Great work. Thank you for investing your time in this. I am the Grandfather of what I 1000% believe is a vax injured 13 year old boy who is now considered “on the spectrum.” I told my children, including the mother of my grandson, that given what I now know about vax safety and efficacy, I wish had never had them vaxxed. They just scoffed at me and reacted with “Geez, another boomer conspiracy theory.” Work like yours may help wake them up. I hope so… I now have an 8-week out grandson and I rue the day his parents take him in for his MMR shot.
Some clips: ... 6th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine on p. 1791, under the heading "Multiple Sclerosis and other DEMYELINATING Diseases", it states ... (including post infectious and POSTVACCINAL ENCEPHALOMYELITIS)...(P. 1798) - "the association of the neurologic disorder with vaccination or inoculation usually leaves the diagnosis in little doubt, ... The way that the true etiology of autism is hidden from doctors is by changing the name of the vaccine induced disease. For example, SUB ACUTE SCLEROSING PAN ENCEPHALITIS (SSPE) has been changed to AUTISM, as is demonstrated in the 10th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine ...
Franklin - glad to pull this out rather than just having it hide in my archives. I don't know what became of Dr. Carley, but long ago I found her WILD ALL CAPS articles and realized she was onto something.
Who can find this now? AI? LOL! AI is here to bury and rewrite (deep fake) the past.
And don't forget the push to vax the animals. I have an 18 year old cat with infrequent jabs, including rabies, who is indoor. She has had zero health issues till now. I have another cat mutliple up to date on jabs just so he could get boarded while I had work on house done... over time. That cat is 14 years old and dying now. Combo of thyroid disease and cancer of the gut/stomach of some 'kind' the vets say not FeLuke (blood work normal). He is fading fast. Be gone in a month or maybe less. Crying because he's my favorite bitey lovey cat. All previous animals I have had (minimal jabs) lasted 17, 18, in one cat 19 years and only PTS from eye cancer. The food is more heavily poisoned now, the water contaminated too. And the jabs they give the animals totally not needed!
I stopped getting my cats vaccinated. But it's important to know that commercial pet food is also a major factor in the prevalence of disease among pets today, especially dry kibble.
Four years ago we drove 3 hours to pick up a new puppy of our favorite breed. Between reaching an agreement with the seller and our arrival, they gave her a five-vaccine package--too early for that age if at all helpful--and she was one sick puppy, very different from the videos they sent earlier. She had what is known as Puppy Strangles, with a highly stressed immune system, overstimulated lymphatics, weeping eyes, etc. Thanks to the research of Aluminium expert Dr. Exley, and help from two local vets, we were able to chelate out the aluminum in her body with volcanic water and restore her to health. She is now a healthy happy member of the family. But yes, it happens to animals too.....
A Whip of Cords - Retired pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas, just recently published a book, "Vax Facts". He learned during his very successful career as a pediatrician and experiencing vaccine injury with one of his Children the truth about vaccine injuries and spoke out which eventually led to the state of Oregon taking away his license. Maybe you could share a copy of his book with your Children for your Grandchildren's sakes.
A Whip of Cords - Baby Boomer here too. My husband and I became Parents very late in life through the BLESSING of adoption. Our Child was a HEALTHY, developing "PERFECTLY" (per his pediatrician) toddler until all of that changed "mysteriously" at about 18 months old.
We FOOLISHLY and BLINDLY followed the CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule per our pediatrician's recommendations. Our Son is a teen now and if we had known then what we have learned over the past 5 years, he would have received ZERO vaccines.
EVIL is being inflicted upon our INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS Children and we MUST STOP IT.
One word: homeopathy. Despite the censorship around it, homeopathy is a legitimate science founded by Hahnemann, based on the principle of "like cures like." You can give a homeopathic remedy alongside the MMR vaccine to help reduce potential side effects. In fact, a potentised form of the MMR vaccine itself can support the body in processing and healing from any adverse effects of the shot at the time of the shot or even years later.
I am not able to share your enthusiasm for homeopathy. I guess I am one of the few who has owned, read and used Hahnemann's "Materia Medica". I have also had a large range of homeopathic medicines - and prescribed them - in addition to a dispensary of 'normal' pharmaceuticals - largely unused.
I would briefly state as follows. Just as vaccines are credited with an improvement in health which is much more clearly associated with better hygiene - better water, sewage removal, and better food; so homeopathy kept its patients away from very nasty, dangerous drugs of the era; another element of Homeopathy was not to take any strong flavours, e.g. Mint, at the same time as the remedies. The body was able to maximise its inbuilt resources to tackle the disease!
So I am suggesting that the benefits were there - but that they were likely to be indirect.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts—and I genuinely appreciate that you’ve engaged so deeply with homeopathy, especially having read and used Hahnemann’s Materia Medica and prescribed remedies yourself. That’s quite rare and shows a sincere curiosity and commitment to understanding it from within.
I hear you on the idea that some of homeopathy’s historical benefits may have been indirect—like keeping patients away from toxic medicines of the time, or emphasizing rest and avoidance of overstimulation like strong flavours. Those factors alone could certainly support the body's healing capacity, especially in an era without modern sanitation or nutrition.
That said, my own experiences—particularly with Homeopathic Detox Therapy (HDT)—have led me to a different view. HDT was developed in the Netherlands by Ton Jansen in the 1990s. It builds upon classical homeopathy but adds a more systematic focus on clearing the lingering energetic effects of toxins—such as pharmaceuticals, vaccines, anesthetics, and even emotional traumas—using targeted remedy sequences. In practice, I’ve seen it help shift deeply entrenched issues that hadn’t responded to other forms of treatment.
So while I understand and respect your perspective that some of homeopathy’s benefits may have been more circumstantial or indirect, I’ve personally witnessed and experienced outcomes that suggest a more active, causative role—especially when working with detox protocols like HDT.
I really value conversations like this that challenge and deepen our understanding. Thanks again for sharing your take.
Mental acuity? My good man she said there was a linear relationship between two non linear datasets with different regression models. This whole blog was statistical malpractice and overfitting.
Well Rick, the most damning piece of evidence is that the autism data shown is actually two distinct exponential curves, not one. Taking the logarithm of the exponential autism data above should turn the data into a single linear log transformed line (as logarithms undo exponentiation). However, taking the logarithm of that data yields *two* distinct linear lines, not one. What this means, in laymans terms, is she has artificially stitched two different records *which disagree with each other* about the growth rate of the prevalence of autism in America. In even simpler terms, her autism data is wrong and thus her conclusions are wrong.
My son was born in 1992 and diagnosed with ASD in 1996. If you are wondering, his descent into autism began after his MMR vaccine at 15 months. I’d say you are exactly right in your analysis. The more light shown on this national tragedy, the better. Thanks for all your hard work on EVERYTHING. It helps to have smart, compassionate people on your side, fighting the good fight.
My son was born in 2000. His descent into autism started within days after an MMR shot at age 3. I quickly learned two things:
(1) His healthcare providers responded with an immediate, knee-jerk response that the drastic deterioration in his behavior and health could not possibly have anything to do with the chemical that was injected into him just days before.
(2) Many other parents had a similar experience with the shot and with the healthcare response.
It amazes me that 20+ years later we are still "discovering" what parents knew several decades ago. The denial and cover-up of vaccine injuries has been very successful.
The vaccine piece is also key as well, but also muddies things. Vaccines cause vaccine induced encephalopathy (VIE). VIE has the exact same things as autism, so it was also incorrectly diagnosed as autism — leading to further spikes in numbers.
Thank you, Frankin. These are very important and excellent points and I believe the changing of the DSM criteria was almost intended to "muddy the DATA waters" as most certainly these vaccine manufacturers were well aware of the potential SAEs including autism. We do know of course that with Covid vax, for example, the manufacturers hoarded massive tranches of data from the general public and likely still do. They also wiped out the control groups... I have been calling it data butchery for a long time.. the data so damaged that we may never truly know the scope of this medical democide.
At least Jessica is attempting to illuminate us with her best approximations (complete with caveats..)
the criteria has since been narrowed, leaving off Asperger's now (I think it may be a bit more technical than that.) but the result was not a lowering of the rate, like the PTB wished, but knocking the higher-functioning kids off lists to get supportive services, etc.
The joint study of pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas and James Lyons-Weiler, PhD took over 12K of Dr. Thomas pediatric patients from his entire clinical practice over many, many years.
The study compared clinical visit reasons for each child visit (encounter) and compared the VAXED vs UNVAXED children (all from his practice. The clinical signals were DEAFENING. The UNVAXED children had exponentially FEWER clinical issues than the vaxed!!!!
And, of course, he had his license taken away.. as the study was widely smeared. The Children's Health Defense features him. I love these guys. It is one, tiny glimmer of hope.
I cannot presently find my link/reference to this study.. but will try to find it.
It would be interesting, indeed, to know what Paul Thomas thinks of the changing DSM "autism" diagnostic criteria.......
Here is the article showing the difference between vaxxed and unvaxxed kids in Dr. Paul Thomas pediatric practice and study designed with James Lyons-Weiler. It shows charts contrasting reasons for visits...very illuminating
Average age of Autism diagnosis is 4 years, so actually 1992 is the inflection point. This is after an additional dose of MMR was required and adoption of HepB vaccine at birth,
Thank you for your continued effort on this issue, despite the danger to career and reputation it may carry.
To a rank layman like myself, it is incomprehensible that one can argue that injecting children with tens if not dozens of injections before, during and right after puberty carries no risk to the development of their brain.
And what about the potential risk that any damage is cumulative over generations, increasing probability for damage over time?
But no, vaccines are treated as an article of faith even by people who stand nothing to gain from a cultish belief.
I'll try to get people to look at this. Have you considered trying to use a neural-net (I think that's what it's called?) to collect and collate/correlate even greater samples so you can make nation-by-nation comparisons? Becaue if you get the same "vaccines introduced - uptick in autism disorders" from vastly different nations, there can be only one explanation.
Puberty might be a vulnerable time, but I would consider infancy even more vulnerable, because that's when your nervous system and brain are developing. Not to mention your immune system.
What I've been thinking about is if there's a cumulative effect over generations.
Mom I has a 1/100 000 of having an autistic child, due to genetics and environmental toxins.
Mom II has a 1/50 000, as above.
Mom III, 1/10 000.
Mom IV, 1/1 000.
A stacking accumulated heightened probability of the afflication manifesting, caused by genetics, but mainly environmental toxins of so many varieties and in so small doses it will not show up when testing within a single generation.
The only real way of testing (I guess) would be if one had access to blood a/o tissue samples/test results for the relevant generation, from 1950s to present day, for at least 10 000 individuals, multiplied over several different nations/sub-categories.
That would be a humungous study, with multiple points of failure and errors even if everything was hunky-dory materials and methods-wise.
Rant:
And worse, let's say there's a combinatorial effect from flame retardants, adjuvants, sweeterners, PFAS, PVC, ftalates and so on. The response from authorities and industry and capitalists and unions would be:
"So what? You want to go back to the 19th century? Do you realise what blanket bans and hard limits would do to the profits of the quarter?!"
That was the response when people warned about heavy metals in the water table, asbestos, stone dust, metal dust, and so on:
"But what about our comfy lifestyle!? What about profits?!"
And St. Greta the Proxy-Palestinian and her ilk is no hope. Ignorant, conceited and lacking the ability to go find facts about the climate and the environment. Truly, they are rebels without a cause.
Did you look into any of Andrew Wakefield’s research into this? The Higherside Chats has amazing interview with with him from probably three or four years ago. They really lied about him.
Thank you, Kelly. The one thing that struck me in his interview with higherside chats is he compared it to what happened in the United States with the car the Pinto and how there were congressional hearings about it and it’s safety. they knew that it was a horribly unsafe car, but they didn’t care. They allowed it to be in production and that just tells you everything The government does not care about you. They only care about the bottom line. I tell everybody I know about that higherside chats interview. I’m sure there’s many many more since then. Thank you.
I’m not sure I agree with the blanket statement about the government. I do understand where you are coming from and I respect your opinion. The government certainly attracts people who want power. It's not operating like a celestial realm but riddled with laws (in many cases these have come on the aftermath of abuse of power) and is a complex beast. Incidentally, the federal government employs citizens from all over the nation and immigrants. It's not an “other” it's composed of people just like you and your neighbors. May God bless you.
Yes, I suppose that blanket statement is not true for everyone in the government. I guess I’m coming from the point of living in a state where the government-both sides-show nothing but contempt for conservatism and conservatives.
Hopefully RFK Jr can take us from correlation to causation...it doesn't seem like a big step given the work that you and others have done. I can remember when the Nobel Prise was given for the work you are doing but now... not so much.
I work as an early childhood educator in Ontario. All children entering childcare or school need their current inoculations according to age. I look suspected and heard a few negative things about these inoculations. How can people pushback?
Excellent, nice to know my guess to your article yesterday was right, but not that hard. You should get a Nobel Prize but might have to wait a long time.
"Historically, identifying the environmental factors behind autism has led to pseudoscientific beliefs such as the idea – now widely debunked – that certain vaccines might be involved."
"It was not until 1977, when a couple of psychiatrists carried out a landmark study demonstrating that autism often runs in identical twins, that a more nuanced and accurate picture of autism's origins began to emerge."
I wonder if identical twins have identical vaccine schedules. There will be a lot of muddying of waters but eventually the truth will out. I suspect that many more parents will resist vaccination of their children and when that increasing number of children prove to be healthier physically and mentally the dam will burst and all the muddy water drain away.
Also 'pseudoscientific beliefs' is a flag for me that something is to be hidden. That tells me I really have to check what is being called such before ignoring it. I recommend Bruno Latour's book "Science in Action": only nit-picking leads to progress.
Medical science has been overly focused on genetics. Cancer is a good example, where the genetic angle has not led to much if any progress.
We are all subject to an increasing amount of toxic exposure from many sources. My personal thinking is that individual genetics probably determine where the damage manifests.
The nature of current medical science is so reductionist that it tends to consider only one cause for things. In reality biology is a lot messier, and things are undoubtedly multi-factorial.
I agree. Especially the combination of micro plastics with all the never before created industrial chemicals and their reaction products all making unknown epigenetic modifications. We have become too clever, yet not clever enough for our own good. We need to focus on clearing up mess we make. Jessica Rose is one of the rare people who knows science and that we can't be trusted to exploit it with wisdom.
1 in 31 is a disaster, but it is 1 in 20 boys and in California, which has the highest vaccination rates, I in 12 boys is autistic. Hobbit Hotez wrote a book to prove( to himself) that his daughter's autism was not caused by vaccines. I don't think your graph will persuade him.
This is the 250th anniversary of the midnight ride of Paul Revere. Jessica is a modern Paul Revere who is warning us, "Gates and W.H.O. are coming!"
my heart breaks for the kids like Hotez' daughter. for sure he will not do a damn thing to help her medically, even told Rogan that they enjoy 'junk food' together. :( too sad.
To find the true inflections you need to take the derivative of the data. Noise-free is the derivative of the fits.
Another plot to try is cumulative vaccine number (x) vs autism rate (y). That may well show a sudden change in slope. A logistic or arctangent fit might represent that data.
Great work. Thank you for investing your time in this. I am the Grandfather of what I 1000% believe is a vax injured 13 year old boy who is now considered “on the spectrum.” I told my children, including the mother of my grandson, that given what I now know about vax safety and efficacy, I wish had never had them vaxxed. They just scoffed at me and reacted with “Geez, another boomer conspiracy theory.” Work like yours may help wake them up. I hope so… I now have an 8-week out grandson and I rue the day his parents take him in for his MMR shot.
I just commented earlier ago. When we call vax injury, autism, that isn’t correct.
We need to call it vaccine induced encephalopathy. This term is clinically and legally correct and can be used to shine the light on what’s occurring here: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling
Dr. Rebecca Carley was onto this. See the wayback machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20080704102226/http://www.drcarley.com./ Search for SSPE.
Some clips: ... 6th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine on p. 1791, under the heading "Multiple Sclerosis and other DEMYELINATING Diseases", it states ... (including post infectious and POSTVACCINAL ENCEPHALOMYELITIS)...(P. 1798) - "the association of the neurologic disorder with vaccination or inoculation usually leaves the diagnosis in little doubt, ... The way that the true etiology of autism is hidden from doctors is by changing the name of the vaccine induced disease. For example, SUB ACUTE SCLEROSING PAN ENCEPHALITIS (SSPE) has been changed to AUTISM, as is demonstrated in the 10th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine ...
🔥🔥🔥 this comment is excellent and spot on. Thanks for the link too JerryB! Greatly appreciated
Franklin - glad to pull this out rather than just having it hide in my archives. I don't know what became of Dr. Carley, but long ago I found her WILD ALL CAPS articles and realized she was onto something.
Who can find this now? AI? LOL! AI is here to bury and rewrite (deep fake) the past.
Keep pushing the truth!
And don't forget the push to vax the animals. I have an 18 year old cat with infrequent jabs, including rabies, who is indoor. She has had zero health issues till now. I have another cat mutliple up to date on jabs just so he could get boarded while I had work on house done... over time. That cat is 14 years old and dying now. Combo of thyroid disease and cancer of the gut/stomach of some 'kind' the vets say not FeLuke (blood work normal). He is fading fast. Be gone in a month or maybe less. Crying because he's my favorite bitey lovey cat. All previous animals I have had (minimal jabs) lasted 17, 18, in one cat 19 years and only PTS from eye cancer. The food is more heavily poisoned now, the water contaminated too. And the jabs they give the animals totally not needed!
I stopped getting my cats vaccinated. But it's important to know that commercial pet food is also a major factor in the prevalence of disease among pets today, especially dry kibble.
Indeed.
And if this happens to kids
It happens to animals too
Four years ago we drove 3 hours to pick up a new puppy of our favorite breed. Between reaching an agreement with the seller and our arrival, they gave her a five-vaccine package--too early for that age if at all helpful--and she was one sick puppy, very different from the videos they sent earlier. She had what is known as Puppy Strangles, with a highly stressed immune system, overstimulated lymphatics, weeping eyes, etc. Thanks to the research of Aluminium expert Dr. Exley, and help from two local vets, we were able to chelate out the aluminum in her body with volcanic water and restore her to health. She is now a healthy happy member of the family. But yes, it happens to animals too.....
A Whip of Cords - Retired pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas, just recently published a book, "Vax Facts". He learned during his very successful career as a pediatrician and experiencing vaccine injury with one of his Children the truth about vaccine injuries and spoke out which eventually led to the state of Oregon taking away his license. Maybe you could share a copy of his book with your Children for your Grandchildren's sakes.
Thank you. I’ll do it.
A Whip of Cords - Baby Boomer here too. My husband and I became Parents very late in life through the BLESSING of adoption. Our Child was a HEALTHY, developing "PERFECTLY" (per his pediatrician) toddler until all of that changed "mysteriously" at about 18 months old.
We FOOLISHLY and BLINDLY followed the CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule per our pediatrician's recommendations. Our Son is a teen now and if we had known then what we have learned over the past 5 years, he would have received ZERO vaccines.
EVIL is being inflicted upon our INNOCENT, DEFENSELESS Children and we MUST STOP IT.
((hugs)) to you, Whipofcords. we WISH it was only a 'boomer conspiracy theory' :(
when I finally get grandchildren (soon I hope) they will be gloriously healthily unvaxxed and I will have baby-sized tin foil hats for them.
You do realise that tin-foil is Aluminium - don't you :-)
😜
One word: homeopathy. Despite the censorship around it, homeopathy is a legitimate science founded by Hahnemann, based on the principle of "like cures like." You can give a homeopathic remedy alongside the MMR vaccine to help reduce potential side effects. In fact, a potentised form of the MMR vaccine itself can support the body in processing and healing from any adverse effects of the shot at the time of the shot or even years later.
One dictum: Prevention is better than cure.
100% if I had my time over again no vaccine would ever enter mine or my children's bodies!
I am not able to share your enthusiasm for homeopathy. I guess I am one of the few who has owned, read and used Hahnemann's "Materia Medica". I have also had a large range of homeopathic medicines - and prescribed them - in addition to a dispensary of 'normal' pharmaceuticals - largely unused.
I would briefly state as follows. Just as vaccines are credited with an improvement in health which is much more clearly associated with better hygiene - better water, sewage removal, and better food; so homeopathy kept its patients away from very nasty, dangerous drugs of the era; another element of Homeopathy was not to take any strong flavours, e.g. Mint, at the same time as the remedies. The body was able to maximise its inbuilt resources to tackle the disease!
So I am suggesting that the benefits were there - but that they were likely to be indirect.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts—and I genuinely appreciate that you’ve engaged so deeply with homeopathy, especially having read and used Hahnemann’s Materia Medica and prescribed remedies yourself. That’s quite rare and shows a sincere curiosity and commitment to understanding it from within.
I hear you on the idea that some of homeopathy’s historical benefits may have been indirect—like keeping patients away from toxic medicines of the time, or emphasizing rest and avoidance of overstimulation like strong flavours. Those factors alone could certainly support the body's healing capacity, especially in an era without modern sanitation or nutrition.
That said, my own experiences—particularly with Homeopathic Detox Therapy (HDT)—have led me to a different view. HDT was developed in the Netherlands by Ton Jansen in the 1990s. It builds upon classical homeopathy but adds a more systematic focus on clearing the lingering energetic effects of toxins—such as pharmaceuticals, vaccines, anesthetics, and even emotional traumas—using targeted remedy sequences. In practice, I’ve seen it help shift deeply entrenched issues that hadn’t responded to other forms of treatment.
So while I understand and respect your perspective that some of homeopathy’s benefits may have been more circumstantial or indirect, I’ve personally witnessed and experienced outcomes that suggest a more active, causative role—especially when working with detox protocols like HDT.
I really value conversations like this that challenge and deepen our understanding. Thanks again for sharing your take.
Hey Jessica. Your mental acuity is inspiring. NEVER stop your enquiries into the malfeasance of those in power. Thank you. Rick Fearn
Mental acuity? My good man she said there was a linear relationship between two non linear datasets with different regression models. This whole blog was statistical malpractice and overfitting.
Excellent comment, Jack. Please post your analysis on the dataset. Thank you.
Well Rick, the most damning piece of evidence is that the autism data shown is actually two distinct exponential curves, not one. Taking the logarithm of the exponential autism data above should turn the data into a single linear log transformed line (as logarithms undo exponentiation). However, taking the logarithm of that data yields *two* distinct linear lines, not one. What this means, in laymans terms, is she has artificially stitched two different records *which disagree with each other* about the growth rate of the prevalence of autism in America. In even simpler terms, her autism data is wrong and thus her conclusions are wrong.
My son was born in 1992 and diagnosed with ASD in 1996. If you are wondering, his descent into autism began after his MMR vaccine at 15 months. I’d say you are exactly right in your analysis. The more light shown on this national tragedy, the better. Thanks for all your hard work on EVERYTHING. It helps to have smart, compassionate people on your side, fighting the good fight.
My son was born in 2000. His descent into autism started within days after an MMR shot at age 3. I quickly learned two things:
(1) His healthcare providers responded with an immediate, knee-jerk response that the drastic deterioration in his behavior and health could not possibly have anything to do with the chemical that was injected into him just days before.
(2) Many other parents had a similar experience with the shot and with the healthcare response.
It amazes me that 20+ years later we are still "discovering" what parents knew several decades ago. The denial and cover-up of vaccine injuries has been very successful.
Hey Jessica, one of the things you’ll have to also factor in is the DSM criteria change that took place in that 90s.
In 1994, the DSM-III expanded the criteria for autism. Happened again in 2013. These expansions have led to huge rises in “autism” cases: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-the-dsm-iii-and-tv-shows-rebranded
The vaccine piece is also key as well, but also muddies things. Vaccines cause vaccine induced encephalopathy (VIE). VIE has the exact same things as autism, so it was also incorrectly diagnosed as autism — leading to further spikes in numbers.
The sad part is that we’re calling brain damage a psychiatric disease. This is also muddying things here: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling
The sooner we can clarify all of this, the better.
Thank you, Frankin. These are very important and excellent points and I believe the changing of the DSM criteria was almost intended to "muddy the DATA waters" as most certainly these vaccine manufacturers were well aware of the potential SAEs including autism. We do know of course that with Covid vax, for example, the manufacturers hoarded massive tranches of data from the general public and likely still do. They also wiped out the control groups... I have been calling it data butchery for a long time.. the data so damaged that we may never truly know the scope of this medical democide.
At least Jessica is attempting to illuminate us with her best approximations (complete with caveats..)
the criteria has since been narrowed, leaving off Asperger's now (I think it may be a bit more technical than that.) but the result was not a lowering of the rate, like the PTB wished, but knocking the higher-functioning kids off lists to get supportive services, etc.
BAwls! Thanks for this comment! Dont know a lot of people who use the term Democide so was shocked! Here’s an archived article I wrote in the word: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/democide-and-menticide
The joint study of pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas and James Lyons-Weiler, PhD took over 12K of Dr. Thomas pediatric patients from his entire clinical practice over many, many years.
The study compared clinical visit reasons for each child visit (encounter) and compared the VAXED vs UNVAXED children (all from his practice. The clinical signals were DEAFENING. The UNVAXED children had exponentially FEWER clinical issues than the vaxed!!!!
And, of course, he had his license taken away.. as the study was widely smeared. The Children's Health Defense features him. I love these guys. It is one, tiny glimmer of hope.
I cannot presently find my link/reference to this study.. but will try to find it.
It would be interesting, indeed, to know what Paul Thomas thinks of the changing DSM "autism" diagnostic criteria.......
Here is the article showing the difference between vaxxed and unvaxxed kids in Dr. Paul Thomas pediatric practice and study designed with James Lyons-Weiler. It shows charts contrasting reasons for visits...very illuminating
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/unvaccinated-children-healthier-than-vaccinated-children/
Average age of Autism diagnosis is 4 years, so actually 1992 is the inflection point. This is after an additional dose of MMR was required and adoption of HepB vaccine at birth,
Recombinant hep b vaccine was approved in 1986.
It was recommended for newborns and infants by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in 1991.
Autism is usually measured in 8 year olds.
It can often be diagnosed in 4 year olds.
1996 captures both the 8 year olds harmed after the 1986 Act and the four year olds who start getting maimed by hep b in 1991.
makes sense Dr Toby.
(my son was dx at age 3.5, back in 2008. back then, it was considered young for the dx. now it is super common)
Thank you for your continued effort on this issue, despite the danger to career and reputation it may carry.
To a rank layman like myself, it is incomprehensible that one can argue that injecting children with tens if not dozens of injections before, during and right after puberty carries no risk to the development of their brain.
And what about the potential risk that any damage is cumulative over generations, increasing probability for damage over time?
But no, vaccines are treated as an article of faith even by people who stand nothing to gain from a cultish belief.
I'll try to get people to look at this. Have you considered trying to use a neural-net (I think that's what it's called?) to collect and collate/correlate even greater samples so you can make nation-by-nation comparisons? Becaue if you get the same "vaccines introduced - uptick in autism disorders" from vastly different nations, there can be only one explanation.
Puberty might be a vulnerable time, but I would consider infancy even more vulnerable, because that's when your nervous system and brain are developing. Not to mention your immune system.
Yes.
What I've been thinking about is if there's a cumulative effect over generations.
Mom I has a 1/100 000 of having an autistic child, due to genetics and environmental toxins.
Mom II has a 1/50 000, as above.
Mom III, 1/10 000.
Mom IV, 1/1 000.
A stacking accumulated heightened probability of the afflication manifesting, caused by genetics, but mainly environmental toxins of so many varieties and in so small doses it will not show up when testing within a single generation.
The only real way of testing (I guess) would be if one had access to blood a/o tissue samples/test results for the relevant generation, from 1950s to present day, for at least 10 000 individuals, multiplied over several different nations/sub-categories.
That would be a humungous study, with multiple points of failure and errors even if everything was hunky-dory materials and methods-wise.
Rant:
And worse, let's say there's a combinatorial effect from flame retardants, adjuvants, sweeterners, PFAS, PVC, ftalates and so on. The response from authorities and industry and capitalists and unions would be:
"So what? You want to go back to the 19th century? Do you realise what blanket bans and hard limits would do to the profits of the quarter?!"
That was the response when people warned about heavy metals in the water table, asbestos, stone dust, metal dust, and so on:
"But what about our comfy lifestyle!? What about profits?!"
And St. Greta the Proxy-Palestinian and her ilk is no hope. Ignorant, conceited and lacking the ability to go find facts about the climate and the environment. Truly, they are rebels without a cause.
Aluminum, aluminum everywhere. It's even in the skies and in the food.
and soda cans.
Did you look into any of Andrew Wakefield’s research into this? The Higherside Chats has amazing interview with with him from probably three or four years ago. They really lied about him.
Of course
They kill you or destroy you if you speak against them
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/andrew-wakefield-the-real-story/
His story is amazing. He humbly tells it again in this Jan 2025 interview.
Thank you, Kelly. The one thing that struck me in his interview with higherside chats is he compared it to what happened in the United States with the car the Pinto and how there were congressional hearings about it and it’s safety. they knew that it was a horribly unsafe car, but they didn’t care. They allowed it to be in production and that just tells you everything The government does not care about you. They only care about the bottom line. I tell everybody I know about that higherside chats interview. I’m sure there’s many many more since then. Thank you.
I’m not sure I agree with the blanket statement about the government. I do understand where you are coming from and I respect your opinion. The government certainly attracts people who want power. It's not operating like a celestial realm but riddled with laws (in many cases these have come on the aftermath of abuse of power) and is a complex beast. Incidentally, the federal government employs citizens from all over the nation and immigrants. It's not an “other” it's composed of people just like you and your neighbors. May God bless you.
Yes, I suppose that blanket statement is not true for everyone in the government. I guess I’m coming from the point of living in a state where the government-both sides-show nothing but contempt for conservatism and conservatives.
Hopefully RFK Jr can take us from correlation to causation...it doesn't seem like a big step given the work that you and others have done. I can remember when the Nobel Prise was given for the work you are doing but now... not so much.
I work as an early childhood educator in Ontario. All children entering childcare or school need their current inoculations according to age. I look suspected and heard a few negative things about these inoculations. How can people pushback?
Religious Freedom's is one of the best ways. I've used it and other substsacks talk greatly about this:
https://substack.com/@peggyhall
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-use-religious-exemptions-to
I live in Oklahoma and we can file for religious or medical exemptions for our Children to PROTECT them from being CONTIUALLY injected with TOXINS.
Also homeschooling is an EXCELLENT option.
Huh. The 1986-96 lag makes total sense. And graphically intriguing (says this pattern recognition specimen of a typical human being!).
Excellent, nice to know my guess to your article yesterday was right, but not that hard. You should get a Nobel Prize but might have to wait a long time.
I came across this today: https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20250415-the-genetic-mystery-of-why-some-people-develop-autism
"Historically, identifying the environmental factors behind autism has led to pseudoscientific beliefs such as the idea – now widely debunked – that certain vaccines might be involved."
"It was not until 1977, when a couple of psychiatrists carried out a landmark study demonstrating that autism often runs in identical twins, that a more nuanced and accurate picture of autism's origins began to emerge."
I wonder if identical twins have identical vaccine schedules. There will be a lot of muddying of waters but eventually the truth will out. I suspect that many more parents will resist vaccination of their children and when that increasing number of children prove to be healthier physically and mentally the dam will burst and all the muddy water drain away.
These days the term "widely debunked" immediately makes me translate it to "goes against the narrative."
Also 'pseudoscientific beliefs' is a flag for me that something is to be hidden. That tells me I really have to check what is being called such before ignoring it. I recommend Bruno Latour's book "Science in Action": only nit-picking leads to progress.
100% ^^ I like to add the phrase 'cuz we said so', since that is really all the 'debunking' is anyway.
Medical science has been overly focused on genetics. Cancer is a good example, where the genetic angle has not led to much if any progress.
We are all subject to an increasing amount of toxic exposure from many sources. My personal thinking is that individual genetics probably determine where the damage manifests.
The nature of current medical science is so reductionist that it tends to consider only one cause for things. In reality biology is a lot messier, and things are undoubtedly multi-factorial.
I agree. Especially the combination of micro plastics with all the never before created industrial chemicals and their reaction products all making unknown epigenetic modifications. We have become too clever, yet not clever enough for our own good. We need to focus on clearing up mess we make. Jessica Rose is one of the rare people who knows science and that we can't be trusted to exploit it with wisdom.
The facts!
1 in 31 is a disaster, but it is 1 in 20 boys and in California, which has the highest vaccination rates, I in 12 boys is autistic. Hobbit Hotez wrote a book to prove( to himself) that his daughter's autism was not caused by vaccines. I don't think your graph will persuade him.
This is the 250th anniversary of the midnight ride of Paul Revere. Jessica is a modern Paul Revere who is warning us, "Gates and W.H.O. are coming!"
my heart breaks for the kids like Hotez' daughter. for sure he will not do a damn thing to help her medically, even told Rogan that they enjoy 'junk food' together. :( too sad.
To find the true inflections you need to take the derivative of the data. Noise-free is the derivative of the fits.
Another plot to try is cumulative vaccine number (x) vs autism rate (y). That may well show a sudden change in slope. A logistic or arctangent fit might represent that data.
thanks!