they are it's a sentence that they twist and when you look at it in just the right light you may be able to see how they got to whatever conclusion. The fact they fact checked this at all tells me whoever posted it was over the target. If people can't see by now the corruption they can't be helped. These people that believe MSM, social media and the government after families died, were seriously injured, children died and all after the jab and they can't see what is going on it's because they are willfully blind and ignorant. This post was something Jessica was trying to show her readers you can't believe everything you hear. She then got more information and realized something didn't look right. If what they did made sense they wouldn't have added that bit about C19 in a 2018 export from WIT. It makes no sense, I don't belueve in coincidences. If these people don't believe that the jabs are killing people they will never believe that this has been planned for what seems like a couple years before the outbreak. It's not up to us to make sure this one thing is truth, it's up to them to prove it. It would have made sense if it would have said flu test kits but it didn't. It said C19 and then was changed. I ask you to explain to me why would a code be changed from a 2018 export report from C19 to medical testing kits? I don't need my mind changed but if you can do it successfully congrats. If someone argues this and they can't answer why the government or an arm of it would go into a document that is 2 years prior to Covid and change anything I would love to know.
Over the years I've had to retract a few posts on my own Facebook page because after I posted the information I could find no substantial proof, and the more momentous the claim, the greater the demand for substantiation. The claim that medical test kits were labeled Covid-19 test kits in 2017/2018 is nothing if not momentous. Indeed, most of the public would consider it outrageous. The fact check claims "In April 2020, the products were relabeled amid the pandemic and the WITS updated its product descriptions accordingly,..." It doesn't matter whether you believe it. It doesn't matter how reasonable I think it is. What matters is whether people whose minds I'm trying to change, who as a knee jerk reaction will immediately seek out fact checkers, will believe it.
You can have that opinion. It not mine. Did WIT or the fact checkers show proof of the claim? Nope. I am not going to trust the company being looked at for fraud. Thats like asking a killer if he killed this one person and he says "nope" and the cops say "okay" and walk away. Also, you continue to repeat what these fact checkers said. I don't trust them. Maybe your goal should be to show how often the fact checkers get it wrong.