31% of women who were exposed to COVID-19 products prior to pregnancy experienced a miscarriage according to VAERS domestic data

This is almost twice the upper limit background rate as per the CDC's v-safe calculations

Update: Quote from an ob/gyn - “Just read your latest substack. Naert et al in 2020 showed the actual miscarriage rate in the first trimester is closer to 5-6 %. In 30 years that is even higher than what I have seen. The 13-15% they have always quoted as normal is elevated probably because of all of the shots they have us give our patients. Just an FYI. So 30% is a disaster. That was my miscarriage rate in 12/2022. It did not come down to normal until June of this year. What is scary is the majority of my patients had injections in 2021 and early 2022 and yet the losses continue. Probably due to plasmids with continual production of spike.”

This is a follow-up to my article from earlier today, November 12, 2023. In my quest to discover the wisdom now removed from the CDC website pertaining to advice on injecting pregnant ‘people’, I discovered that 32% of women who reported having been exposed to the COVID-19 injections prior to their pregnancy, had a miscarriage. This percentage was calculated based on both the domestic and foreign data sets.

I hope this is a fake photo. Smoking is probably a bad idea when pregnant. Just like getting injected with experimental products is also probably a bad idea. Source: https://www.genengnews.com/topics/omics/epigenetic-study-reveals-prenatal-exposure-of-children-to-smoking/

The background rate for miscarriages, as calculated by the CDC (v-safe data), is between 11% and 16%. You can read about that here.

Miscarriage typically occurs in about 11-16% of pregnancies, and this study found miscarriage rates after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine were around 13%, similar to the expected rate of miscarriage in the general population.¹²

The 32% rate applies to the cohort of women in VAERS (domestic and foreign data) who reported having both 1. been exposed to the COVID-19 injectable products just prior to pregnancy, and 2. suffered a miscarriage. For those of you who might say that this rate is not comparable to the background miscarriage rate as calculated by the CDC, I decided to do an equivalent comparison using VAERS data for influenza shots. Here’s what I found.

First let’s look at exposure during pregnancy. N.B. The following analysis is for the domestic data and includes all COVID-19 shots including Moderna, Pfizer, Janssen and Novavax.

Exposure during pregnancy

During the years 2018-2020, 34,218 people reported an adverse event in the context of the influenza vaccines. Of these, 61.9% of the reports were made by women. 453 women reported having been exposed to the influenza shots during their pregnancies and of these women, 40 reported experiencing a miscarriage. Thus, the percentage of women exposed to influenza products during their pregnancy who also experienced and reported a miscarriage to VAERS is 8.8%. This is 2.2% points lower than the lower limit for the background rate as calculated by the CDC.

During the years 2021-2023, 976,270 people reported an adverse event in the context of the COVID-19 shots. Of these, 63.7% were made by women. 5,140 women reported having been exposed to the COVID-19 shots during their pregnancies and of these women, 876 reported experiencing a miscarriage. Thus, the percentage of women exposed to COVID-19 products during their pregnancy who also experienced and reported a miscarriage to VAERS is 17%. This is 1% point higher than the upper limit for the background rate.

The rates of miscarriage in the context of women exposed to influenza vaccines versus COVID-19 shots differ by 8.2%. The rate is almost double in the context of the COVID-19 shots.

Now let’s compare in the same way, but in women who reported having been exposed prior to pregnancy.

Exposure prior to pregnancy

During the years 2018-2020, 4 women reported having been exposed to the influenza shots prior to their pregnancies and of these women, 1 reported experiencing a miscarriage.

Patient was vaccinated about 3 days before conceiving, patient's mother reported a miscarriage to pharmacy that occurred about 6 weeks after receiving vaccine. VAERS_ID: 733595

So this means that the percentage of women exposed to influenza products prior to their shot, who also experienced and reported a miscarriage to VAERS is 25%. It is important to keep in mind that only 4 women reported having been exposed prior, so the 25% - although correct - is kind of different to a 25% that would represent 1000/4000 for example, because we would be looking at 4000 women having reported exposure instead of 4. Just saying. This is a 9% points higher than the upper limit for the background rate.

During the years 2021-2023, 347 women reported having been exposed to the COVID-19 shots prior to their pregnancies and of these women, 108 reported experiencing a miscarriage. This means that the percentage of women exposed to COVID-19 products prior to their shot, who also experienced and reported a miscarriage to VAERS is 31%. This is 15% points higher than the upper limit for the background rate.

I was pregnant shortly after getting the vaccine and I lost the baby due to a blood clot at 16 weeks. I was told it could be from the shot. Little worried because I am pregnant again. VAERS_ID: 2393261

The rates of miscarriage in the context of women exposed (prior to pregnancy) to influenza vaccines versus COVID-19 shots differ by 6%. The rate is higher in the context of the COVID-19 shots.

Questions:

1. Why is the rate of miscarriage in women exposed to COVID-19 products during pregnancy 8.2% points higher than the rate for influenza products in a comparable 3 year time frame?

2. Why is the rate of miscarriage in women exposed to COVID-19 products prior to pregnancy 6% points higher than the rate for influenza products in a comparable 3 year time frame?

3. Why are the rates for the COVID-19 shots, in both the during and prior to exposure contexts, higher than the miscarriage background rate calculated by the CDC by 1% and 15% points, respectively?

Waiting for answers.

1. https://web.archive.org/web/20230701091557/https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-798175/v1

2. Head Zauche L, Wallace B, Smoots AN, Olson CK, Oduyebo T, Kim SY, Peterson EE, Ju J, Beauregard J, Wilcox AJ, Rose CE, Meaney-Delman D, Ellington SR. Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines preconception and during pregnancy and risk of self-reported spontaneous abortions, CDC v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry 2020-21. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2021 Aug 9:rs.3.rs-798175. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-798175/v1. PMID: 34401872; PMCID: PMC8366802