But OF COURSE Jessica Rose is making a BAD analysis of VAERS, since her results are not the pre-approved ones (i.e. the scientific opinion-fact that the "vaccineseses" are "sugar, spice and everything nice").
We love you, Dr. Unacceptica. If only we could ignore "Ad hominem attacks from people without the facts." Sadly, these people have power over the targets of such attacks and the minds of those who listen to them. Critical thinkers ignore them as well they should.
I look forward to watching a Zoom boxing match between you and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss -- or, perhaps challenge Dorit to a surfing contest. Either way, you win! 🥊👊🏄♀️
By the way, my sister is a lawyer and one of the worst leftists I know. She "helped out" at a few mass vaccination clinics (so she could get her shots ahead of the rest of her age cohort) and chastised a fellow lawyer who tried to offer what little Informed Consent was available at the time.
Aug 16, 2022·edited Aug 21, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
Jessica - Dorit probably works for Pfizer. There are thousands of them, hired to sow confusion on the web, to make ad hominem attacks, to distract the public so they won't notice the obvious and draw appropriate conclusions.
Wow, just wow! She can’t recover from that awesome takedown. Love your spirit and am blown away by your mind. We defend our position so passionately because we’re right. Some by instinct and common sense, others with all of that plus brilliance. Thank God we have you Jessica. Always grateful and with unwavering support. ❤️
congratulations, you are obviously making an impact, so they attack. Quite the honor. We are living in the upside down world, where lies and liars are venerated and truth tellers are vilified. While looking at VAERS you found the obvious and reported it. therefore I, with the power vested in me, bestow upon you the much coveted and rare certification of Master Of The Obvious. you may now add MOTO to any list of credentials that you wish to display behind your name.
How to be respecting of opposition without being a wimp. Good job JR for drawing fire from complacent academics in high places. Nobody with an original thought slips through their radar without a good strafing.
You’ll likely never hear from this disingenuous windbag, little Dorit. Dr. Jessica, you always rise above anything that is thrown at you. You are forever young in heart and spirit.
Aug 16, 2022·edited Aug 16, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
Greetings,
I upgraded so I could comment. It seems one aspect, if not the main thrust, of Dorit's career is mercenary vaccine legal advocacy. She seems to have been engaged in the childhood vaccination schedule v autism battle. All that being said, that means there are likely some some strange bedfellows that will crop up via the wonders of the internet ie funding by Pfizer, or cocktail event photos with n'er do wells such as Gates or Fauci or Colins etc.
"And this is also the problem of Reiss: reality can be stage-managed in the mainstream media but the evidence of hundreds and thousands of wrecked lives are harder to suppress in the social media: there is no one – apart from usual medical spokespeople spouting the conventional wisdom – who can be more authoritative. There are no underlying scientific principles, only a morass of flawed, limited studies and a host of bureaucratic decisions masking the legal reality that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” . Despite her grand debut as a vaccine advocate in Harvard Law Review (standing in for Art Caplan) barely six months ago Reiss has ended up scrambling from one blog to another trying to block out the ever peeping reality that these products cause unaccountable injury and death. Caplan, confronted by Mary Holland disappeared – if Caplan played a false move while in open debate it could have serious consequences, but Reiss is expendable (though also apparently, in retrospect, inexhaustible). If she has a somewhat uncertain professional status as a lawyer, as has been suggested, this may be part of the story too.
As it is her defence of vaccines often rests on the rants of David Gorski or the blog of Liz Ditz, and if she tends to play her hand courteously (at least superficially) she is surrounded by a ragbag of supporters and associates who do anything but. This week found her in trouble defending flu mandates for young children in New York on the comment page of the John Gambling Show and resorting to anonymous Facebook page “notes/chillin-out-vaxin-relaxin-all-cool/flu-shots-for-kids-two-year-yes they are effective”.
I’m on your team, Jessica! Thanks for your analysis and outrage! I’m irritated that I still need to get a Covid test to enter a California hospital for non-emergency, non-minor escorted visits bc I’m not covid-19 injected. I asked El Camino Hospital if they had changed their policies with the new CDC guidance and the head of legal affairs had someone email me NO!
This is considered a high honor to be attacked by these trolls because it means you now considered an actual threat. She won't debate you - none of them will. But I have to point out: Why give her a platform? You have *far* more impact than she. Most veterans will tell you: these pointy-headed know-nothings only do what they do to distort reality and are not worth your time. ORACs blog articles are rich source of examples of logical fallacies (overgeneralizations, conclusions from assumptions, exercises in abductive logic, non-sequitur, positivism, confirmation bias, outright lies & distortions), always slathered in rich layers of ad-hominem). They are unprofessional; You are far, far beyond them.
Ah, Dorit. She and I have had many tête-a-têtes over the years. They didn't last long, though. She'd quickly begin quoting risk/benefit ratios of the childhood vaccines, and I'd tell her that it wasn't probability of injury that mattered, but possibility; that no thinking parent would consent to a shot that, unpredictably, could severely injure or kill her child. The conversations typically ended there.
Several days after the successful completion of a court case, my father was approached by the presiding judge who casually mentioned that his closing argument could easily have been four concise words, “He is a bastard.” The judge went on to acknowledge that such a summary would not have been nearly as effective as the summary’s polite review of the salient facts that dammed this man as a bastard, nor as memorable. Perhaps you should add diplomacy to your list of accomplishments because your clear indictment of Dorit Rubenstein Reiss’s character is priceless and diplomatic. It is also instructive and should reach a wider audience!
Congratulations on yet more evidence that you are a threat to the Establishment, Jessica, and thus merit such a pitiful and shoddy takedown attempt.
“Doesn’t an attack on another’s character require that one KNOW the character? How else can an attack on character be founded?”
Ah, but Jessica, name-calling and Kafkatrapping are Propaganda 101 strategies and are almost always baseless:
• https://propagandacritic.com/index.php/how-to-decode-propaganda/name-calling/
• https://lifelessons.co/critical-thinking/kafkatrapping/
Defamation *is* litigatable—I’d love to see that play out if you’re up for the challenge :-)
Meanwhile, I’m eager for the Zoom debate 🍿
But OF COURSE Jessica Rose is making a BAD analysis of VAERS, since her results are not the pre-approved ones (i.e. the scientific opinion-fact that the "vaccineseses" are "sugar, spice and everything nice").
We love you, Dr. Unacceptica. If only we could ignore "Ad hominem attacks from people without the facts." Sadly, these people have power over the targets of such attacks and the minds of those who listen to them. Critical thinkers ignore them as well they should.
I look forward to watching a Zoom boxing match between you and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss -- or, perhaps challenge Dorit to a surfing contest. Either way, you win! 🥊👊🏄♀️
By the way, my sister is a lawyer and one of the worst leftists I know. She "helped out" at a few mass vaccination clinics (so she could get her shots ahead of the rest of her age cohort) and chastised a fellow lawyer who tried to offer what little Informed Consent was available at the time.
Jessica - Dorit probably works for Pfizer. There are thousands of them, hired to sow confusion on the web, to make ad hominem attacks, to distract the public so they won't notice the obvious and draw appropriate conclusions.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/un-recruited-over-100000-digital-first-responders-push-establishment-covid-narrative
- Josh
Wow, just wow! She can’t recover from that awesome takedown. Love your spirit and am blown away by your mind. We defend our position so passionately because we’re right. Some by instinct and common sense, others with all of that plus brilliance. Thank God we have you Jessica. Always grateful and with unwavering support. ❤️
You are one of my heroes (ok, heroines!). Maintain the high ground, always.
congratulations, you are obviously making an impact, so they attack. Quite the honor. We are living in the upside down world, where lies and liars are venerated and truth tellers are vilified. While looking at VAERS you found the obvious and reported it. therefore I, with the power vested in me, bestow upon you the much coveted and rare certification of Master Of The Obvious. you may now add MOTO to any list of credentials that you wish to display behind your name.
How to be respecting of opposition without being a wimp. Good job JR for drawing fire from complacent academics in high places. Nobody with an original thought slips through their radar without a good strafing.
You’ll likely never hear from this disingenuous windbag, little Dorit. Dr. Jessica, you always rise above anything that is thrown at you. You are forever young in heart and spirit.
If there is no one attacking us we probably aren’t saying anything of much import. Celebrate the attackers. They know they are losing.
These people are below you.
Greetings,
I upgraded so I could comment. It seems one aspect, if not the main thrust, of Dorit's career is mercenary vaccine legal advocacy. She seems to have been engaged in the childhood vaccination schedule v autism battle. All that being said, that means there are likely some some strange bedfellows that will crop up via the wonders of the internet ie funding by Pfizer, or cocktail event photos with n'er do wells such as Gates or Fauci or Colins etc.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2013/12/dorit-rubinstein-reiss-and-the-weakness-of-vaccine-science.html
"And this is also the problem of Reiss: reality can be stage-managed in the mainstream media but the evidence of hundreds and thousands of wrecked lives are harder to suppress in the social media: there is no one – apart from usual medical spokespeople spouting the conventional wisdom – who can be more authoritative. There are no underlying scientific principles, only a morass of flawed, limited studies and a host of bureaucratic decisions masking the legal reality that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” . Despite her grand debut as a vaccine advocate in Harvard Law Review (standing in for Art Caplan) barely six months ago Reiss has ended up scrambling from one blog to another trying to block out the ever peeping reality that these products cause unaccountable injury and death. Caplan, confronted by Mary Holland disappeared – if Caplan played a false move while in open debate it could have serious consequences, but Reiss is expendable (though also apparently, in retrospect, inexhaustible). If she has a somewhat uncertain professional status as a lawyer, as has been suggested, this may be part of the story too.
As it is her defence of vaccines often rests on the rants of David Gorski or the blog of Liz Ditz, and if she tends to play her hand courteously (at least superficially) she is surrounded by a ragbag of supporters and associates who do anything but. This week found her in trouble defending flu mandates for young children in New York on the comment page of the John Gambling Show and resorting to anonymous Facebook page “notes/chillin-out-vaxin-relaxin-all-cool/flu-shots-for-kids-two-year-yes they are effective”.
I’m on your team, Jessica! Thanks for your analysis and outrage! I’m irritated that I still need to get a Covid test to enter a California hospital for non-emergency, non-minor escorted visits bc I’m not covid-19 injected. I asked El Camino Hospital if they had changed their policies with the new CDC guidance and the head of legal affairs had someone email me NO!
This is considered a high honor to be attacked by these trolls because it means you now considered an actual threat. She won't debate you - none of them will. But I have to point out: Why give her a platform? You have *far* more impact than she. Most veterans will tell you: these pointy-headed know-nothings only do what they do to distort reality and are not worth your time. ORACs blog articles are rich source of examples of logical fallacies (overgeneralizations, conclusions from assumptions, exercises in abductive logic, non-sequitur, positivism, confirmation bias, outright lies & distortions), always slathered in rich layers of ad-hominem). They are unprofessional; You are far, far beyond them.
Ah, Dorit. She and I have had many tête-a-têtes over the years. They didn't last long, though. She'd quickly begin quoting risk/benefit ratios of the childhood vaccines, and I'd tell her that it wasn't probability of injury that mattered, but possibility; that no thinking parent would consent to a shot that, unpredictably, could severely injure or kill her child. The conversations typically ended there.
Several days after the successful completion of a court case, my father was approached by the presiding judge who casually mentioned that his closing argument could easily have been four concise words, “He is a bastard.” The judge went on to acknowledge that such a summary would not have been nearly as effective as the summary’s polite review of the salient facts that dammed this man as a bastard, nor as memorable. Perhaps you should add diplomacy to your list of accomplishments because your clear indictment of Dorit Rubenstein Reiss’s character is priceless and diplomatic. It is also instructive and should reach a wider audience!