Yes... nothing to see indeed! The direct correlation between m[iracle]RNA toxic spew COVIDIUS jabs and death - particularly among the MMS age >65 is truly a "nothing to see" event!
I am certain this is not a mere coincidence. The number of excess deaths is concerning. The number of cases of cancer is alarming. Something is going on. We are truly under assault.
Hi Lisa. Sepsis is also going through the roof! The numbers of people whose immune systems seem unable to fight off respiratory infections, bladder infections and skin infections are at unprecedented levels in the little hospital where I work. (California)
Dec 3, 2023·edited Dec 3, 2023Liked by Jessica Rose
Holy hell, Jessica. This is at least circumstantial evidence of a sinister plot.
Seven-fold differences in relative proportions of seriousness would not likely arise "naturally" because that would require that they be attributed to the underlying "genetic/metabolic differences."
However, one of the biggest metabolic differences recorded is for impaired glucose tolerance -- i.e., North America vs. Southeast Asia: a 2.9-fold difference in prevalence [PMID: 37196350] -- but that difference between people is mostly only a difference between the diets of people, not a true difference between people.
It is not expected for the same thing to "naturally" (accidentally) cause 7 times the damage in "certain" populations.
Interestingly, Vietnam began accumulating excess deaths in late summer of 2021 but Taiwan did not begin to accumulate any excess deaths until early summer of 2022.
I’m hosting 4 Vietnamese male high school exchange students (2 of the 4 are brothers). I haven’t broached this topic previously, but I’m sure they will be happy to answer any questions you may have.
I remember in 2021 an article from Taiwan News pointing out that the number of deaths after the Covid shots was higher than the number of deaths from Covid. I found the article recently with a search on a browser. I also remember an article about how Taiwan stopped giving the shots to young people because they noticed the explosion of myocarditis.
'look the other way' was/is also the way that some are still convinced that the jab 'helped' covid number. well, they stopped testing every person for no reason, with an inaccurate test, as soon as the jab came out. they counted sick folks as unvaxxed if 14 day had not passed since second jab...
Under US Law, post-marketing surveillance is mandatory. That is why, for example, Pfizer Periodic Safety Reports (PSURs) are required by the FDA. That must include all Foreign Reports. The TGA in Australia, for example, must forward all Serious Adverse Reaction reports to the DAEN to America.
Yes, and that sneaky use of the word "unexpected" is exploited by BigPharma when they change the label after they dscover a signal in the post-marketing phase.
Dr. Yeadon pointed to the extreme disparities between batches, as prima facie evidence of a criminal experiment. According to him uniformity of product is one of the key requirements for vaccine manufacture. The kind of marked levels of injuries for some batches, and not others, seen at https://howbadismybatch.com/ - indicated a malign experiment, foul play, or unconscionable negligence. Sending batches of differing lethality to targeted populations would also point in these directions.
We know that the Billionaires want to retreat to NZ, to ride out the last war they have planned, in their bunkers, there.... Perhaps eliminating most of the Maoris and the Kiwi colonials is part of the plan, too. It sounds from other news that some Government officials down there were allowed to escape the slaughter, in exchange for herding the population into the slaughterhouse.
My family all thought I was a kook with too dark an imagination when, years before Covid I cautioned that vaccines were the perfect tool, the perfect delivery system for any nefarious actors to harm the public en mass. Or for an accidental harm through just not knowing what the manufacturers doon't know about how their product's overall effect will play out. Oddly they still think the same of me.
During Steve Kirsch's recent presentation at MIT, a WPI (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) professor Stephen Bitar said that his school had 7 "suicides" recently, but, he knew of one student personally, who wasn't a "suicide". The school obviously doesn't want "suicides" to be found out to be "vaccine" related,
as the school would be in big trouble as it mandated the "vaccines".
and just today .. DMED database of just helicopter pilots .. sliced and diced ..and the data pops out. Smaller datasets are more easily tracked and traced, and tougher to hide.
I can track 200 data points easier than 200,000 ... but, I do have to track 200 and 200 and 200 to make any "proof" that the data wasn't just a fluke of a small dataset. But, when you have more and more small datasets showing large dangers .. it becomes obvious to all, more than one massive government run trial that no one can deciper properly. More and more people saying the same thing is more important that a Dr. Fauci declaring to be Dr. Science and he can't be challenged. BTW, the whistle blower from New Zealand has been arrested. No personal data was released, but, he didn't get the proper Big Brother authority to release government data. So, the powers that be, are not amused and he will be punished.
Is it possible that some cultures would be less concerned (and thus, less likely to report to VAERS) about redness, bruising, tenderness or mild swelling, skewing the data you are seeing? Some cultures may also be more perfectionistic and diligent about reporting every single data point and variance including less intense post-vaccination adverse effects.
I agree there must be some degree of bias. Even people within the US tend to have different thresholds. I keep picturing the Monty Python - 'merely a flesh wound' scene.
Is it possible that countries that don't have robust vaccine reporting systems unlike say the EU or UK are notifying the manufacturer more, whereas the countries that do have a system are in some way splitting the results by having multiple reporting paths?
right. sounds like dispersion technique to me. especially when i started reading about product being 'given' to 'other countries'. what like when they 'give out' product that is deemed unsafe by one countries' standards - just give it to another?
VAERS occasionally receives case reports from U.S. manufacturers that were reported to their foreign subsidiaries. Under FDA regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and unexpected (in other words, it does not appear in the product labeling), they are required to submit it to VAERS. These case reports are of variable data quality and completeness, due to the differences in country reporting practices.
China has a more protective definition of High Grade Fever than America, which was one of the reasons China did not like the Pfizer trial testing effects in their citizens and decided not to proceed with mass jabbing.
Here's my understanding of the Foreign Reports in VAERS: If a U.S. pharmaceutical company which manufactures vaccines has a subsidiary in a foreign country that sells the U.S. company's vaccines, that subsidiary is required to report Serious Adverse Events. I don't know for sure whether these reports are made directly to VAERS, or to the U.S. pharmaceutical company, which sends them on to VAERS, but I think it's the latter. I think these reports comprise the vast majority of FR reports in VAERS; and since the requirement is to report Serious Adverse Events, it's not surprising that the % of FR reports that are SAEs is much higher than the % of U.S. domestic reports that are SAEs. I think it's possible for an individual citizen or health care provider to file an FR report, but I think at least pre-spikeshots, this type of report was unusual.
I've been wracking my brain trying to remember where I got this information about the FR reports. I've been interested in VAERS a long time and have gotten info from many sources, but I have a vague memory of reading an official explanation of Foreign Reports at a U.S. federal website (FDA? VAERS - WONDER?).
It is like a nothing to see here folks. Look, we do have a safe and effective product (poison). Those alarmists are full of nonsense.
Yes... nothing to see indeed! The direct correlation between m[iracle]RNA toxic spew COVIDIUS jabs and death - particularly among the MMS age >65 is truly a "nothing to see" event!
https://postimg.cc/v4h2ZQG3
All around the Planet the same thing happened... Mere coincidence.
I am certain this is not a mere coincidence. The number of excess deaths is concerning. The number of cases of cancer is alarming. Something is going on. We are truly under assault.
Hi Lisa. Sepsis is also going through the roof! The numbers of people whose immune systems seem unable to fight off respiratory infections, bladder infections and skin infections are at unprecedented levels in the little hospital where I work. (California)
And liver damage and kidney damage...those too.
NZ excess deaths data whistleblower house raided, arrested. Appearing in Wellington court 10am tomorrow. Anyone in Wellington free to go to court?
https://t.me/KiwiandSue/14097
Data dump on dashboard (see also Steve Kirsch on data dump)
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/bombshell-nz-whistleblower-data-here
4x MOAR videos with Liz Gunn, Bridgen, Osterhuis
https://rumble.com/c/FreeNZ
Where is Liz Gunn now? https://t.me/KiwiandSue/14098
===========
EDIT: Counterspin Media (our side) looking for someone to report for them from Wellington
https://t.me/counterspin/3056?comment=27955
Please DM me if you are in Wellington and can report for us
Holy hell, Jessica. This is at least circumstantial evidence of a sinister plot.
Seven-fold differences in relative proportions of seriousness would not likely arise "naturally" because that would require that they be attributed to the underlying "genetic/metabolic differences."
However, one of the biggest metabolic differences recorded is for impaired glucose tolerance -- i.e., North America vs. Southeast Asia: a 2.9-fold difference in prevalence [PMID: 37196350] -- but that difference between people is mostly only a difference between the diets of people, not a true difference between people.
It is not expected for the same thing to "naturally" (accidentally) cause 7 times the damage in "certain" populations.
Interestingly, Vietnam began accumulating excess deaths in late summer of 2021 but Taiwan did not begin to accumulate any excess deaths until early summer of 2022.
I’m hosting 4 Vietnamese male high school exchange students (2 of the 4 are brothers). I haven’t broached this topic previously, but I’m sure they will be happy to answer any questions you may have.
please ask and let me know... :) you can give them my email too.
I remember in 2021 an article from Taiwan News pointing out that the number of deaths after the Covid shots was higher than the number of deaths from Covid. I found the article recently with a search on a browser. I also remember an article about how Taiwan stopped giving the shots to young people because they noticed the explosion of myocarditis.
Obfuscation by complication.
the usual MO
This matches up perfectly with Deborah Conrad’s personal anecdotes describing the ultimatum to look the other way — stop filling out reports.
'look the other way' was/is also the way that some are still convinced that the jab 'helped' covid number. well, they stopped testing every person for no reason, with an inaccurate test, as soon as the jab came out. they counted sick folks as unvaxxed if 14 day had not passed since second jab...
Under US Law, post-marketing surveillance is mandatory. That is why, for example, Pfizer Periodic Safety Reports (PSURs) are required by the FDA. That must include all Foreign Reports. The TGA in Australia, for example, must forward all Serious Adverse Reaction reports to the DAEN to America.
yes. i wonder how many abide by this under penalty... nothing is as it should be.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632204/pdf/nihms-732970.pdf
Yes, and that sneaky use of the word "unexpected" is exploited by BigPharma when they change the label after they dscover a signal in the post-marketing phase.
Dr. Yeadon pointed to the extreme disparities between batches, as prima facie evidence of a criminal experiment. According to him uniformity of product is one of the key requirements for vaccine manufacture. The kind of marked levels of injuries for some batches, and not others, seen at https://howbadismybatch.com/ - indicated a malign experiment, foul play, or unconscionable negligence. Sending batches of differing lethality to targeted populations would also point in these directions.
We know that the Billionaires want to retreat to NZ, to ride out the last war they have planned, in their bunkers, there.... Perhaps eliminating most of the Maoris and the Kiwi colonials is part of the plan, too. It sounds from other news that some Government officials down there were allowed to escape the slaughter, in exchange for herding the population into the slaughterhouse.
My family all thought I was a kook with too dark an imagination when, years before Covid I cautioned that vaccines were the perfect tool, the perfect delivery system for any nefarious actors to harm the public en mass. Or for an accidental harm through just not knowing what the manufacturers doon't know about how their product's overall effect will play out. Oddly they still think the same of me.
During Steve Kirsch's recent presentation at MIT, a WPI (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) professor Stephen Bitar said that his school had 7 "suicides" recently, but, he knew of one student personally, who wasn't a "suicide". The school obviously doesn't want "suicides" to be found out to be "vaccine" related,
as the school would be in big trouble as it mandated the "vaccines".
https://rumble.com/v3yovx4-vsrf-live-104-exclusive-mit-speech-by-steve-kirsch.html?start=7215
How much can one trust the death certificate data, concerning Covid-19?
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2021/12/22/covid-deaths-obscured-inaccurate-death-certificates/8899157002/
How much can one trust the Foreign online reports of obituaries?
https://makismd.substack.com/p/fake-obituaries-are-being-created
I think one has to slice and dice down to manageable populations with tracking data
that might show things rather starkly.
i.e. Teenagers suddenly dying of heart attacks over the years.
How many teenagers die from heart attacks or other non obvious reasons?
(i.e. car accidents, drowning etc). The number of teenagers suddenly dying in High School sports
or at home in the middle of the night for no apparent reason seems to be going up.
Or, is all this just antidotal rare reports? This is one area that should stick out like a sore thumb.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-excess-deaths-covid-died-suddenly-793316776380
Pilot deaths are tracked in databases and studied. Those should be a population to follow, as they
watch their health very carefully as does the aviation medical examiners. And most all were forced to take the "vaccine"
https://makismd.substack.com/p/pilot-incapacitation-american-airlines
If the governments of the world are hiding "their" data, then we have to start tracking things with our own databases, because
we can't depend on the governments databases to be truthful or transparent.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/ournhs/we-need-urgent-answers-about-massive-nhs-covid-data-deal/
and just today .. DMED database of just helicopter pilots .. sliced and diced ..and the data pops out. Smaller datasets are more easily tracked and traced, and tougher to hide.
https://twitter.com/Risemelbourne/status/1729337006914990526
I can track 200 data points easier than 200,000 ... but, I do have to track 200 and 200 and 200 to make any "proof" that the data wasn't just a fluke of a small dataset. But, when you have more and more small datasets showing large dangers .. it becomes obvious to all, more than one massive government run trial that no one can deciper properly. More and more people saying the same thing is more important that a Dr. Fauci declaring to be Dr. Science and he can't be challenged. BTW, the whistle blower from New Zealand has been arrested. No personal data was released, but, he didn't get the proper Big Brother authority to release government data. So, the powers that be, are not amused and he will be punished.
Excellent comment! A special thank you for the links so us "Do your own research" people can follow up.
May I have your email address? I have some information that can help with this.
I’m a surviving spouse, my husband died from a jj vac in 2021 and since then, I have been researching why.
sure, you can write directly from the email you got when i posted :)
Thank you
Is it possible that some cultures would be less concerned (and thus, less likely to report to VAERS) about redness, bruising, tenderness or mild swelling, skewing the data you are seeing? Some cultures may also be more perfectionistic and diligent about reporting every single data point and variance including less intense post-vaccination adverse effects.
Just a thought...
I agree there must be some degree of bias. Even people within the US tend to have different thresholds. I keep picturing the Monty Python - 'merely a flesh wound' scene.
Is it possible that countries that don't have robust vaccine reporting systems unlike say the EU or UK are notifying the manufacturer more, whereas the countries that do have a system are in some way splitting the results by having multiple reporting paths?
right. sounds like dispersion technique to me. especially when i started reading about product being 'given' to 'other countries'. what like when they 'give out' product that is deemed unsafe by one countries' standards - just give it to another?
https://imgur.com/gallery/FElFyw6
VAERS occasionally receives case reports from U.S. manufacturers that were reported to their foreign subsidiaries. Under FDA regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and unexpected (in other words, it does not appear in the product labeling), they are required to submit it to VAERS. These case reports are of variable data quality and completeness, due to the differences in country reporting practices.
China has a more protective definition of High Grade Fever than America, which was one of the reasons China did not like the Pfizer trial testing effects in their citizens and decided not to proceed with mass jabbing.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-biontech-covid19-jab-multiple
Bullseye 🎯 Jessica 🎯
Here's my understanding of the Foreign Reports in VAERS: If a U.S. pharmaceutical company which manufactures vaccines has a subsidiary in a foreign country that sells the U.S. company's vaccines, that subsidiary is required to report Serious Adverse Events. I don't know for sure whether these reports are made directly to VAERS, or to the U.S. pharmaceutical company, which sends them on to VAERS, but I think it's the latter. I think these reports comprise the vast majority of FR reports in VAERS; and since the requirement is to report Serious Adverse Events, it's not surprising that the % of FR reports that are SAEs is much higher than the % of U.S. domestic reports that are SAEs. I think it's possible for an individual citizen or health care provider to file an FR report, but I think at least pre-spikeshots, this type of report was unusual.
I've been wracking my brain trying to remember where I got this information about the FR reports. I've been interested in VAERS a long time and have gotten info from many sources, but I have a vague memory of reading an official explanation of Foreign Reports at a U.S. federal website (FDA? VAERS - WONDER?).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632204/pdf/nihms-732970.pdf
Interesting article -- thanks! Answered some questions I've had about the "internal workings" of the VAERS system, like the MedRA coding.