Unacceptable Jessica

Share this post
"Coding Logic Error" and fun with ICD-10 codes
jessicar.substack.com

"Coding Logic Error" and fun with ICD-10 codes

From p-flagrant lies to p-coding logic error to p-ICD-10 code-buggery

Jessica Rose
Jun 7
211
26
Share this post
"Coding Logic Error" and fun with ICD-10 codes
jessicar.substack.com

Update: Thank you to ‘That Day’ for the comment! Watch this short clip from Ivor Cummins.

I feel like it might be time to clear up this whole thing about ‘COVID deaths’.

Now we all know about the ‘Coding Logic Error’ kerfuffle that happened in March. If you do not, you can read this. To summarize, the death counts reported (and repeated incessantly) in kids in America due to COVID-19 were not correct. Once the ‘Coding Logic Error’ was corrected, at least 1/4 of all of the reported deaths were found to be erroneous. In other words, those kids didn’t die from COVID-19. If this doesn’t shake you up, check yourself.

Please go to this Substack article.

John Dee's Almanac
Excess Mortality Due to COVID
Yesterday I revealed the monthly series for non-COVID mortality for England & Wales for the period 1970 – 2021 and compared this with all cause mortality. This morning it made sense to subtract one set of figures from the other and arrive at an estimated of excess mortality due to COVID. In the plot below you’ll see two nicely defined waves, the second …
Read more
a month ago · 7 likes · John Dee

Now read the paragraphs in the following screenshot until you really and truly understand their meaning. And then call your MP, your Senator, your judge, everyone and start screaming fraud.

You can go here to confirm this atrociousness. One thing that struck me in particular (because of my love of the RAAS), was the part on the ‘changes and comparability ratios following dual coding by MUSE 5.5 and MUSE 5.8 for selected leading causes of death’. Take a look at Table 3 in the document and refer to E86 to E87. -44% change?

That’s huge. This applies to leading cause of death being: ‘Disorders of fluid, electrolyte’. Funny that the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System regulates electrolyte levels and depends on ACE-2 to do so. Just saying.

They write:

The data analysed in this paper is based on the original software coding without revision. This means that, unlike our finalised death registrations, this data has not been subject to full quality checks and any further information on the death that is provided that may revise the cause of death has not been included.

So what this means is that many of the so-called COVID-19 deaths, were in fact, not.

The following Table (Table 1) shows the differences between the counts of deaths (underlying cause of death (UCOD)) according to the versions of the software (there’s IRIS 4.2.3, MUSE 5.5 and MUSE 5.8). The updated version (MUSE 5.8) resulted in dramatic differences in causes of death. Well, I would call 599 dramatic. This is the difference in leading cause between MUSE 5.5 and 5.8. Imagine all 599 of these were COVID-19 deaths removed as the leading cause of death. In other words, person died ‘with COVID’ and not ‘from COVID’.

I have not for one iota of a second considered analyzing data involving ‘deaths’ and ‘cases’ because the data is sheit. Here’s proof. There’s no polite way to say it. The COVID-19 pandemic/panorama/circus is a farse - a bad board game that everyone is sick of playing. The shots that came as a ‘solution’? My God. The humanity.

The overall proportion of records with an underlying cause of death coded to a different leading cause by MUSE 5.5 and MUSE 5.8 was 1.4%.

Now you might be thinking, 1.4% doesn’t sound that bad right? Well, maybe not as a standalone alteration. But one of the things that keeps repeating in the context of data when it has anything to do with COVID is INCONSISTENCY. This is an example with a clear explanation of how inconsistencies in death counts can come about, but this is just one example of what we know about. And not many people know about it! What don’t we know about with regard to inconsistencies in COVID data? And in this particular case, how would the correct classifications of causes of death change the public health narrative? Would a single kid have died from COVID-19 at all? Marty Makary would probably say no. Would we have this so-called emergency? Of course not. You’ve been gamed.

Don’t even get me started on bloody ‘cases’.

Please also refer to this Substack article written by John Dee.

26
Share this post
"Coding Logic Error" and fun with ICD-10 codes
jessicar.substack.com
26 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Just Me
Jun 7Liked by Jessica Rose

Now wouldn’t you think the outrage from this would make MSM during prime time?! Your digging and your findings are extremely eye-opening! Shattering! I need to read through it again, and probably again!

Do you know how when you go in the grocery store they have those bulletin boards people can pin things on? I say we start copying out all this information and leave it in strategic places for people to see. Who knows? Everyone persons life that can be made aware will just keep spreading. 

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
8 replies by Jessica Rose and others
That Day
Writes That’s Newsletter Jun 7Liked by Jessica Rose

Jessica… Ivor Cummins presents some useful death data by age in Ireland.. death rate by age declined over 20,21

See his YouTube Channel..no excess deaths… https://youtube.com/watch?v=uKpnLda6hS4&feature=share

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 reply
24 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Jessica Rose
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing