This is great. Just listening to CBC today (Lower Mainland BC) and interviewing some ER doc who's the head of such and such, discussing why there is such a shortage of docs and nurses in BC. So perfect: the first caller said that a minimum of 1800 doctors had been fired for not getting the shots! I find it so interesting to see how the 'narrative' folks respond. The ER doc said Canada has shown that the mRNA shots are the measure against Covid and he, in fact, has had 7 inections since the start of Covid, including all the boosters, shingles and flu. But 'he'd have to look at the records.' He thought many of those had been reinstated. These people just will not relent.
I wonder how long that ER doctor is for this world if he’ll take 7 of these death jabs?!?!?! Well, I guess he is helping to self select his own removal from the gene pool a bit quicker, sad to say for his family. How can such ‘smart’ people be so fearful and dumb?!??!
I know 2 couples who just got their 7th. I talk to my closest friend often about all I read about the devastating effects plus I’m injured. I got her to watch Dr. Phillip Buckhaults South Carolina senate hearing to no avail. She and her husband just got their 7th. The only thing she focused on when watching Buckhaults was the part where he says he’d still give it to 65 yr olds and up.
If they are getting enough of it, vitamin D3 supposedly will largely or entirely take care of Covid all my itself. With each shot being weaker than the last, that's not a big accomplishment. I know nothing about D3's ability to handle the spike protein but other supplements do.
BC is the province of brain dead insanity. Everyone has the right to an opinion but nobody has the right to impose their opinions on others. If anyone wants to take the experimental jab then it is their option but these stalinist droids have no right to impose their skanky death wish demands on others,
The lead guy is an old Columbia professor named Racaniello, and he has awarded himself the title of Earth’s Virology Professor. He was one of the guys in the e-mail chain with Fauci and others that has been revealed through FOIA, even though they went to great lengths to hide their correspondence and used burner phones. We’re four years into their bioweapon and he is one of the loudest voices still pushing the Racoon Dog/Pangolin idea.
In today’s podcast they speculate about how great self-amplifying spike-encoded Covid vaccine might be, because, well why not? When the conversation drifts into the topic of what could go wrong, they deftly segue away from such dangerous thoughts. Racaniello makes the comment that the mRNA vaccines have always remained in the upper arm at the injection site, even though some may think that don’t. Wow. We’re three years into this madness and there are hundreds of papers on biodistribution and accumulation throughout the body, including transfer of spike through mother’s breast milk to the infant. It’s as if these people live in a parallel universe!
At this point, another guy pipes up with, “That’s the kind of question the SAFETY WONKS will be paying attention to and wanting an answer to”. Wow. When you’re shilling for Big Pharma, you categorize the population who have a bit of skepticism as safety wonks.
Covid-19 has never been able to give a visible increase in the overall number of yearly deaths. There is a very difficult proof, but there is also a very easy proof. The very easy one is the unincreased average number of chronic conditions in the group of official Covid-19 victims in the U.S. when compared to that of alive ones with exactly the same age structure:
" ...Even just the average number of chronic conditions protects the main result, which number must have been strongly increased among alive ones (but not already in a terminal state) and then really killed by the virus against the number in a comparative group of just alive ones with exactly the same age-structure (!), because Covid-19 out of infected ones at every specific age kills very few (of older ones) or extremely few (of younger ones) of them -usually weaker/weakest ones. The CDC knew there had to be a very clear correlation between 'Covid-19 Death Risk Ratio' and a number of conditions, but in the "Deaths involving Covid-19" (DIC) group none increase in the average number was visible (/officially only <3 conditions) even with limiting the list of conditions in the comparative group to the conservative CCW list (/comparison only of the prevalence of major hearth diseases shows it is unincreased in the DIC group -'Additional Notes -c'), what was possible if a share of real Covid-19 deaths in the DIC group was very small. If a person has a high number of CCW-conditions then what matters most to life expectancy is that pure number of conditions; the marginal decline in life expectancy increases with an additional chronic condition, when a number of conditions is low or moderate, but this decline starts with low values -first 2 conditions of 2008-CCW ones (and so approximately first 3 of actual CCW ones) sum up to about 3 times less negative effect on life expectancy than the next 2 conditions (3+4) of 2008-CCW do in 75-year old ones (= approximately 4+5+6 of actual CCW ones). /E.g. normally, still alive ones at age 67 and 75 with a low number (0 - 3) of actual CCW-conditions should otherwise live, on average, for the next approximately 22 and 16 years respectively, but with a very high number (14/15 - 30) of conditions they would otherwise live for the next approximately 5 and 4.5 years only./ "
"c) In the analysis it is assumed there still could be an increase in the average number of chronic conditions in the DIC group, even if the official number of conditions was decreased by >2 against the calculated CCW-norm of ⩾5 for alive ones with the same age-structure, due to some of heterogeneity in included in different observations conditions. As it was checked later (CDC.gov -Provisional Death Counts for COVID-19, Page 3 -Table 3) e.g. normally of a record high prevalence Hypertension was ignored on the 'Covid-19 death certificates' (only 'Hypertensive (hearth) disease' given instead), the same Demenia and Alzheimer (strongly underreported), there are not 'Chronic Kidney Diseases' but only 'Renal failure' instead; the summary prevalence of 'All other conditions' + Injuries -was 3 times smaller than of conditions which are additionally listed on the CCW list. On the other hand there was a 4-times bigger total prevalence of diseases of the respiratory system (especially due to 'Influenza and Pneumonia' and 'Respiratory failure' + 'Adult respiratory distress syndrome' -but mainly because the latest two are absent on the CCW list); to make the comparison a considerable part of this excess must be deducted, also because only conditions existing before the infection (so not secondary pneumonia) and those not being a result of falling into a terminal state can be counted (!). Obesity or Sepsis are not on the CCW list at all. ...Even just the total prevalence of major hearth diseases (excluding later added to the CCW list Hypertension, and so also 'Hypertensive disease', and not belonging there 'Cardial arrest') give precious information. These diseases are 'Number one' of causes of chronic disease death, so it is difficult to assume its important underreporting on the "Covid-19 death certificates" and simultaneously it is hard to assume that having another disease concerning one of the rest of different systems instead make someone, on average, apparently easier to get infected with Covid-19; thus this prevalence should be clearly increased if there were genuine Covid-19 deaths, but in the DIC group the official one is unincreased. /Before adjusting (early April 2021) by the CDC the average number to 4, the official number was under 3 conditions. However the number is still only <3, because we can calculate in the CDC table that the average number almost 4 is with added 'Covid-19' as a condition, so its no "4.0 additional conditions", but a bit short of 3./."
It questions the credentials of various speakers, with denigrating but brief fragments about their 'baggage' - including Dr. Rose. She is dismissed as "an independent researcher" [although in the story lead-in, this was included: "Dr. Jessica Rose (who recently testified to the US Congress about the plasma DNA in the injections,]
Three of the 6 presenters' dismissals were: "not a medical doctor",
"a pediatrician who sued..... Alberta ", and "is a veterinarian"
BIO'S OF THESE 6 AND 3 OTHERS ARE PRESENTED IN THE PROMOTIONAL PAGE, They shed a MUCH MORE FLATTERING LIGHT on the presenters, some of whom have co-authored
Ever the relaxed woman of excellence, intelligence and candor backed by a focus grounded in the reality of fact, truth and substance of character. It was Isaac Isamov decades ago who penned an article "Praise Excellence" whereby he urged others to do just that. I have tended to do that, but on the other end of the scale have condemned errancy, lies and evil. Today evil, darkness and death clothe themselves in the self righteous maggotry of ignorance, seeking to influence others to forsake Truth and take the yellow brick road of destruction. Leaders so called are liars of loony and archaic assininity, clad in the rags of ignorance, deception and damnation.
Innocent men, women and children are their victims but their silent repose in death bears witness to who truly is right, and who truly is wrong. Murder in any way is condemned, a sin unto death, be it by needle/fake jab or at the hand of a terrorist using a gun, a knife or a suicide vest.
Once again I praise and am awed by brave women in the midst of the battle for life wherever or whatever means they use to defend Truth. Can I do less? But the question is can I do more? Jessica the "Rose" is a symbol of much needed Truth in this age of lies and liars, pushing a death wish on others from the young to to old. who are innocent but willing victims of the enemy that is anything but good.
It is in the wee small hours of the morning again I awaken and feel immense gratitude towards those in the battle who have offered themselves as willing defenders of Truth and Justice. I cherish each and every one of them whoever and whatever and wherever they be.
Agree but then think well, we’ve ignored the crazies to our detriment the past six decades and look where we are now. When a liberal tells you who they are and what they plan to do believe them. Time to fight!!!
This is great. Just listening to CBC today (Lower Mainland BC) and interviewing some ER doc who's the head of such and such, discussing why there is such a shortage of docs and nurses in BC. So perfect: the first caller said that a minimum of 1800 doctors had been fired for not getting the shots! I find it so interesting to see how the 'narrative' folks respond. The ER doc said Canada has shown that the mRNA shots are the measure against Covid and he, in fact, has had 7 inections since the start of Covid, including all the boosters, shingles and flu. But 'he'd have to look at the records.' He thought many of those had been reinstated. These people just will not relent.
I wonder how long that ER doctor is for this world if he’ll take 7 of these death jabs?!?!?! Well, I guess he is helping to self select his own removal from the gene pool a bit quicker, sad to say for his family. How can such ‘smart’ people be so fearful and dumb?!??!
I know 2 couples who just got their 7th. I talk to my closest friend often about all I read about the devastating effects plus I’m injured. I got her to watch Dr. Phillip Buckhaults South Carolina senate hearing to no avail. She and her husband just got their 7th. The only thing she focused on when watching Buckhaults was the part where he says he’d still give it to 65 yr olds and up.
If they are getting enough of it, vitamin D3 supposedly will largely or entirely take care of Covid all my itself. With each shot being weaker than the last, that's not a big accomplishment. I know nothing about D3's ability to handle the spike protein but other supplements do.
Your link was flagged as a violation.
Is he lying? Was he paid off?
BC is the province of brain dead insanity. Everyone has the right to an opinion but nobody has the right to impose their opinions on others. If anyone wants to take the experimental jab then it is their option but these stalinist droids have no right to impose their skanky death wish demands on others,
See you there if you can make it. Tickets purchased. I am excited.
I think Jessica should be Grand Marshall of the Calgary Stampede this year.
Official or the people's choice Grand Marshall
Both. And she should be Grand Marshall of the (Jessica) Rose Bowl parade too.
Wow. Powerful video!! Bless you - & all the other heroes - for your tireless work. (I know - you DO get tired!) Bless you & thank you.
I listen to TWiV so you don’t have to!
The lead guy is an old Columbia professor named Racaniello, and he has awarded himself the title of Earth’s Virology Professor. He was one of the guys in the e-mail chain with Fauci and others that has been revealed through FOIA, even though they went to great lengths to hide their correspondence and used burner phones. We’re four years into their bioweapon and he is one of the loudest voices still pushing the Racoon Dog/Pangolin idea.
In today’s podcast they speculate about how great self-amplifying spike-encoded Covid vaccine might be, because, well why not? When the conversation drifts into the topic of what could go wrong, they deftly segue away from such dangerous thoughts. Racaniello makes the comment that the mRNA vaccines have always remained in the upper arm at the injection site, even though some may think that don’t. Wow. We’re three years into this madness and there are hundreds of papers on biodistribution and accumulation throughout the body, including transfer of spike through mother’s breast milk to the infant. It’s as if these people live in a parallel universe!
At this point, another guy pipes up with, “That’s the kind of question the SAFETY WONKS will be paying attention to and wanting an answer to”. Wow. When you’re shilling for Big Pharma, you categorize the population who have a bit of skepticism as safety wonks.
TWiV is incredible, for all the wrong reasons!
Dear Jess please take a look at this latest utterance from Tedros at the WHO
on aggressive response to antivaxxers coming soon.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ivor-cummins-ab343a9a_what-are-some-of-the-most-evil-bigpharma-activity-7202767342362066944-cG6V
Hi
Covid-19 has never been able to give a visible increase in the overall number of yearly deaths. There is a very difficult proof, but there is also a very easy proof. The very easy one is the unincreased average number of chronic conditions in the group of official Covid-19 victims in the U.S. when compared to that of alive ones with exactly the same age structure:
" ...Even just the average number of chronic conditions protects the main result, which number must have been strongly increased among alive ones (but not already in a terminal state) and then really killed by the virus against the number in a comparative group of just alive ones with exactly the same age-structure (!), because Covid-19 out of infected ones at every specific age kills very few (of older ones) or extremely few (of younger ones) of them -usually weaker/weakest ones. The CDC knew there had to be a very clear correlation between 'Covid-19 Death Risk Ratio' and a number of conditions, but in the "Deaths involving Covid-19" (DIC) group none increase in the average number was visible (/officially only <3 conditions) even with limiting the list of conditions in the comparative group to the conservative CCW list (/comparison only of the prevalence of major hearth diseases shows it is unincreased in the DIC group -'Additional Notes -c'), what was possible if a share of real Covid-19 deaths in the DIC group was very small. If a person has a high number of CCW-conditions then what matters most to life expectancy is that pure number of conditions; the marginal decline in life expectancy increases with an additional chronic condition, when a number of conditions is low or moderate, but this decline starts with low values -first 2 conditions of 2008-CCW ones (and so approximately first 3 of actual CCW ones) sum up to about 3 times less negative effect on life expectancy than the next 2 conditions (3+4) of 2008-CCW do in 75-year old ones (= approximately 4+5+6 of actual CCW ones). /E.g. normally, still alive ones at age 67 and 75 with a low number (0 - 3) of actual CCW-conditions should otherwise live, on average, for the next approximately 22 and 16 years respectively, but with a very high number (14/15 - 30) of conditions they would otherwise live for the next approximately 5 and 4.5 years only./ "
"c) In the analysis it is assumed there still could be an increase in the average number of chronic conditions in the DIC group, even if the official number of conditions was decreased by >2 against the calculated CCW-norm of ⩾5 for alive ones with the same age-structure, due to some of heterogeneity in included in different observations conditions. As it was checked later (CDC.gov -Provisional Death Counts for COVID-19, Page 3 -Table 3) e.g. normally of a record high prevalence Hypertension was ignored on the 'Covid-19 death certificates' (only 'Hypertensive (hearth) disease' given instead), the same Demenia and Alzheimer (strongly underreported), there are not 'Chronic Kidney Diseases' but only 'Renal failure' instead; the summary prevalence of 'All other conditions' + Injuries -was 3 times smaller than of conditions which are additionally listed on the CCW list. On the other hand there was a 4-times bigger total prevalence of diseases of the respiratory system (especially due to 'Influenza and Pneumonia' and 'Respiratory failure' + 'Adult respiratory distress syndrome' -but mainly because the latest two are absent on the CCW list); to make the comparison a considerable part of this excess must be deducted, also because only conditions existing before the infection (so not secondary pneumonia) and those not being a result of falling into a terminal state can be counted (!). Obesity or Sepsis are not on the CCW list at all. ...Even just the total prevalence of major hearth diseases (excluding later added to the CCW list Hypertension, and so also 'Hypertensive disease', and not belonging there 'Cardial arrest') give precious information. These diseases are 'Number one' of causes of chronic disease death, so it is difficult to assume its important underreporting on the "Covid-19 death certificates" and simultaneously it is hard to assume that having another disease concerning one of the rest of different systems instead make someone, on average, apparently easier to get infected with Covid-19; thus this prevalence should be clearly increased if there were genuine Covid-19 deaths, but in the DIC group the official one is unincreased. /Before adjusting (early April 2021) by the CDC the average number to 4, the official number was under 3 conditions. However the number is still only <3, because we can calculate in the CDC table that the average number almost 4 is with added 'Covid-19' as a condition, so its no "4.0 additional conditions", but a bit short of 3./."
From: 'Extended abstract' and 'Additional Notes' of https://zenodo.org/records/8312871
FOUND THIS AND OTHER PRE-BUNKING ATTEMPTS:
https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/ucp-removes-covid-19-vaccine-child-death-references-takes-over-ticket-sales-to-controversial-event-1.6889915
In the small inserted video and main text:
It questions the credentials of various speakers, with denigrating but brief fragments about their 'baggage' - including Dr. Rose. She is dismissed as "an independent researcher" [although in the story lead-in, this was included: "Dr. Jessica Rose (who recently testified to the US Congress about the plasma DNA in the injections,]
Three of the 6 presenters' dismissals were: "not a medical doctor",
"a pediatrician who sued..... Alberta ", and "is a veterinarian"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BIO'S OF THESE 6 AND 3 OTHERS ARE PRESENTED IN THE PROMOTIONAL PAGE, They shed a MUCH MORE FLATTERING LIGHT on the presenters, some of whom have co-authored
papers with Dr. Rose.
https://aninjectionoftruth.ca/
Sponsored by United Conservative Party
Member/non-member online viewing is $21/$31 respectively,
presumably Canadian dollars
https://www.unitedconservative.ca/june17-streaming/
There does not appear to be any free online viewing. ☹
Our favorite "Researcher" might be the
heaviest hitter in this lineup! 😃
ANOTHER 'PRE-BUNKER':
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/alberta-premier-s-support-for-town-hall-questioning-covid-vaccines-worries-experts/ar-BB1mGhTL
I don't know how many there are, this is just a heads-up.
So happy that you are one of the excellent speakers coming for this event! Thank you!!
Awesome, excited to view what will come from this...for an appetizer, try the latest McCullough state-of-the-info talk: https://pomocon.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-on-the-state
I’m so bummed I’m unable to attend. Truth tellers unite!
Wish I could be there to see/meet you all in person. Bring it home Dr. Jessica - we know you will. Hugs.
Really powerful and heart breaking
The best injection I've heard about in the last four years...
ignore them
ignore the fear porn
Ever the relaxed woman of excellence, intelligence and candor backed by a focus grounded in the reality of fact, truth and substance of character. It was Isaac Isamov decades ago who penned an article "Praise Excellence" whereby he urged others to do just that. I have tended to do that, but on the other end of the scale have condemned errancy, lies and evil. Today evil, darkness and death clothe themselves in the self righteous maggotry of ignorance, seeking to influence others to forsake Truth and take the yellow brick road of destruction. Leaders so called are liars of loony and archaic assininity, clad in the rags of ignorance, deception and damnation.
Innocent men, women and children are their victims but their silent repose in death bears witness to who truly is right, and who truly is wrong. Murder in any way is condemned, a sin unto death, be it by needle/fake jab or at the hand of a terrorist using a gun, a knife or a suicide vest.
Once again I praise and am awed by brave women in the midst of the battle for life wherever or whatever means they use to defend Truth. Can I do less? But the question is can I do more? Jessica the "Rose" is a symbol of much needed Truth in this age of lies and liars, pushing a death wish on others from the young to to old. who are innocent but willing victims of the enemy that is anything but good.
It is in the wee small hours of the morning again I awaken and feel immense gratitude towards those in the battle who have offered themselves as willing defenders of Truth and Justice. I cherish each and every one of them whoever and whatever and wherever they be.
Agree but then think well, we’ve ignored the crazies to our detriment the past six decades and look where we are now. When a liberal tells you who they are and what they plan to do believe them. Time to fight!!!
We are the mouse fighting the elephant.
The best we can do is to hope to infect him with hantavirus.
The truth is like a virus, it eventually spreads, and silence is like remdesivir, useless and deadly.
I can't get to Calgary next month but will send the notice to our daughter there.
R