59 Comments

What an interesting turn your life has taken these past few years. I’m so glad there are people out there who have the training and medical/research background and moxie to fight for what is right and true. God bless you from Saskatoon! 👍🏻🙏🏻

Expand full comment

You're a gift to human kind, Jessica! Long may you continue to make a positive influence on medical integrity and expose the charlatans.

Expand full comment

“injecting babies with gene therapy whilst calling it a vaccine against an extinct SARS-CoV variant.”

When you put it like that it sounds like kinda reckless. The you look at the injuries and deaths and it’s becoming to look like a crime.

Expand full comment

exactly. it is.

Expand full comment

It's the greatest crime in history, and many of my friends who watched all the great detectives on "Mystery" are totally oblivious to it.

Expand full comment

Agreed Mark. It's the greatest crime in history. Look forward to the day when the perps are rounded up and put on trial publically.

Expand full comment

Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory published June 2020 http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

Expand full comment

Thanks for the paper. I see that he died a month after it was written.

Expand full comment

The work of David Crowe on The Infectious Myth is valuable beyond measure. https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/the-quiet-one-david-crowe-died-one

Expand full comment

Please note the eerily prescient

Conclusions

The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified. Furthermore, even if the test can detect a novel virus the presence of a virus is not proof that it is the cause of the severe symptoms that some people who test positive experience (but not all who test positive). Finally, even if the test can detect a virus, and it is dangerous, we do not know what the rate of false positives is. And even a 1% false positive rate could produce 100,000 false positive results just in a city the size of Wuhan and could mean that a significant fraction of the positive test results being found are false positives.

The use of powerful drugs because doctors are convinced that they have a particularly potent virus on their hands, especially in older people, with pre-existing health conditions, is likely to lead to many deaths. As with SARS.

There is very little science happening. There is a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs. And, given enough time there will be a vaccine developed and, for some of the traumatized countries, it may become mandatory, even if developed after the epidemic has disappeared, so that proving that it reduces the risk of developing a positive test will be impossible.

Expand full comment

Drip the sarcasm Jess.

Make it ooooooze!!!

It seems "idiocracy" is alive and truth. People really don't understand the depth of "ridiculousness that we are now calling the "new normal".😐🤔😤😤😤🤐😭🤣😂🤣😂🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

#keepdoinUBoo #stayauthentic #callitout #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #getnoisy #localised

Expand full comment

roger dodger

Expand full comment

you are so correct.... I truly believe that this level of consciousness ( if you can call it that!) and the people who push it, are going to be the casualties of us headed in a positive new earth consciousness. (not going to say 'new world' as that has different connotations)!

Expand full comment

Jessica, I so love you — not only for your brilliance and expertise, but especially for your big heart, which comes through in both the tone and content of every presentation. The sheer authenticity of your closing words in this talk brought me to tears. Blessings and gratitude to you!🙏

Expand full comment

Knowing this poisoning was not a mistake has made me reassess the 'mistake factor' in all jabbed poisonings and chemicals such as glyphosate, and all the pesticides/fungicides and of course the petro fertilizers, graphene in makeup and so many products. We have been chemically assaulted these last 100 years to an extent that I feel a fool for initially accepting the mistake narrative; No longer the lambs being led to the slaughter, rather, stubborn mules who kick hard and will not be budged.

Expand full comment

FYI, I made a bumper sticker for my car

Not Safe, Not Effective and Not a mistake!

I think of it as my mobile substack.

Expand full comment

Thank you Jessica for your tremendous work and although you highlight VAERS, it would be good to know what Brazil or the countries you visit use, how they use them, are they publicly known and who is responsible for adding the data?

I say that, as I was completely clueless to what these were and never heard about them until 3+ years ago, and if I had, I would surely have questioned these many years ago and when we all "took for granted" all the jabs we had at school and never questioned anything.

The BIGGER picture also comes into play once you have aroused the curiosity to want to learn more and you start asking questions like WHY?

Why would anyone want to harm another person with a jab of sorts?

When you know this, you see everything!

I wanted to grow up on this beautiful planet being with human kind, actually "kind" and who serve one another. But my illusion and desires for that were burst when I was a small child, seeing through the poverty and the "haves and have nots".

Even though you mention the adverse events, the list is huge and if we were privy to what was in the jab, as in contents (and not hidden for 75 years), then we could make informed consent.

Which leads me to the fact non of us knew, so everyone that administered any jab, is reckless and should be struck off, at best, as they did not know either the content, the possible side effects or the safety. They just did as they were told and why question when your boss tells you?

I got suspicious when we were told it was only the elderly to worry about as anyone under 60 (I believe), in relatively good health, had a 99.997% chance of any more problems than a bad flu. And for any child, there was a 99.998% of absolutely nothing, you may not even notice anything.

So why, would anyone risk a new, novel, not tested over the given years for safety, a jab if you really would have such a high percentage of nothing happening and not even knowing if you caught the "so called" virus?

That is when I got very suspicious, but it seemed I was the tin foil hat wearer as I was 1 in a million that saw the lies. Just doing a bit of maths, you can ask a 5 year old to help out and ask. If there is a 99.998% of you not winning the lottery, would you bother buying a ticket and repeatedly keep doing this?

A 5 year old would know that answer, yet a qualified doctor after years of professional education, didn't!

Expand full comment

Dr. Jessica Rosie just viewed your slideshow short and sweet and right to the point you’re amazing thank you so much for what you do😊💕

Expand full comment

I wish you would highlight the other ~300 dead kids hiding in UNK age like these: https://www.vaersaware.com/kids-unk-age-deaths , and the ~30% of all reports with UNK AGE, yet about ~360K of these reports have age properly documented in the summary narrative. Thanks

Expand full comment

Thank you for your tireless efforts! Have a very Happy Thanksgiving!

Expand full comment

You too, however Jessica is Canadian (our Thanksgiving was over a month ago) and lives overseas. 😉

Expand full comment

Dr. Rose, it's clear you are averse to acknowledging 479,297 UNK AGE reports (~30%) or the extra 300 dead kids? I won't even mention the throttling, lot typos, dosing analysis issues. It's super clear you are mainly averse to me. It's disingenuous IMO when you can get very somber over 4 dead kids of inappropriate age from the pharmacy, when you know there are hundreds of dead kids with only a empty age field. I'll praise you for at least not deleting my previous comment. God Bless, if you believe in him.

Expand full comment

So, she's averse because she didn't include it in this presentation? And your credentials are, and can you back them up? I thought she did great. Got to the point. Used the minimum needed examples to make it - examples that brought it home. Showed graphs that clearly demonstrated the breadth, depth, and range of the problem, beyond those examples. I suspect your job is to follow her around and target her?

Expand full comment

Looks a little stalky to me.

Expand full comment

Ok, if you say so, we are allowed to have selective perception. This comment on Jess's stack is my very first one ever! Steve Kirsch has pulled us into several email threads, sometimes just the three of us. So it's clear you don't have the full picture, nor have you even visited my work or humongous Bitchute site? So this is all you got? I'm a little stalky? The truth defends itself. Nice echo chamber...

Expand full comment

It's rude to call someone out publicly like this in the manner and tone you use. Yeah. It comes across stalky. If you're so close, why not take it privately. Look, if some public figure doesn't do what you want them to after several tries, then they don't want to do what you're asking and likely have their own reasons that are really none of our business. Don't you think it's time to let it go? If you think what you have to say is so important, why not find other ways to share that information around? You could make flyers and reach your neighbours. You could start a website. I did for just that purpose. The stalkiness is in the persistence in trying to get someone to do something you think is important and not letting go of it, and doing it publicly in such a way that it could harm them. It comes across controlling actually to me. Sorry. Pls. have the last word.

Expand full comment

In this exchange, my work has nothing to do with anything. There is not 200 dead kids in VAERS, there is 500 dead kids, look at little harder. I wouldn't bug if the world was off 20-30%, but when there is more than 2x the dead kids, somebody should say something no? I was told by her "the data is bad enough". No worries, I now have something to chirp about in my own lane. I won't be leaving any more comments on this stack. The data is bad enough, and Jess's work is better than nothing. I like to do my job well. Just a sample: https://www.vaersaware.com/kids-unk-age-deaths

Expand full comment

Obrigado

Expand full comment

Well done 👏🏼👏🏼

Expand full comment

Fascist capture of government and media by Big Pharma is the only rational explanation at this point.

The near complete lack of integrity in people that could make a difference and save lives and prevent suffering... is astonishing. Mind boggling to people like us.

Keep fighting the good fight and thank you!

Expand full comment

Hawk if this is true, explain how they have two diverging and opposing goals:

• make as much money as possible; creating further ill health caused by harmful products

• kill as many people as possible without creating a stir

These two goals seem incompatible with each other which says to me that we are dealing with two different groups of perpetrators. One clearly visible and one clearly hidden.

Expand full comment

Government wants to eliminate the elderly, and Big Medicine/Big Pharma want to sicken people to continue to sell their wares and profit?

Mainstream media cannot go against either... so they make money by not doing any real investigative journalism. The government and Big Pharma are two of their biggest revenue sources by far the last nearly 4 years.

Expand full comment

Hawk, but when you say Government, are you referring to US? But what we are witnessing is an attack against the entire Western world, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, etc. This vaxx push was global in scope. Are you saying the western caucasian world leaders decided in a type of a "Wannasee" moment to push genocide of humanity? Its clearly more than elderly in that they targeted children in the womb, young children and youths very susceptible to the adverse reaction.

Expand full comment

Many governments - why I did not specify just one.

It could all just be a whoopsie too but I don’t think all those people profiting off this are that stupid.

Expand full comment

But they have to get rid of their stock. Inventory has to turn over!

Expand full comment

Steve Kirsch, you amazing GLADIATOR WAR HORSE, TENACITY AND DRIVE EQUIVALENT TO NUCLEAR FISSION.

YOUR ON A TOTAL VICTORY MARCH NOW, DON'T STOP, HAVNT YOU NOTICED YET??? NOBODY HAS BEEN ABLE TO STOP YOU.... KEEP TRAMPING THEM STEVE... UNTIL THEY ARE BUT DUST

Expand full comment

🙄 Except this is not Steve. This Gladiator is Jessica.

Credit where credit's due.

Expand full comment

i think this is a bot. they've recently infiltrated substack...

Expand full comment

Yep, they're everywhere.

I flag them when I find them.

And block them when they "subscribe".

There ought to be a "are you a human" pop up for the purpose of identifying bots.

"Click on photos with stairs"...

Expand full comment