32 Comments

It's 1:10 AM here. I'm going to bed now. Hope I can sleep after reading this.

I could've left my inbox alone till morning, but noooooo....

Not your fault. It should be my next night sleep that it gets hampered!

All-in-all thanks for the heads up. I don't like the feeling but - Hope we all l

live long enough to see Fauci hung.

Expand full comment
founding
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Well done, Jessica. Great find. Horrible implications.

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022·edited Aug 25, 2022

I have advocated against including the spike's N-Terminal Domain in the vaccine, because it causes Antibody Dependent Enhancement. (antibodies attaching to NTD flip the virus over, enhancing its ability to attach to ACE2 in host cells.) The first version of BioNTech's vaccine rightfully excluded the NTD, whereas the second version included the entire spike.

The CEO of BioNTech, Ugur Sahin, a brilliant immunologist in his own right, chose to pursue V2 instead of V1 for, I believe, marketing reasons: V1 had slightly more (totally inconsequential) side-effects, and that was the reason he cited for pursuing V2. However, given his background as an immunologist, one would assume that he was well versed in theories of Rational Vaccine Design. Therefore, use of the entire spike (which even then was well known to be highly pathogenic) is reprehensible. Even criminal.

Jessica is a scientist, and is doing a superb job of educating her followers about the "injectable products". My main interest is different. I'm advocating punishing and eliminating from the face of the earth all (I repeat, "all") the China-Virus-Fascists who:

-- Shut down our economy and society.

-- Prevented visitation to people seriously ill in hospitals, thereby violating Protocol F of the ABCDEF Bundle of protocols that are supposed to guide ICU daily procedures in treating patients. This violation undoubtedly led to hundreds of thousands of deaths among patients, regardless of disease. (Failure to implement just ONE of the six protocols, on just one day of an ICU stay, increases the probability of death within the next 14 days by over 20%.)

-- Mandated that we "mask up", thereby actually spreading the virus, as well as harming the mask wearers. Children were especially harmed.

-- Mandated that we be vaccinated, or lose our jobs, etc. (I'll leave that issue to Jessica, who does such a marvelous job in educating people about the consequences of the injectable products (as well as the actual vaccines using the entire spike.)

-- Mandated quarantines, contact tracing, and other nonsense when the cat was already out of the Wuhan bag.

-- Actively and criminally PREVENTED use of over a hundred proven-safe and probably effective repurposed drugs for treating China-virus patients.

-- Censored the knowledgeable, intelligent people (including scientists) who argued against the scum and their propaganda.

Why would I advocate eliminating them ALL from the face of the Earth? Because they refuse to surrender. A prime example is Rochelle Wallensky (whose "scientific" work at Mass General consisted largely of dangerous nonsense -- read her published material and decide for yourself about her work.) Wallensky, a few days ago, said that CDC and the country didn't GO FAR ENOUGH with their lockdowns, masking, etc. "Next time..."

No, they refuse to surrender. Therefore, we need to fight back and eliminate them.

Their crimes make Josef Mengele look like a boy scout in comparison.

Jessica, I hope you'll "like" my comment!

Expand full comment

In the past I have imagined the possibility that the actual eugenics plan was not to murder directly 85% of Humanity, but to create the circumstances so that the Governments "must" kill the population. For example, being a failrue in a Genetic Modification experiment that creates an existential risk.

Very twisted.

This information adds weight to that hypothesis.

Expand full comment
founding
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Just when you think things can’t get any worse… Big Sigh….. I tell you, the “ignorance is bliss” phrase is sounding pretty good right now.

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

This is a bad outcome under any circumstance. Maybe I'm misunderstanding but it seems the spike was injected intraperitoneal in the fish. Wouldn't it have been better just to have separate tanks to see if the spike protein had similar effects if entering via GI or respiratory tracts? It seems like comparison of natural infection to injection wouldn't be the best way to determine the outcome in the water ecosystem. It still is pretty bad that fish are obviously in trouble after the spike. Because my biochemistry, genetics and brain are very old my other question would be comparison of the spike that their experiment produced to the spike from the vaccine?

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Scary stuff! What happens if we passionately kiss someone jabbed and boosted?

Wise men say only fools rush in, but where would love be without fools like me?

Expand full comment

Certainly helps explain the benefits of Pfizer cabal skipping the animal trials before skipping steps in the human clinical trials.. key to success never ask a question when you don't want the answer.

The don't look-don't find policy is the foundation of chemical "regulation" and based on assuming safety in the absence of evidence. Industry response is "We see no harm."

Basic Testing to Identify Chemical Hazards

If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing

Expand full comment

I think in the end no part of creation will be exempt from these nefarious machinations. thanks for the heads up, love your work and your playing with words. makes a bad subject easier to read with a laugh or two combined. this makes me very glad to be living on a small tropical island at the southern edge of the world. We do have great surfing, and great snorkeling and scuba diving here. Many of the wonders of creation to enjoy.

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Is there a flipside? Will we find some animal that clears spike and repairs damage? I know so many jabbed and I pray for them every day.

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022·edited Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

"the spike from the original Wuhoo strain "

Ha, ha :-)...

Easter eggs :-)?

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Surprise, surprise, the lab created S1 synthetic chimeric spike protein (bio-weapon) is toxic to fish also. Keep exposing the bad science. :D

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Please pardon my ignorance, but these fish were injected with the stuff.

How do we know that similar effects will occur with ambient Spike?

Expand full comment

Jessica always so much information thank you. Next thing they are going to say sorry (not really) you can't fish anymore. So now I am curious is the spike somehow getting into food that we eat? If we eat fresh fish does this mean that even if we haven't been jabbed that we still have to worry because somehow the spike is making it into the water and into the food we eat?

Expand full comment

Oh god, more stuff for us to notice. Thanks though; it's very important info. Just one question: if the virus has never been isolated, how do we truly understand it?

Expand full comment

Off topic:

Jessica, I just found this on Dave Cartland's page:

https://theredpillrevolution.com/perhaps-the-most-significant-interview-in-science-ever/

Dr. Lee Merritt, whom I trust, interviews Dr. Poornima Wagh who says there is no mRNA in 2000 jab vials tested.

What's up?

Expand full comment