A real vax lot anomaly? - UPDATE!
There's a vax lot with higher association with anaphylaxis... and it's not 041L20A.
Update: I was prompted to look at the reporting location of the vax lots for the anaphylaxis reports based on the anomaly reported herein, and it turns out that the off chance under reporting thing I mentioned as a reason for the anomaly is very likely the reason for it. The vax lot EP9605 was only administered in foreign regions (FR - not necessarily France) and the reports came from there. All but 2 of them: one was reported in Georgia and one had no location listed. I would guess, that the reporting rates of adverse events are simply better in foreign countries and this would explain the anomaly.
I was prompted to look into this following reading a Substack from Vinu Arumugham the other day. He made an interesting point about the ratios of two adverse events being different between vax lots. I decided I would reproduce what he was showing and to take it further. I didn’t take it as far as I will, but this is a good start.
Before I start, I am more in the camp that believes that most of the variation perceived between vax lots (in VAERS) can be attributed to differences in distribution and administration. However, check this out.
So what this bar plot shows are the ratios of the total number of reports of anaphylaxis to total number of reports of death, per vax lot. Now, it is important to understand how examining the ratios removes any deceptiveness that might be included with regard to vax lot size. Picture this: You have 100 reports of anaphylaxis and n doses in a particular vax lot. So you have 100/n reports of anaphylaxis. You also have 10 reports of death and n doses once again, since it is the same vax lot. So you have 10/n reports of death. Thus, you have a ratio of 100:10 (10:1) reports of anaphylaxis for vax lot ‘A’ that includes n doses of product. If you calculated this ratio for a number of vax lots and found anomalies between these ratios, ie: if the ratio was inverted for example in a particular vax lot, then this would not be explainable by vax lot size variation.
An inversion is precisely what was found by Vinu and confirmed here for the vax lot EP9605. It is very anomalous, in fact.
What could explain this anomaly?
The only explanation besides the off chance that underreporting is playing a role, is that this particular vax lot EP9605 has properties that makes it induce more anaphylactic reactions than all the other 29 vax lots that I used for this example.
Perhaps this vax lot was manufactured poorly and the PEG manifested in higher concentrations. Or maybe the LNPs were larger. I don’t know.
I am going to go deeper on this and look into far more adverse event types and more vax lots.
There's no doubt in my mind that vax lots are being manufactured poorly. Pardon the repetition, but the following is much too important to let die.
The covid "vaccination" program (Operation Warp Speed) is actually being run under the National Security Council, with the DOD serving as Operating Officer and the HHS only serving in an advisory (more like propaganda) role. Roughly sixty military officials are in leadership and decision-making roles, making it look more like a military operation than a science-based effort. The pharma companies are restricted to mostly providing R&D, prototypes, and demonstrations. The DOD's own long-established suppliers are actually manufacturing and distributing the products.
For playing their role the pharma companies, which are being micro-managed by the DOD, have received billions of taxpayer dollars while the government purchases millions of doses in advance and then stockpiles them or throws them out for lack of arms to put them in as demand wanes.
Three key pieces of legislation are being used to pull it all off non-transparently and without much fear of liability or annoying regulation:
1. Emergency Use Authorization (1997 under Clinton). EUA declarations are at the sole discretion of one person, the HHS Secretary. He/she does not need any supporting scientific evidence and need only voice a belief that the product MAY be effective. EUA declarations bypass the FDA's safety and efficacy regulations by redefining pharma products military style as "medical countermeasures" rather than pharmaceuticals. Countermeasures do not legally require clinical investigation in order to be approved, so the kind of sham investigations we are seeing are clearly meant for show. The FDA is fully aware of all this, but continues to deceptively pretend the products are pharmaceuticals under their regulation.
2. Other Transaction Authority (amended in 2015 under Obama). Congress has authorized eleven federal agencies, including the DOD, to enter into “other transaction agreements” that do not need to contain the standard terms and conditions for scrutiny and regulation the way normal contracts, research grants, and procurements would for example. This can be done even if the counterparty is normally subject to regulation. The DOD used such agreements with pharma to order the R&D of "military prototype” covid vaccines. Legally speaking, no regulation needed, even for manufacturing standards. Again, the appearance of regulation is a sham (and in my opinion constitutes fraud).
3. PREP Act and "Public Health Emergency" declaration (made bulletproof in 2020 under Trump). This is what activates the two pieces of legislation above. Liability protections extend to employees, their families, and all down the supply chain. For obvious reasons, the emergency declaration is very likely to be extended into the foreseeable future.
NOTE: Some of the above information is based on in-depth legal research done by paralegal Katherine Watt* of Bailiwick News (available on Substack). All of the above information was presented by Sasha Lapytova during a Children's Health Defense Symposium titled "In the Midst of Darkness Light Prevails". The symposium was held on December 10, 2022. Sasha's presentation begins about 3hr 20min into the 6 hour video, which is available for viewing in full on their web site.** Wording of the various laws is shown along with the official org charts for vaccine development. I simply represented what Sasha presented as faithfully as I could, figuring this information needs to get out to as many as possible.
* A portion of Watt's legal research can be found at her substack in a document titled "Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box". It confirms in no uncertain terms that she knows the legal framework.
Even if these damn poisons were categorically benign, if not the World Curing Panacea they are sold as, it is maddeningly infuriating that these bastards are completely ignoring EVERY indication of danger.
There has to be hell to pay at some point for the complicit and even the incompetently culpable.