This is exactly what we should expect from Pfizer, a serial criminal fraud company that has paid billions in fines for its crimes. If they want to take 75 years to release their data then we should wait 75 years to take the toxic jabs.
Jessica, I feel inadequate just posting thanks here. But that is where I am in life. What you are doing is not only important -- it is vital. All of us are in your debt. Many thanks. Hope you have the psychic strength to keep going...we are all sending "support thought waves" to you.
Jessica, I’m sure you’re aware of what Naomi Wolf is finding. Her most recent findings are that Pfizer & FDA knew that the experimental mRNA’s were neither safe nor effective but FDA issued EUA in spite of data. Am guessing the fda cabal was paid handsomely to release evil upon humanity.
The judge demanded Pfizer release the documents over a much shorter period of time.
So the Pfizer lawyers and obfuscators likely went to work shuffling the data deck and tossing it up in the air, so as to minimize anyone's ability to make sense of it before they scram outta there to even cushier jobs higher up in some pharm or reg agency hierarchy. Those missing subjects may have been deep sixed, or they may have been randomly distributed to later data dumps, so as to delay any significant findings of their already-obvious malfeasance. They don't get their preferred 75 years, but they're doing their best to stonewall and not to cooperate.
This is the "transparency" you'd expect from a criminal organization.
I'm not sure how your keeping your sanity through all of this but we appreciate all that you are doing to dig to the bottom of this stinky, rotten, pile of serious doo doo! Thank you JR.
Unacceptable Jessica, you are so far beyond my meager powers of organization and analysis, it's really quite humbling. At the same time, I'm not entirely stupid. Like a blind man with a cane, I've learned to rely on different methods to get to where I need to go. And so I remind myself the half dozen high IQ math whizzes in my family....all Liberal Democrats... and with enough advanced degrees between them to sink that Titanic of yours..cannot seem to figure out how the world works. And surely, that's problem A1A as we learn to navigate life. And they have no apparent ability to discern the good people from the bad, which is likely even more important. .One of them, my sister-ln-law, for example, when explaining the main reasons she loves Hillary Clinton (gag), recollects that her old Professor friend, who happened to have Hillary in his undergraduate class, called her the smartest student he's ever had. Well for crying' out loud. Hitler must have had an unusually high IQ, and look at the trouble he caused!
All of the above by way of saying in my not very articulate way. I love your writing. And most important, I love the work you do. It's a pleasure to see an extraordinarily high IQ person using that intellect for good in the world. It's certainly doesn't seem to be the rule. Wisdom and IQ don't really seem to correlated in any significant way. Someone ought to study that! (Or perhaps someone has. I suppose the trouble would be defining wisdom in some useful way)
Let's hope than if Pfizer's fraud in this data can be proven, it will lose its freedom from liability from these jabs and will be bankrupted by the ensuing lawsuits. I hope Jessica gets a cut of these damages and fines.
Dr Rose, are you and your group of data heroes speaking with Dr Naomi R Wolf and the WarRoom team? She has assembled a group of 2500 capable volunteers plus 250 lawyers who are sifting through these data dumps.
Perhaps there are synergies there to help expedite this data review?
I wish I could help; I simply do not have the skill set.
This and earlier posts are extraordinarily valuable, and courageous, in trying to restore integrity to the allopathic approach to health care (which addresses disease via drugs and vaccines). But allopathic medicine is not enough.
For superior resistance to falling ill in the first place, and for greater health, crucially needed is an extensive review of nutritional and other ways to strengthen the first two stages of the immune system (aka “innate”).
Stage one includes neutrophils, macrophages, and the like. They begin to go to work almost within minutes of the body’s detection of infection. Natural killer cells come in, as stage two, about three days after infection. Only after a week or two do antibodies, stage three, begin to form and work. When made healthy and strong by proper nutrition—the “complementary” approach, adding what is missing, completing the body’s needs—the first two stages can often preclude the need for drugs and vaccines.
Even when nutritional recommendations are made in the allopathic approach, they often lack something important. For example, although recommendations for vitamin D have become more common, usually lacking are recommendations also for adequate vitamin K2, magnesium, and vitamin A, all of which the body needs to make vitamin D work well. Further, they are treated as if they were allopathic drugs, such as employing black cumin seed (nigella sativa) only because compounds in it interfere with actions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33746069/ And doses of such things as vitamin C are usually way too low for many uses. (Good for World Council for Health for giving one of Linus Pauling’s protocols. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/vitamin-c-for-covid/ He later went to 12 grams in divided doses daily, bowel tolerance limited, to prevent infection in the first place.)
You can find “A fuller view of natural anti-infectives” in the health subsection of my new substack The Menelaus Gambit (Seeing Beneath the Illusions). https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/a-fuller-picture-of-natural-anti?s=w I have spent 50 years reading widely and using various techniques, first to ward off colds and flu, and then to ameliorate crippling and life-threatening consequences of the 1976 Swine Flu shot. The relevance is staggering.
I agree with you, but as long as there is money to be made off people's illnesses, natural preventions will be hidden. That's why we need people like you and a parallel medical system of independent doctors free of corporations, insurers and other influences.
It seemed to me as an outsider that a/the previous data dump listing over 1200 adverse reactions to the jab was quite a revelation. Does this one amount to anything, other than revealing trial fraud and obfuscation? I’ll be anxiously awaiting further analysis.
I think those were 1200 real reactions that were documented, and ignored. But what we need to be careful of, and Jessica can confirm this, is that the nine pages of adverse reactions we keep reading about was a laundry list of what reactions to look for, not necessarily reactions that happened.
Case report forms (CRFs) are not required to be submitted to an application for all study subjects; CRFs are only required for subjects who experience a serious adverse event, death, an adverse event that is predefined in the study protocol as being of interest, and withdrawal due to an adverse event. So, it would be completely normal to only see a subset of subjects have a CRF submitted to an application. In this case, where they're trying very hard to cover up any serious adverse events, I wouldn't be surprised to see less than 10% of the subjects represented. At some point in this data dump there will be patient-level data listings that include every data item reported, and once those listings are available, one can determine if all of the case report forms have been released or not.
Go easy on the poor Titanic now as it was built 40 miles form where I grew up and it was in perfect condition when the shipyard handed over the key fob to the new owner.... but I digress! Yes, true to form Pfizer is playing the elusive card, and what is sad is that's all under the 'watchful' eye of the so called "authorities" (FDA etc). I mean this is a gigantic crime being committed right before our eyes, and like Hunter and his escapades, there appears to be no recourse. The ugliness of the Big Pharma / Media / Government Crime Syndicate is there for all to see in big bright capital letters. Keep doing what yer doing there Unacceptable Jessica!!!
It was obvious from the beginning that there was an intentional disorderly/disorganized release of the Pfizer documents in order to purposely confound the analysis by the experts combing through the information/data. The court should have ordered a specific release methodology.
My guess is that the sociopaths in charge are threading a needle.
Years ago, I worked next door to a Pfizer research lab. At lunch people in that building would occasionally chat; I asked a clutch of bespectacled lab rats who they worked for, they said Pfizer. Having done my masters in Med Micro and curious, I asked "how do you like it?"
There was some nervous, bitter laughter and one woman said "They just paid out another multi-million dollar fine..." I don't remember the rest of the conversation, but it seemed they had expected they'd be saving lives and, instead, they were rationalizing their salary on a daily basis. Not a happy group. That was years ago and maybe those folks with a conscience winnowed themselves out, but I think the risk of a disgusted whistleblower forces the sociopaths in charge to find ways to "comply" without complying, so as to maintain the delicate balance.
Out of college, I interviewed with Pharm companies, innocent of all this, but, even back then, something smelled off -- they just didn't seem to actually care about the people taking their pills -- and I went another direction.
They could still be sanctioned by the presiding judge for contempt, for failure to act in good faith, but they're experts in pushing right up to the red line and not crossing it. We'll see.
Fortunately, we have people like Jessica who can see through the bs and mine damning data from what scraps they provide.
Aren't you glad you went in another direction? I totally agree with your assessment of Big Pharma and that the sociopaths in charge are indeed threading a needle.
Did you see Pfizer's recent letter to investors? Despite a 1Q22 $7.8B profit (61% increase), their forward-looking statement is somewhat measured, and includes this risk: "unforeseen safety issues and claims for personal injury or death arising from the use of our COVID-19 vaccine and other products and product candidates developed or manufactured by us". Why would they say that given their generous liability protections?
medical products of all kinds fall into the same 'profits before patients' mind set. a good friend's daughter was making insane $$, selling, consulting & installing pace makers. she quit after a few years, sickened by the push to sell, sell, sell. they were literally taught to stretch the criteria for someone 'needing' a pace maker, which was then billed to insurance at a 4000 % mark-up on cost of manufacture. ugh
Wow. Once they've installed a pacemaker, that individual is a money-maker for the rest of her/his life, with all the restrictions and reduction in quality of life it implies. Stents, same deal, except all hard evidence is that they provide no long-term benefit... and yet they go on....
Jessica: Do you know about Abstractor? It is a tool that looks at the Pfizer pdf documents from the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) organisation in the US and searches for keywords. Results are displayed by document and page number with links to the documents matching the keyword(s). Here ia an article about it:
This is the one real tool and set of organized information that has worked for me to get through to people that something isn't right. I actually watched the color on a Ph.D. trained friend's face drain when I gave her this tool, when nothing else seemed to sink in. Batch number correlates well at the person level in my experience when I can tell someone which shot gave them more side effects.
I see posts on Twitter discounting the batch variation as mere variation in mRNA dosage as if that is acceptable.
This is exactly what we should expect from Pfizer, a serial criminal fraud company that has paid billions in fines for its crimes. If they want to take 75 years to release their data then we should wait 75 years to take the toxic jabs.
Would love to see the complete Pfizer Crimes-Fines spreadsheet.
Unacceptable Jessica is Unstoppable. Keep plugging away.
Jessica, I feel inadequate just posting thanks here. But that is where I am in life. What you are doing is not only important -- it is vital. All of us are in your debt. Many thanks. Hope you have the psychic strength to keep going...we are all sending "support thought waves" to you.
Jessica, I’m sure you’re aware of what Naomi Wolf is finding. Her most recent findings are that Pfizer & FDA knew that the experimental mRNA’s were neither safe nor effective but FDA issued EUA in spite of data. Am guessing the fda cabal was paid handsomely to release evil upon humanity.
Yes we got in touch today. :)
This made my day. If there’s anything I can do to help $$ with your research…please let me know.
Very cool!
The judge demanded Pfizer release the documents over a much shorter period of time.
So the Pfizer lawyers and obfuscators likely went to work shuffling the data deck and tossing it up in the air, so as to minimize anyone's ability to make sense of it before they scram outta there to even cushier jobs higher up in some pharm or reg agency hierarchy. Those missing subjects may have been deep sixed, or they may have been randomly distributed to later data dumps, so as to delay any significant findings of their already-obvious malfeasance. They don't get their preferred 75 years, but they're doing their best to stonewall and not to cooperate.
This is the "transparency" you'd expect from a criminal organization.
You and I are thinking the same thing...
I'm not sure how your keeping your sanity through all of this but we appreciate all that you are doing to dig to the bottom of this stinky, rotten, pile of serious doo doo! Thank you JR.
Unacceptable Jessica, you are so far beyond my meager powers of organization and analysis, it's really quite humbling. At the same time, I'm not entirely stupid. Like a blind man with a cane, I've learned to rely on different methods to get to where I need to go. And so I remind myself the half dozen high IQ math whizzes in my family....all Liberal Democrats... and with enough advanced degrees between them to sink that Titanic of yours..cannot seem to figure out how the world works. And surely, that's problem A1A as we learn to navigate life. And they have no apparent ability to discern the good people from the bad, which is likely even more important. .One of them, my sister-ln-law, for example, when explaining the main reasons she loves Hillary Clinton (gag), recollects that her old Professor friend, who happened to have Hillary in his undergraduate class, called her the smartest student he's ever had. Well for crying' out loud. Hitler must have had an unusually high IQ, and look at the trouble he caused!
All of the above by way of saying in my not very articulate way. I love your writing. And most important, I love the work you do. It's a pleasure to see an extraordinarily high IQ person using that intellect for good in the world. It's certainly doesn't seem to be the rule. Wisdom and IQ don't really seem to correlated in any significant way. Someone ought to study that! (Or perhaps someone has. I suppose the trouble would be defining wisdom in some useful way)
Tell your Hillary-loving SIL that a Harvard law professor said Ted Cruz was the smartest student he'd ever had.
Let's hope than if Pfizer's fraud in this data can be proven, it will lose its freedom from liability from these jabs and will be bankrupted by the ensuing lawsuits. I hope Jessica gets a cut of these damages and fines.
Fraud will be their undoing, I’m sure of it. Now, how do we handle our politicians and BOH. ?
Dr Rose, are you and your group of data heroes speaking with Dr Naomi R Wolf and the WarRoom team? She has assembled a group of 2500 capable volunteers plus 250 lawyers who are sifting through these data dumps.
Perhaps there are synergies there to help expedite this data review?
I wish I could help; I simply do not have the skill set.
yup
This and earlier posts are extraordinarily valuable, and courageous, in trying to restore integrity to the allopathic approach to health care (which addresses disease via drugs and vaccines). But allopathic medicine is not enough.
For superior resistance to falling ill in the first place, and for greater health, crucially needed is an extensive review of nutritional and other ways to strengthen the first two stages of the immune system (aka “innate”).
Stage one includes neutrophils, macrophages, and the like. They begin to go to work almost within minutes of the body’s detection of infection. Natural killer cells come in, as stage two, about three days after infection. Only after a week or two do antibodies, stage three, begin to form and work. When made healthy and strong by proper nutrition—the “complementary” approach, adding what is missing, completing the body’s needs—the first two stages can often preclude the need for drugs and vaccines.
Even when nutritional recommendations are made in the allopathic approach, they often lack something important. For example, although recommendations for vitamin D have become more common, usually lacking are recommendations also for adequate vitamin K2, magnesium, and vitamin A, all of which the body needs to make vitamin D work well. Further, they are treated as if they were allopathic drugs, such as employing black cumin seed (nigella sativa) only because compounds in it interfere with actions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33746069/ And doses of such things as vitamin C are usually way too low for many uses. (Good for World Council for Health for giving one of Linus Pauling’s protocols. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/vitamin-c-for-covid/ He later went to 12 grams in divided doses daily, bowel tolerance limited, to prevent infection in the first place.)
You can find “A fuller view of natural anti-infectives” in the health subsection of my new substack The Menelaus Gambit (Seeing Beneath the Illusions). https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/a-fuller-picture-of-natural-anti?s=w I have spent 50 years reading widely and using various techniques, first to ward off colds and flu, and then to ameliorate crippling and life-threatening consequences of the 1976 Swine Flu shot. The relevance is staggering.
I agree with you, but as long as there is money to be made off people's illnesses, natural preventions will be hidden. That's why we need people like you and a parallel medical system of independent doctors free of corporations, insurers and other influences.
Dr. Byram Bridle is involved in setting up a company to work on this - and you know he's not gonna back down. https://immunoceutica.ca/
I like your new substack! I just subscribed. All good information, THANKS!
It seemed to me as an outsider that a/the previous data dump listing over 1200 adverse reactions to the jab was quite a revelation. Does this one amount to anything, other than revealing trial fraud and obfuscation? I’ll be anxiously awaiting further analysis.
Thanks as always Jessica.
I think those were 1200 real reactions that were documented, and ignored. But what we need to be careful of, and Jessica can confirm this, is that the nine pages of adverse reactions we keep reading about was a laundry list of what reactions to look for, not necessarily reactions that happened.
Case report forms (CRFs) are not required to be submitted to an application for all study subjects; CRFs are only required for subjects who experience a serious adverse event, death, an adverse event that is predefined in the study protocol as being of interest, and withdrawal due to an adverse event. So, it would be completely normal to only see a subset of subjects have a CRF submitted to an application. In this case, where they're trying very hard to cover up any serious adverse events, I wouldn't be surprised to see less than 10% of the subjects represented. At some point in this data dump there will be patient-level data listings that include every data item reported, and once those listings are available, one can determine if all of the case report forms have been released or not.
thank you for this...
Jessica Lisa is wrong. Case report (or record) forms - CRFs are created for EVERY trial subject. https://ichgcp.net/8-essential-documents-for-the-conduct-of-a-clinical-trial
Yes. This seems apparent in the references I listed. Thanks. :)
What accounts for the discrepancy?
Go easy on the poor Titanic now as it was built 40 miles form where I grew up and it was in perfect condition when the shipyard handed over the key fob to the new owner.... but I digress! Yes, true to form Pfizer is playing the elusive card, and what is sad is that's all under the 'watchful' eye of the so called "authorities" (FDA etc). I mean this is a gigantic crime being committed right before our eyes, and like Hunter and his escapades, there appears to be no recourse. The ugliness of the Big Pharma / Media / Government Crime Syndicate is there for all to see in big bright capital letters. Keep doing what yer doing there Unacceptable Jessica!!!
It was obvious from the beginning that there was an intentional disorderly/disorganized release of the Pfizer documents in order to purposely confound the analysis by the experts combing through the information/data. The court should have ordered a specific release methodology.
My guess is that the sociopaths in charge are threading a needle.
Years ago, I worked next door to a Pfizer research lab. At lunch people in that building would occasionally chat; I asked a clutch of bespectacled lab rats who they worked for, they said Pfizer. Having done my masters in Med Micro and curious, I asked "how do you like it?"
There was some nervous, bitter laughter and one woman said "They just paid out another multi-million dollar fine..." I don't remember the rest of the conversation, but it seemed they had expected they'd be saving lives and, instead, they were rationalizing their salary on a daily basis. Not a happy group. That was years ago and maybe those folks with a conscience winnowed themselves out, but I think the risk of a disgusted whistleblower forces the sociopaths in charge to find ways to "comply" without complying, so as to maintain the delicate balance.
Out of college, I interviewed with Pharm companies, innocent of all this, but, even back then, something smelled off -- they just didn't seem to actually care about the people taking their pills -- and I went another direction.
They could still be sanctioned by the presiding judge for contempt, for failure to act in good faith, but they're experts in pushing right up to the red line and not crossing it. We'll see.
Fortunately, we have people like Jessica who can see through the bs and mine damning data from what scraps they provide.
Aren't you glad you went in another direction? I totally agree with your assessment of Big Pharma and that the sociopaths in charge are indeed threading a needle.
Did you see Pfizer's recent letter to investors? Despite a 1Q22 $7.8B profit (61% increase), their forward-looking statement is somewhat measured, and includes this risk: "unforeseen safety issues and claims for personal injury or death arising from the use of our COVID-19 vaccine and other products and product candidates developed or manufactured by us". Why would they say that given their generous liability protections?
https://investors.biontech.de/node/11931/html#ic5e06a05a31d4c4491031d3208cef8c2_2806
medical products of all kinds fall into the same 'profits before patients' mind set. a good friend's daughter was making insane $$, selling, consulting & installing pace makers. she quit after a few years, sickened by the push to sell, sell, sell. they were literally taught to stretch the criteria for someone 'needing' a pace maker, which was then billed to insurance at a 4000 % mark-up on cost of manufacture. ugh
Wow. Once they've installed a pacemaker, that individual is a money-maker for the rest of her/his life, with all the restrictions and reduction in quality of life it implies. Stents, same deal, except all hard evidence is that they provide no long-term benefit... and yet they go on....
Jessica: Do you know about Abstractor? It is a tool that looks at the Pfizer pdf documents from the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) organisation in the US and searches for keywords. Results are displayed by document and page number with links to the documents matching the keyword(s). Here ia an article about it:
https://jasonmorphett.substack.com/p/abstractor-a-searchable-front-end?s=r
yup
This is amazing work.
Thank you to for your outstanding work on howbad.info and howbadismybatch.com
This is the one real tool and set of organized information that has worked for me to get through to people that something isn't right. I actually watched the color on a Ph.D. trained friend's face drain when I gave her this tool, when nothing else seemed to sink in. Batch number correlates well at the person level in my experience when I can tell someone which shot gave them more side effects.
I see posts on Twitter discounting the batch variation as mere variation in mRNA dosage as if that is acceptable.
It's amazing how they gave the placebo group the shots too...shots 1-2 placebo 3-4 BNT162b2 is that normal?