Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Igor Chudov's avatar

Jessica, thank you very much for looking after women's health. This statistical approach is much needed and these publications are NOT a waste of time. Someone will notice and eventually the wrongdoers will be held to account.

If your article changes one young woman's mind it was worth it -- and I am sure that it accomplishes much more than that.

Expand full comment
DWB's avatar

Fauci didn't even study this because he thinks there is "no biological plausibility". This term has been used to justify various adverse events.

From Dec. 18, 2020 at a CNN Town Hall:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: My question about the coronavirus vaccine is if the vaccine will affect male fertility. My wife and I will be trying to have a baby next year. And we were wondering if it would affect male fertility or if it would cause any harm to my wife or the baby if she were to become pregnant.

DON LEMON: Doctor?

ANTHONY FAUCI: Yes, there -- yes, there is absolutely no biological reason at all that the vaccine and the mechanism whereby it works should have any impact or any negative effect at all on fertility.

LEMON: Is that something they even looked at, at the trials? Is that part of the...

FAUCI: No, that's not. That's not part of the trial.

But you have to have a biological plausibility that it might have something to do with facility. I mean, we do a lot of different animal studies. Nothing comes up that would even make you suspect that it would have a problem with fertility.

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2012/18/se.01.html

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts